Machteld Catharina Simoens, Caroline Hélène Dabard, Jonathan Friedrich, Juan Garzon, Felix Zoll
{"title":"Cultivating social innovation for agri-food sustainability transformations: a literature review","authors":"Machteld Catharina Simoens, Caroline Hélène Dabard, Jonathan Friedrich, Juan Garzon, Felix Zoll","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping literature review focuses on the operation and orientation of social innovations (SI) in agri-food systems, in order to understand their role in sustainability transformations. Its main objective is to analyze and synthesize the types of cases studied in SI literature, with a specific focus on what is reported regarding their characteristics, how they form relations, the societal problems they respond to and their contributions to transformation processes. The review is based on 86 empirical English articles published in Scopus and Web of Science between 2013 and 2023, covering 168 empirical SI cases. The data reveal limited geographical variation and a Eurocentric focus in the study of SI, but diverse spatial and operational foci of SI cases. We identify seven SI types: community food networks, food equity initiatives, capacity-building programs, agri-cooperatives, social agri-enterprises, agri-environmental initiatives, and tech-driven agri-services. These often-localized solutions address different internal and external relations, aim to respond to a variety of societal needs and problems, and are rhetorically linked to transformations of various kinds. In addition to providing insights into key trends in the operation and orientation of SI, this analysis contributes to the discussion on the transformative potential of SI, including the ambivalent role of strong ties between SI and the state. Furthermore, this study identifies potential research avenues for the study of SI in agriculture and food with a particular focus on rural places. In particular, we call for reflexivity in researchers' normative assumptions, more rigorous reporting of relations and transformative contributions, and more systematic approaches to better integrate findings across SI cases as well as with adjacent concepts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104387"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074301672600389X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This scoping literature review focuses on the operation and orientation of social innovations (SI) in agri-food systems, in order to understand their role in sustainability transformations. Its main objective is to analyze and synthesize the types of cases studied in SI literature, with a specific focus on what is reported regarding their characteristics, how they form relations, the societal problems they respond to and their contributions to transformation processes. The review is based on 86 empirical English articles published in Scopus and Web of Science between 2013 and 2023, covering 168 empirical SI cases. The data reveal limited geographical variation and a Eurocentric focus in the study of SI, but diverse spatial and operational foci of SI cases. We identify seven SI types: community food networks, food equity initiatives, capacity-building programs, agri-cooperatives, social agri-enterprises, agri-environmental initiatives, and tech-driven agri-services. These often-localized solutions address different internal and external relations, aim to respond to a variety of societal needs and problems, and are rhetorically linked to transformations of various kinds. In addition to providing insights into key trends in the operation and orientation of SI, this analysis contributes to the discussion on the transformative potential of SI, including the ambivalent role of strong ties between SI and the state. Furthermore, this study identifies potential research avenues for the study of SI in agriculture and food with a particular focus on rural places. In particular, we call for reflexivity in researchers' normative assumptions, more rigorous reporting of relations and transformative contributions, and more systematic approaches to better integrate findings across SI cases as well as with adjacent concepts.
这一范围的文献综述侧重于农业食品系统中的社会创新(SI)的运作和方向,以了解它们在可持续性转型中的作用。其主要目标是分析和综合科学探究文献中研究的案例类型,特别关注它们的特征、它们如何形成关系、它们所应对的社会问题以及它们对转型过程的贡献。该综述基于2013年至2023年间发表在Scopus和Web of Science上的86篇实证英语文章,涵盖168个实证科学探究案例。这些数据表明,科学研究的地理差异有限,且以欧洲为中心,但科学研究案例的空间和操作焦点却各不相同。我们确定了7种SI类型:社区粮食网络、粮食公平倡议、能力建设计划、农业合作社、社会农业企业、农业环境倡议和技术驱动的农业服务。这些通常是本地化的解决方案处理不同的内部和外部关系,旨在回应各种社会需求和问题,并在修辞上与各种转型联系在一起。除了提供关于科学研究运作和方向的关键趋势的见解外,该分析还有助于讨论科学研究的变革潜力,包括科学研究与国家之间紧密联系的矛盾作用。此外,本研究确定了农业和食品科学研究的潜在研究途径,特别关注农村地区。特别是,我们呼吁研究者的规范性假设具有反思性,更严格地报告关系和变革性贡献,以及更系统的方法来更好地整合科学探究案例以及相邻概念的发现。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.