Botox Complications and Satisfaction Outcomes Following Botulinum Toxin Type A Facial Injections: A Prospective Study of 2,012 Procedures in 489 Patients.
Raul Daniel Chioibaș, Dan Lolos, Andreea Raissa Hojda, Bogdan Antonio Lolos, Jonathan Sykes
{"title":"Botox Complications and Satisfaction Outcomes Following Botulinum Toxin Type A Facial Injections: A Prospective Study of 2,012 Procedures in 489 Patients.","authors":"Raul Daniel Chioibaș, Dan Lolos, Andreea Raissa Hojda, Bogdan Antonio Lolos, Jonathan Sykes","doi":"10.1055/a-2945-2316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Botulinum toxin type A is widely used for facial rejuvenation, but prospective real-world data integrating safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives and hypotheses: </strong>To evaluate complication rates, patient satisfaction, and predictors of satisfaction following standardized upper-face injections.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, single-center cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 489 patients undergoing 2,012 procedures were treated using a standardized protocol. Clinically significant complications were recorded over 4 weeks. PROs were assessed using a customized 20-item questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-patient complication rate was 13.1%, while the per-procedure rate was 3.3%. Most complications were mild and resolved without sequelae. Overall, 94.1% of patients reported improvement, and 79.6% achieved ≥ 9/10 satisfaction. Younger age, female sex, and lower complication severity were associated with higher satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized botulinum toxin protocols provide low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. Combined reporting of safety and PROs supports reproducible and clinically relevant evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2945-2316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Botulinum toxin type A is widely used for facial rejuvenation, but prospective real-world data integrating safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remain limited.
Objectives and hypotheses: To evaluate complication rates, patient satisfaction, and predictors of satisfaction following standardized upper-face injections.
Study design: Prospective, single-center cohort study.
Methods: A total of 489 patients undergoing 2,012 procedures were treated using a standardized protocol. Clinically significant complications were recorded over 4 weeks. PROs were assessed using a customized 20-item questionnaire.
Results: The per-patient complication rate was 13.1%, while the per-procedure rate was 3.3%. Most complications were mild and resolved without sequelae. Overall, 94.1% of patients reported improvement, and 79.6% achieved ≥ 9/10 satisfaction. Younger age, female sex, and lower complication severity were associated with higher satisfaction.
Conclusion: Standardized botulinum toxin protocols provide low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. Combined reporting of safety and PROs supports reproducible and clinically relevant evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Facial Plastic Surgery is a journal that publishes topic-specific issues covering areas of aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery as it relates to the head, neck, and face. The journal''s scope includes issues devoted to scar revision, periorbital and mid-face rejuvenation, facial trauma, facial implants, rhinoplasty, neck reconstruction, cleft palate, face lifts, as well as various other emerging minimally invasive procedures.
Authors provide a global perspective on each topic, critically evaluate recent works in the field, and apply it to clinical practice.