Quantifying vegetation recovery under different reforestation practices using time series analysis: a case study in Cyprus

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115353
Maria Prodromou, Ioannis Gitas, Christodoulos Mettas, Marios Tzouvaras, Diofantos Hadjimitsis
{"title":"Quantifying vegetation recovery under different reforestation practices using time series analysis: a case study in Cyprus","authors":"Maria Prodromou,&nbsp;Ioannis Gitas,&nbsp;Christodoulos Mettas,&nbsp;Marios Tzouvaras,&nbsp;Diofantos Hadjimitsis","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, wildfires have increased in frequency, intensity, and spatial extent, causing extensive ecological damage and emphasizing the necessity for effective post-fire restoration measures. Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies offer an efficient and reliable way to monitor landscape recovery over long periods, supporting both research and forest management. This study explores the contribution of EO methods in evaluating reforestation actions implemented after the 2016 Solea fire in Cyprus, a representative wildfire event in the Troodos region, dominated by <em>Pinus brutia</em> forest stands. Using a 12-year Landsat-based Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) time series (2013–2024), complemented by climatic and topographic variables harmonized to a common analysis grid, this study assesses vegetation recovery under five restoration approaches: Planting, Terraces, Sowing, Spot Sowing, and Natural Regeneration. Recovery dynamics were assessed through established indicators, including the Relative Recovery Index (RRI) and Year-to-Year (YrYr) slopes. Our findings indicate that areas restored through planting and terraces were associated with faster and more consistent vegetation recovery than areas undergoing natural regeneration. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that fire severity and pre-fire vegetation condition were the most influential determinants of post-fire regrowth, and that linear regression models provided the strongest predictive performance. By combining EO time series with ecological insights, this work highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different restoration practices and provides evidence-based guidance for future forest recovery planning in fire-prone Mediterranean landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115353"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26007545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, wildfires have increased in frequency, intensity, and spatial extent, causing extensive ecological damage and emphasizing the necessity for effective post-fire restoration measures. Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies offer an efficient and reliable way to monitor landscape recovery over long periods, supporting both research and forest management. This study explores the contribution of EO methods in evaluating reforestation actions implemented after the 2016 Solea fire in Cyprus, a representative wildfire event in the Troodos region, dominated by Pinus brutia forest stands. Using a 12-year Landsat-based Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) time series (2013–2024), complemented by climatic and topographic variables harmonized to a common analysis grid, this study assesses vegetation recovery under five restoration approaches: Planting, Terraces, Sowing, Spot Sowing, and Natural Regeneration. Recovery dynamics were assessed through established indicators, including the Relative Recovery Index (RRI) and Year-to-Year (YrYr) slopes. Our findings indicate that areas restored through planting and terraces were associated with faster and more consistent vegetation recovery than areas undergoing natural regeneration. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that fire severity and pre-fire vegetation condition were the most influential determinants of post-fire regrowth, and that linear regression models provided the strongest predictive performance. By combining EO time series with ecological insights, this work highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different restoration practices and provides evidence-based guidance for future forest recovery planning in fire-prone Mediterranean landscapes.
利用时间序列分析量化不同再造林做法下的植被恢复:塞浦路斯案例研究
近几十年来,森林火灾的发生频率、强度和空间范围都在增加,造成了广泛的生态破坏,强调了采取有效的火灾后恢复措施的必要性。地球观测(EO)和遥感(RS)技术为长期监测景观恢复提供了一种有效和可靠的方法,为研究和森林管理提供了支持。本研究探讨了EO方法在评估2016年塞浦路斯Solea火灾后实施的再造林行动中的贡献,这是Troodos地区的一个代表性野火事件,主要是油松林分。利用12年基于landsat的归一化燃烧比(NBR)时间序列(2013-2024),辅以统一的气候和地形变量分析网格,本研究评估了五种恢复方法下的植被恢复情况:种植、梯田、播种、点播和自然再生。恢复动态通过既定指标进行评估,包括相对恢复指数(RRI)和年-年(YrYr)斜率。我们的研究结果表明,通过种植和梯田恢复的地区比自然更新的地区植被恢复得更快、更一致。统计分析还表明,火灾严重程度和火灾前植被状况是影响火灾后再生的最重要因素,线性回归模型的预测效果最强。通过将EO时间序列与生态学见解相结合,本工作突出了不同恢复实践的优缺点,并为未来易发生火灾的地中海景观的森林恢复规划提供了基于证据的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书