Design and technoeconomic assessment of a self-powered thermoelectric steam trap monitoring system for energy efficiency and decarbonization in industrial steam networks
{"title":"Design and technoeconomic assessment of a self-powered thermoelectric steam trap monitoring system for energy efficiency and decarbonization in industrial steam networks","authors":"Yusuf Enes Tatar, Nehir Tokgoz, Ceyhun Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.133023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Industrial steam systems are major energy consumers in manufacturing, and undetected steam-trap failures cause persistent steam losses, increased boiler fuel demand, and avoidable carbon emissions. This study evaluates a self-powered monitoring concept in which thermoelectric generators (TEGs) harvest heat at steam-trap locations to operate duty-cycled sensing and LoRaWAN communication nodes without routine battery replacement or dedicated field wiring. The steam network of a real textile facility was modeled in Engineering Equation Solver and assessed through integrated energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analyses. At the nominal conditions of 170 °C steam temperature and 25 °C ambient temperature, the calculated pipeline heat loss was 27.91 W/m; a single TEC1–12706 module generated 0.1722 W, corresponding to 6.887 W and 55.09 kWh/year for the 40-trap network. The resulting energy and exergy efficiencies were 1.02% and 5.86%, while a single module supplied approximately 129 times the assumed average monitoring-node demand. Sensitivity analyses of steam temperature, cold-side thermal resistance, and module number confirmed that performance is governed primarily by the available temperature difference and heat-rejection conditions. The complete installed network cost was estimated at 2890–9200 $, with 4800 $ adopted for the moderate scenario. Electricity generation alone yielded an impractical payback period of 580.8 years; assumed monitoring-enabled fuel-demand reductions of 2%, 5%, and 10% reduced it to 2.56, 0.98, and 0.48 years, with corresponding scenario-based total savings of 23.75, 59.35, and 118.7 t CO₂/year against only 0.0117 t CO₂/year from direct TEG output. These values are potential, scenario-based monitoring-enabled benefits rather than field-verified savings. The results indicate that TEGs are more appropriately regarded as autonomous power sources for intelligent steam-trap monitoring than as primary electricity-generation devices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"305 ","pages":"Article 133023"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431126033314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Industrial steam systems are major energy consumers in manufacturing, and undetected steam-trap failures cause persistent steam losses, increased boiler fuel demand, and avoidable carbon emissions. This study evaluates a self-powered monitoring concept in which thermoelectric generators (TEGs) harvest heat at steam-trap locations to operate duty-cycled sensing and LoRaWAN communication nodes without routine battery replacement or dedicated field wiring. The steam network of a real textile facility was modeled in Engineering Equation Solver and assessed through integrated energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analyses. At the nominal conditions of 170 °C steam temperature and 25 °C ambient temperature, the calculated pipeline heat loss was 27.91 W/m; a single TEC1–12706 module generated 0.1722 W, corresponding to 6.887 W and 55.09 kWh/year for the 40-trap network. The resulting energy and exergy efficiencies were 1.02% and 5.86%, while a single module supplied approximately 129 times the assumed average monitoring-node demand. Sensitivity analyses of steam temperature, cold-side thermal resistance, and module number confirmed that performance is governed primarily by the available temperature difference and heat-rejection conditions. The complete installed network cost was estimated at 2890–9200 $, with 4800 $ adopted for the moderate scenario. Electricity generation alone yielded an impractical payback period of 580.8 years; assumed monitoring-enabled fuel-demand reductions of 2%, 5%, and 10% reduced it to 2.56, 0.98, and 0.48 years, with corresponding scenario-based total savings of 23.75, 59.35, and 118.7 t CO₂/year against only 0.0117 t CO₂/year from direct TEG output. These values are potential, scenario-based monitoring-enabled benefits rather than field-verified savings. The results indicate that TEGs are more appropriately regarded as autonomous power sources for intelligent steam-trap monitoring than as primary electricity-generation devices.
期刊介绍:
Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application.
The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.