Maria Prodromou, Ioannis Gitas, Christodoulos Mettas, Marios Tzouvaras, Diofantos Hadjimitsis
{"title":"Quantifying vegetation recovery under different reforestation practices using time series analysis: a case study in Cyprus","authors":"Maria Prodromou, Ioannis Gitas, Christodoulos Mettas, Marios Tzouvaras, Diofantos Hadjimitsis","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, wildfires have increased in frequency, intensity, and spatial extent, causing extensive ecological damage and emphasizing the necessity for effective post-fire restoration measures. Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies offer an efficient and reliable way to monitor landscape recovery over long periods, supporting both research and forest management. This study explores the contribution of EO methods in evaluating reforestation actions implemented after the 2016 Solea fire in Cyprus, a representative wildfire event in the Troodos region, dominated by <em>Pinus brutia</em> forest stands. Using a 12-year Landsat-based Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) time series (2013–2024), complemented by climatic and topographic variables harmonized to a common analysis grid, this study assesses vegetation recovery under five restoration approaches: Planting, Terraces, Sowing, Spot Sowing, and Natural Regeneration. Recovery dynamics were assessed through established indicators, including the Relative Recovery Index (RRI) and Year-to-Year (YrYr) slopes. Our findings indicate that areas restored through planting and terraces were associated with faster and more consistent vegetation recovery than areas undergoing natural regeneration. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that fire severity and pre-fire vegetation condition were the most influential determinants of post-fire regrowth, and that linear regression models provided the strongest predictive performance. By combining EO time series with ecological insights, this work highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different restoration practices and provides evidence-based guidance for future forest recovery planning in fire-prone Mediterranean landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115353"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26007545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent decades, wildfires have increased in frequency, intensity, and spatial extent, causing extensive ecological damage and emphasizing the necessity for effective post-fire restoration measures. Earth Observation (EO) and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies offer an efficient and reliable way to monitor landscape recovery over long periods, supporting both research and forest management. This study explores the contribution of EO methods in evaluating reforestation actions implemented after the 2016 Solea fire in Cyprus, a representative wildfire event in the Troodos region, dominated by Pinus brutia forest stands. Using a 12-year Landsat-based Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) time series (2013–2024), complemented by climatic and topographic variables harmonized to a common analysis grid, this study assesses vegetation recovery under five restoration approaches: Planting, Terraces, Sowing, Spot Sowing, and Natural Regeneration. Recovery dynamics were assessed through established indicators, including the Relative Recovery Index (RRI) and Year-to-Year (YrYr) slopes. Our findings indicate that areas restored through planting and terraces were associated with faster and more consistent vegetation recovery than areas undergoing natural regeneration. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that fire severity and pre-fire vegetation condition were the most influential determinants of post-fire regrowth, and that linear regression models provided the strongest predictive performance. By combining EO time series with ecological insights, this work highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different restoration practices and provides evidence-based guidance for future forest recovery planning in fire-prone Mediterranean landscapes.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.