Frenetic Cat-inspired particle optimization: A Markov state-switching hybrid swarm optimizer with application to cardiac digital twinning

IF 9.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.swevo.2026.102524
Jorge Sánchez, Guadalupe García-Isla, Sandra Perez-Herrero, Beatriz Trenor, Javier Saiz
{"title":"Frenetic Cat-inspired particle optimization: A Markov state-switching hybrid swarm optimizer with application to cardiac digital twinning","authors":"Jorge Sánchez,&nbsp;Guadalupe García-Isla,&nbsp;Sandra Perez-Herrero,&nbsp;Beatriz Trenor,&nbsp;Javier Saiz","doi":"10.1016/j.swevo.2026.102524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Designing optimizers that remain effective under tight evaluation budgets is critical in expensive black-box settings such as cardiac digital twinning. We propose <em>Frenetic Cat-inspired Particle Optimization</em> (FCPO), a hybrid swarm method that couples particle swarm optimization-like dynamics with an explicit-state Markov switching controller to schedule exploration and refinement operators online. FCPO integrates (i) state-conditioned bounded motion, (ii) an elite-difference global jump operator to escape stagnation, (iii) eigen-space guided local refinement from elite covariance, and (iv) linear population size reduction to control late-stage computational cost. We benchmark FCPO on five representative functions from the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2022 suite (F1, F2, F3, F6 and F10) at dimensions <span><math><mrow><mi>D</mi><mo>∈</mo><mrow><mo>{</mo><mn>10,20</mn><mo>}</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> over 30 independent runs, comparing against PSO, CSO, CLPSO, SHADE, L-SHADE, HO and CMA-ES. FCPO achieves the lowest mean runtime across the ten benchmark cases among the full methods (average 0.181<!--> <!-->s). HO, CMA-ES, and L-SHADE required approximately 2.33, 2.39, and 2.56 times the mean runtime of FCPO, respectively, in our Python implementation. Across the eight full methods, the aggregate rank analysis placed CMA-ES first, followed by FCPO, L-SHADE, and HO, with average ranks of 1.90, 3.40, 3.60, and 4.10, respectively. On structured landscapes (F1–F3) and on the hybrid function (F6), CMA-ES remains the most accurate method, while FCPO substantially improves over classical swarms and maintains a favorable accuracy–runtime trade-off. Finally, in a ventricular activation digital twin calibration task, FCPO reaches the target electrocardiogram (ECG) fidelity (RMSE <span><math><mrow><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0.1</mn></mrow></math></span> <!--> <!-->mV) within <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>40</mn></mrow></math></span> iterations and produces physiologically plausible activation maps with robust convergence across repeated initializations, supporting its use as a practical optimizer for expensive inverse problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48682,"journal":{"name":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102524"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650226002440","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Designing optimizers that remain effective under tight evaluation budgets is critical in expensive black-box settings such as cardiac digital twinning. We propose Frenetic Cat-inspired Particle Optimization (FCPO), a hybrid swarm method that couples particle swarm optimization-like dynamics with an explicit-state Markov switching controller to schedule exploration and refinement operators online. FCPO integrates (i) state-conditioned bounded motion, (ii) an elite-difference global jump operator to escape stagnation, (iii) eigen-space guided local refinement from elite covariance, and (iv) linear population size reduction to control late-stage computational cost. We benchmark FCPO on five representative functions from the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2022 suite (F1, F2, F3, F6 and F10) at dimensions D∈{10,20} over 30 independent runs, comparing against PSO, CSO, CLPSO, SHADE, L-SHADE, HO and CMA-ES. FCPO achieves the lowest mean runtime across the ten benchmark cases among the full methods (average 0.181 s). HO, CMA-ES, and L-SHADE required approximately 2.33, 2.39, and 2.56 times the mean runtime of FCPO, respectively, in our Python implementation. Across the eight full methods, the aggregate rank analysis placed CMA-ES first, followed by FCPO, L-SHADE, and HO, with average ranks of 1.90, 3.40, 3.60, and 4.10, respectively. On structured landscapes (F1–F3) and on the hybrid function (F6), CMA-ES remains the most accurate method, while FCPO substantially improves over classical swarms and maintains a favorable accuracy–runtime trade-off. Finally, in a ventricular activation digital twin calibration task, FCPO reaches the target electrocardiogram (ECG) fidelity (RMSE <0.1  mV) within ∼40 iterations and produces physiologically plausible activation maps with robust convergence across repeated initializations, supporting its use as a practical optimizer for expensive inverse problems.
受狂热猫启发的粒子优化:一种应用于心脏数字孪生的马尔可夫状态切换混合群优化器
在昂贵的黑盒环境(如心脏数字孪生)中,设计在紧张的评估预算下仍然有效的优化器至关重要。我们提出了一种混合群算法,将类似粒子群优化的动力学与显式状态马尔可夫切换控制器相结合,在线调度探索和优化算子。FCPO集成了(i)状态约束有界运动,(ii)精英差分全局跳跃算子以避免停滞,(iii)特征空间引导的精英协方差局部细化,以及(iv)线性种群大小缩减以控制后期计算成本。我们对进化计算大会(CEC) 2022套件中的五个代表性函数(F1, F2, F3, F6和F10)在维度D∈{10,20}上进行了30次独立运行的FCPO基准测试,并与PSO, CSO, CLPSO, SHADE, L-SHADE, HO和CMA-ES进行了比较。FCPO在完整方法的十个基准测试案例中实现了最低的平均运行时间(平均0.181秒)。在我们的Python实现中,HO, CMA-ES和L-SHADE分别需要大约2.33,2.39和2.56倍的FCPO平均运行时间。综合排名分析,CMA-ES排名第一,FCPO、L-SHADE和HO排名第二,平均排名分别为1.90、3.40、3.60和4.10。在结构化景观(F1-F3)和混合函数(F6)上,CMA-ES仍然是最准确的方法,而FCPO在精度和运行时间之间保持了良好的平衡。最后,在心室激活数字孪生校准任务中,FCPO在~ 40次迭代内达到目标心电图(ECG)保真度(RMSE <0.1 mV),并在重复初始化中产生具有鲁棒收敛性的生理上合理的激活图,支持其作为昂贵逆问题的实用优化器使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEC-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
169
期刊介绍: Swarm and Evolutionary Computation is a pioneering peer-reviewed journal focused on the latest research and advancements in nature-inspired intelligent computation using swarm and evolutionary algorithms. It covers theoretical, experimental, and practical aspects of these paradigms and their hybrids, promoting interdisciplinary research. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original articles that push the boundaries of evolutionary computation and swarm intelligence. Additionally, it welcomes survey papers on current topics and novel applications. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Genetic Algorithms, and Genetic Programming, Evolution Strategies, and Evolutionary Programming, Differential Evolution, Artificial Immune Systems, Particle Swarms, Ant Colony, Bacterial Foraging, Artificial Bees, Fireflies Algorithm, Harmony Search, Artificial Life, Digital Organisms, Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, Stochastic Diffusion Search, Quantum Computing, Nano Computing, Membrane Computing, Human-centric Computing, Hybridization of Algorithms, Memetic Computing, Autonomic Computing, Self-organizing systems, Combinatorial, Discrete, Binary, Constrained, Multi-objective, Multi-modal, Dynamic, and Large-scale Optimization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书