Assessment of limited-observability state-of-charge prediction for commercial electric vehicle charging infrastructure using a hybrid LSTM-GRU framework

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Jichao Hong, Yulong Qiu, Shikun Ma, Fengwei Liang, Xing He, Jingsong Yang, Baoqiang Zhang, Jiaqi Pei, Lingjun Wei, Haitao Zhang
{"title":"Assessment of limited-observability state-of-charge prediction for commercial electric vehicle charging infrastructure using a hybrid LSTM-GRU framework","authors":"Jichao Hong,&nbsp;Yulong Qiu,&nbsp;Shikun Ma,&nbsp;Fengwei Liang,&nbsp;Xing He,&nbsp;Jingsong Yang,&nbsp;Baoqiang Zhang,&nbsp;Jiaqi Pei,&nbsp;Lingjun Wei,&nbsp;Haitao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2026.105388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate state-of-charge (SOC) prediction supports intelligent electric vehicle charging, but many high-accuracy methods rely on laboratory measurements or vehicle-side data that are unavailable to commercial charging infrastructure. This study assesses whether protocol-restricted charging-pile records can support multi-step prediction of the BMS-reported SOC trajectory under limited observability. The framework combines charging-session segmentation, data cleaning, secondary feature construction, first-order hold interpolation, correlation-based input selection and group-aware sliding-window training. A hybrid long short-term memory-gated recurrent unit model is compared with LSTM, GRU, LSTM-CNN and Transformer baselines. Group-aware training reduces mean absolute error from 0.36% to 0.30% and mean relative error from 0.64% to 0.58%. Under the same evaluation protocol, LSTM-GRU achieves the lowest errors with 16.00% fewer parameters than LSTM. Across the four seasonal subsets, MAE remains below 0.95% and MRE below 1.40%; under Gaussian noise, MAE and MRE are 0.92% and 1.17%, respectively. These results show that charging-pile records can support SOC trajectory prediction for charging management and infrastructure-side monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 105388"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826005746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate state-of-charge (SOC) prediction supports intelligent electric vehicle charging, but many high-accuracy methods rely on laboratory measurements or vehicle-side data that are unavailable to commercial charging infrastructure. This study assesses whether protocol-restricted charging-pile records can support multi-step prediction of the BMS-reported SOC trajectory under limited observability. The framework combines charging-session segmentation, data cleaning, secondary feature construction, first-order hold interpolation, correlation-based input selection and group-aware sliding-window training. A hybrid long short-term memory-gated recurrent unit model is compared with LSTM, GRU, LSTM-CNN and Transformer baselines. Group-aware training reduces mean absolute error from 0.36% to 0.30% and mean relative error from 0.64% to 0.58%. Under the same evaluation protocol, LSTM-GRU achieves the lowest errors with 16.00% fewer parameters than LSTM. Across the four seasonal subsets, MAE remains below 0.95% and MRE below 1.40%; under Gaussian noise, MAE and MRE are 0.92% and 1.17%, respectively. These results show that charging-pile records can support SOC trajectory prediction for charging management and infrastructure-side monitoring.
基于混合LSTM-GRU框架的商用电动汽车充电基础设施有限可观测电量状态预测评估
准确的充电状态(SOC)预测支持智能电动汽车充电,但许多高精度方法依赖于实验室测量或商用充电基础设施无法获得的车辆侧数据。本研究评估了协议限制的充电桩记录是否可以支持在有限可观测性下bms报告的SOC轨迹的多步预测。该框架结合了充电时段分割、数据清洗、二次特征构建、一阶保持器插值、基于相关性的输入选择和群体感知滑动窗口训练。将混合长短期记忆门控循环单元模型与LSTM、GRU、LSTM- cnn和Transformer基线进行了比较。群体意识训练将平均绝对误差从0.36%降低到0.30%,平均相对误差从0.64%降低到0.58%。在相同的评估协议下,LSTM- gru比LSTM的参数少16.00%,误差最小。在四个季节子集中,MAE保持在0.95%以下,MRE保持在1.40%以下;在高斯噪声下,MAE和MRE分别为0.92%和1.17%。这些结果表明,充电桩记录可以为充电管理和基础设施侧监测提供SOC轨迹预测支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书