Effects of maternal Moringa oleifera–royal jelly supplementation on the infant gut microbiota at six months in rural Indonesia

IF 1.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2026.102463
Syamsul Alam, Veni Hadju, Ansariadi, Nurhaedar Jafar, Muh Tahir Abdullah, Syamsuar Manyullei
{"title":"Effects of maternal Moringa oleifera–royal jelly supplementation on the infant gut microbiota at six months in rural Indonesia","authors":"Syamsul Alam,&nbsp;Veni Hadju,&nbsp;Ansariadi,&nbsp;Nurhaedar Jafar,&nbsp;Muh Tahir Abdullah,&nbsp;Syamsuar Manyullei","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2026.102463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Maternal nutrition during pregnancy influences the early establishment of the infant gut microbiota, yet the impact of food-based interventions combining <em>Moringa oleifera</em> and royal jelly, particularly in low-resource settings such as Indonesia, remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of maternal <em>Moringa oleifera</em>–royal jelly (MRJ) supplementation during pregnancy on the abundance of five predefined infant gut bacterial genera at six months of age.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A follow-up randomized controlled trial involving 88 mother–infant pairs was conducted in rural Banggai, Indonesia. Pregnant women received either MRJ or multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) from the second trimester until delivery. Infant fecal samples collected at six months were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR targeting five dominant bacterial genera (<em>Bifidobacterium</em>, <em>Lactobacillus</em>, <em>Bacteroides</em>, <em>Clostridium</em>, and <em>Escherichia coli</em>). Associations were examined using generalized linear models adjusted for maternal, infant, environmental, and breastfeeding-related factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The infant gut microbiota was dominated by <em>Bifidobacterium</em> and <em>Lactobacillus</em>, with a higher combined abundance of beneficial than opportunistic genera (p = 0.0017). No significant differences in genus-level abundance were observed between MRJ and MMS groups. In adjusted generalized linear models, MRJ supplementation was not associated with any of the five assessed genera (all p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Maternal MRJ supplementation was not associated with differences in the abundance of the five assessed bacterial genera at six months compared with MMS. These findings suggest that MRJ may serve as a safe food-based strategy that complements MMS within antenatal nutrition programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 102463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398426001788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maternal nutrition during pregnancy influences the early establishment of the infant gut microbiota, yet the impact of food-based interventions combining Moringa oleifera and royal jelly, particularly in low-resource settings such as Indonesia, remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of maternal Moringa oleifera–royal jelly (MRJ) supplementation during pregnancy on the abundance of five predefined infant gut bacterial genera at six months of age.

Methods

A follow-up randomized controlled trial involving 88 mother–infant pairs was conducted in rural Banggai, Indonesia. Pregnant women received either MRJ or multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) from the second trimester until delivery. Infant fecal samples collected at six months were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR targeting five dominant bacterial genera (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Escherichia coli). Associations were examined using generalized linear models adjusted for maternal, infant, environmental, and breastfeeding-related factors.

Results

The infant gut microbiota was dominated by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, with a higher combined abundance of beneficial than opportunistic genera (p = 0.0017). No significant differences in genus-level abundance were observed between MRJ and MMS groups. In adjusted generalized linear models, MRJ supplementation was not associated with any of the five assessed genera (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Maternal MRJ supplementation was not associated with differences in the abundance of the five assessed bacterial genera at six months compared with MMS. These findings suggest that MRJ may serve as a safe food-based strategy that complements MMS within antenatal nutrition programs.
在印度尼西亚农村,母亲补充辣木-蜂王浆对6个月婴儿肠道微生物群的影响
背景怀孕期间的母亲营养会影响婴儿肠道微生物群的早期形成,然而,结合辣木和蜂王浆的食物干预措施的影响,特别是在印度尼西亚等资源匮乏的环境中,仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在评估妊娠期母体补充辣木-蜂王浆(MRJ)对6月龄婴儿肠道5种预先确定的细菌属丰度的影响。方法在印度尼西亚邦盖农村对88对母婴进行随访随机对照试验。从妊娠中期到分娩,孕妇接受MRJ或多种微量营养素补充剂(MMS)。6个月时收集的婴儿粪便样本采用实时荧光定量PCR对5个优势菌属(双歧杆菌、乳杆菌、拟杆菌、梭状芽孢杆菌和大肠杆菌)进行分析。使用广义线性模型对母亲、婴儿、环境和母乳喂养相关因素进行调整,对相关性进行检验。结果婴儿肠道菌群以双歧杆菌和乳杆菌为主,有益菌的总丰度高于机会菌(p = 0.0017)。MRJ组和MMS组在属水平上的丰度没有显著差异。在调整后的广义线性模型中,补充MRJ与五种评估属中的任何一种都没有关联(p均为 >; 0.05)。结论与MMS相比,母体补充MRJ与6个月时5种被评估细菌属的丰度差异无关。这些发现表明MRJ可以作为一种安全的基于食物的策略,在产前营养计划中补充MMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书