Multiple pathways to transport decarbonisation: bioethanol and electrification across distinct energy systems

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ana Lucia de Souza Niero, Sarah Mozzaquatro Pasini, Evangelos Kallitsis, Sophie Kempston, Jacqueline Sophie Edge, Sergio Yesid Gómez González, Jonathan Radcliffe, Dachamir Hotza
{"title":"Multiple pathways to transport decarbonisation: bioethanol and electrification across distinct energy systems","authors":"Ana Lucia de Souza Niero,&nbsp;Sarah Mozzaquatro Pasini,&nbsp;Evangelos Kallitsis,&nbsp;Sophie Kempston,&nbsp;Jacqueline Sophie Edge,&nbsp;Sergio Yesid Gómez González,&nbsp;Jonathan Radcliffe,&nbsp;Dachamir Hotza","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2026.105368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transport decarbonisation is critical to achieving net-zero mobility, yet mitigation pathways vary globally. This study presents a regionalised life-cycle assessment using the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (GREET) model to investigate how contrasting energy systems influence environmental performance across Southern Brazil, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (USA) Midwest over a 200,000 km vehicle lifetime. Results show that decarbonisation pathways cannot be universally prioritised and must align with regional grid characteristics. Compared with gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles, battery electric vehicles reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 47–70%, depending on the energy system. However, ethanol-fuelled vehicles in Brazil achieve emissions comparable to electric vehicles operating in fossil-intensive grids, highlighting low-carbon biofuels as a strong regional alternative. The proposed framework provides vital decision-support insights for designing context-specific transport policies based on regional fuel production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 105368"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826005540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transport decarbonisation is critical to achieving net-zero mobility, yet mitigation pathways vary globally. This study presents a regionalised life-cycle assessment using the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (GREET) model to investigate how contrasting energy systems influence environmental performance across Southern Brazil, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (USA) Midwest over a 200,000 km vehicle lifetime. Results show that decarbonisation pathways cannot be universally prioritised and must align with regional grid characteristics. Compared with gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles, battery electric vehicles reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 47–70%, depending on the energy system. However, ethanol-fuelled vehicles in Brazil achieve emissions comparable to electric vehicles operating in fossil-intensive grids, highlighting low-carbon biofuels as a strong regional alternative. The proposed framework provides vital decision-support insights for designing context-specific transport policies based on regional fuel production.

Abstract Image

多种途径传输脱碳:跨不同能源系统的生物乙醇和电气化
交通运输脱碳对于实现净零出行至关重要,但缓解途径在全球各不相同。本研究采用温室气体、管制排放和技术中的能源使用(GREET)模型进行了区域生命周期评估,以调查不同能源系统如何影响巴西南部、英国(UK)和美国(USA)中西部地区20万公里车辆寿命的环境绩效。结果表明,脱碳途径不能普遍优先考虑,必须与区域网格特征保持一致。与汽油内燃机汽车相比,电池电动汽车可减少47-70%的温室气体排放,具体取决于能源系统。然而,在巴西,乙醇燃料汽车的排放量与在化石密集型电网中运行的电动汽车相当,这突显出低碳生物燃料是一个强大的地区替代品。提出的框架为设计基于区域燃料生产的特定环境运输政策提供了重要的决策支持见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书