Evaluation and Clinical Relevance of Plan Quality Indices in Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2026-08-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.166604.2
Abhishek Krishna, Juvie Leona Lobo, Pooja Ms, Bharat Sai Makkapati, Athiyamaan Ms, Challapalli Srinivas, Sourjya Banerjee, Johan Sunny, Paul Simon, Dilson Lobo
{"title":"Evaluation and Clinical Relevance of Plan Quality Indices in Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.","authors":"Abhishek Krishna, Juvie Leona Lobo, Pooja Ms, Bharat Sai Makkapati, Athiyamaan Ms, Challapalli Srinivas, Sourjya Banerjee, Johan Sunny, Paul Simon, Dilson Lobo","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.166604.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer remains to be a significant health concern globally, with India contributing to nearly one-quarter of cases worldwide. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the standard of care, optimizing tumour dose while sparing normal tissues. Plan quality indices such as Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Overdose Index (OI), Dose Non-uniformity Ratio (DNR), and Conformity Index (COIN) are crucial in evaluating treatment plans, yet their predictive clinical relevance remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>In this Retrospective study, 84 patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation followed by CT-based HDR ICBT (Co-60) were evaluated. Plan indices were calculated per ICRU 89 and GEC-ESTRO guidelines. Correlation with tumour response (RECIST v1.1), toxicity (≥ grade 2 bladder/rectal), and clinical factors (FIGO stage, HRCTV volume, EQD2, BED, treatment duration) was assessed using t-tests, regression analyses, and Pearson's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean DHI was 0.403; OI 0.358; DNR 0.594; COIN 0.636. Higher DHI (p=0.019) and lower OI (p=0.004) were associated with tumour response; DNR and COIN were not significant. No plan index predicted ≥ grade 2 bladder or rectal toxicity. COIN correlated poorly with other indices. Multiple regression showed no consistent predictors of dosimetric indices. Logistic regression did not establish any index as a definitive predictor of 3-month response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plan quality indices provide useful quantitative insights into dose distribution in High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. In this study, DHI and OI showed an association with early tumour response, while no significant correlation was observed between plan indices and treatment-related toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166604.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer remains to be a significant health concern globally, with India contributing to nearly one-quarter of cases worldwide. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the standard of care, optimizing tumour dose while sparing normal tissues. Plan quality indices such as Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Overdose Index (OI), Dose Non-uniformity Ratio (DNR), and Conformity Index (COIN) are crucial in evaluating treatment plans, yet their predictive clinical relevance remains underexplored.

Methodology: In this Retrospective study, 84 patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation followed by CT-based HDR ICBT (Co-60) were evaluated. Plan indices were calculated per ICRU 89 and GEC-ESTRO guidelines. Correlation with tumour response (RECIST v1.1), toxicity (≥ grade 2 bladder/rectal), and clinical factors (FIGO stage, HRCTV volume, EQD2, BED, treatment duration) was assessed using t-tests, regression analyses, and Pearson's correlation.

Results: Mean DHI was 0.403; OI 0.358; DNR 0.594; COIN 0.636. Higher DHI (p=0.019) and lower OI (p=0.004) were associated with tumour response; DNR and COIN were not significant. No plan index predicted ≥ grade 2 bladder or rectal toxicity. COIN correlated poorly with other indices. Multiple regression showed no consistent predictors of dosimetric indices. Logistic regression did not establish any index as a definitive predictor of 3-month response.

Conclusion: Plan quality indices provide useful quantitative insights into dose distribution in High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. In this study, DHI and OI showed an association with early tumour response, while no significant correlation was observed between plan indices and treatment-related toxicity.

宫颈癌腔内近距离放射治疗计划质量指标评价及临床意义。
背景:宫颈癌仍然是全球的一个重大健康问题,印度占全世界病例的近四分之一。腔内近距离放疗(ICBT)联合外束放疗(EBRT)是标准的治疗方法,在保留正常组织的同时优化肿瘤剂量。计划质量指标,如剂量均匀性指数(DHI)、过量指数(OI)、剂量非均匀性比(DNR)和符合性指数(COIN)是评估治疗计划的关键,但其预测临床相关性仍未得到充分探讨。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,84例组织学证实的宫颈癌患者接受了明确的放化疗,随后进行了基于ct的HDR ICBT (Co-60)评估。根据ICRU 89和GEC-ESTRO指南计算计划指数。采用t检验、回归分析和Pearson相关性评估与肿瘤反应(RECIST v1.1)、毒性(≥2级膀胱/直肠)和临床因素(FIGO分期、HRCTV体积、EQD2、BED、治疗时间)的相关性。结果:平均DHI为0.403;OI 0.358;医嘱0.594;0.636硬币。较高的DHI (p=0.019)和较低的OI (p=0.004)与肿瘤反应相关;DNR和COIN差异无统计学意义。没有计划指标预测≥2级膀胱或直肠毒性。硬币与其他指数的相关性很差。多元回归分析显示,剂量学指标的预测因子不一致。Logistic回归没有建立任何指标作为3个月反应的明确预测因子。结论:计划质量指标为宫颈癌高剂量率腔内近距离放疗剂量分布提供了有益的定量认识。在本研究中,DHI和OI与早期肿瘤反应相关,而计划指标与治疗相关毒性之间未观察到显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书