Abhishek Krishna, Juvie Leona Lobo, Pooja Ms, Bharat Sai Makkapati, Athiyamaan Ms, Challapalli Srinivas, Sourjya Banerjee, Johan Sunny, Paul Simon, Dilson Lobo
{"title":"Evaluation and Clinical Relevance of Plan Quality Indices in Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.","authors":"Abhishek Krishna, Juvie Leona Lobo, Pooja Ms, Bharat Sai Makkapati, Athiyamaan Ms, Challapalli Srinivas, Sourjya Banerjee, Johan Sunny, Paul Simon, Dilson Lobo","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.166604.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer remains to be a significant health concern globally, with India contributing to nearly one-quarter of cases worldwide. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the standard of care, optimizing tumour dose while sparing normal tissues. Plan quality indices such as Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Overdose Index (OI), Dose Non-uniformity Ratio (DNR), and Conformity Index (COIN) are crucial in evaluating treatment plans, yet their predictive clinical relevance remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>In this Retrospective study, 84 patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation followed by CT-based HDR ICBT (Co-60) were evaluated. Plan indices were calculated per ICRU 89 and GEC-ESTRO guidelines. Correlation with tumour response (RECIST v1.1), toxicity (≥ grade 2 bladder/rectal), and clinical factors (FIGO stage, HRCTV volume, EQD2, BED, treatment duration) was assessed using t-tests, regression analyses, and Pearson's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean DHI was 0.403; OI 0.358; DNR 0.594; COIN 0.636. Higher DHI (p=0.019) and lower OI (p=0.004) were associated with tumour response; DNR and COIN were not significant. No plan index predicted ≥ grade 2 bladder or rectal toxicity. COIN correlated poorly with other indices. Multiple regression showed no consistent predictors of dosimetric indices. Logistic regression did not establish any index as a definitive predictor of 3-month response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plan quality indices provide useful quantitative insights into dose distribution in High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. In this study, DHI and OI showed an association with early tumour response, while no significant correlation was observed between plan indices and treatment-related toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166604.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer remains to be a significant health concern globally, with India contributing to nearly one-quarter of cases worldwide. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the standard of care, optimizing tumour dose while sparing normal tissues. Plan quality indices such as Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Overdose Index (OI), Dose Non-uniformity Ratio (DNR), and Conformity Index (COIN) are crucial in evaluating treatment plans, yet their predictive clinical relevance remains underexplored.
Methodology: In this Retrospective study, 84 patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation followed by CT-based HDR ICBT (Co-60) were evaluated. Plan indices were calculated per ICRU 89 and GEC-ESTRO guidelines. Correlation with tumour response (RECIST v1.1), toxicity (≥ grade 2 bladder/rectal), and clinical factors (FIGO stage, HRCTV volume, EQD2, BED, treatment duration) was assessed using t-tests, regression analyses, and Pearson's correlation.
Results: Mean DHI was 0.403; OI 0.358; DNR 0.594; COIN 0.636. Higher DHI (p=0.019) and lower OI (p=0.004) were associated with tumour response; DNR and COIN were not significant. No plan index predicted ≥ grade 2 bladder or rectal toxicity. COIN correlated poorly with other indices. Multiple regression showed no consistent predictors of dosimetric indices. Logistic regression did not establish any index as a definitive predictor of 3-month response.
Conclusion: Plan quality indices provide useful quantitative insights into dose distribution in High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. In this study, DHI and OI showed an association with early tumour response, while no significant correlation was observed between plan indices and treatment-related toxicity.
F1000ResearchPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍:
F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.