A Novel Invasive Hemodynamic Parameter (V′) to Predict Hemodynamic Response to Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

IF 3.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Structural Heart Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2026.101069
Maryam Muhammad Ali Majeed-Saidan MD, Shivabalan Kathavarayan Ramu MD, Besir Besir MD, Odette Iskandar MD, James Yun MD, Rhonda Miyasaka MD, Amar Krishnaswamy MD, Serge Harb MD, Samir R. Kapadia MD
{"title":"A Novel Invasive Hemodynamic Parameter (V′) to Predict Hemodynamic Response to Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair","authors":"Maryam Muhammad Ali Majeed-Saidan MD,&nbsp;Shivabalan Kathavarayan Ramu MD,&nbsp;Besir Besir MD,&nbsp;Odette Iskandar MD,&nbsp;James Yun MD,&nbsp;Rhonda Miyasaka MD,&nbsp;Amar Krishnaswamy MD,&nbsp;Serge Harb MD,&nbsp;Samir R. Kapadia MD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2026.101069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left atrial (LA) V-wave amplitude can be higher with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, mitral regurgitation (MR), or both. This may cause hemodynamic and echocardiographic discordance when assessing MR. Identifying more specific hemodynamic correlates to MR severity helps in the setting of discordance. We examined the amplitude of the V-wave relative to the LA mean pressure following the reduction in MR after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 231 patients who underwent M-TEER between 2019 and 2022 with reliable intraprocedural invasive hemodynamic waveforms were included. LA mean and V-wave pressures were measured pre- and post-M-TEER. V′ was calculated as follows: (V′ = V-wave – mean pressure).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our cohort (median age 79) included 65% and 35% patients with primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), respectively. LA mean, V-wave, and V′ pressures decreased significantly after M-TEER in both groups. SMR patients had higher LA pressures after M-TEER. Baseline and post–M-TEER V′ did not differ among groups. In the overall cohort, pre– and post–M-TEER V′ were significantly higher in patients with &gt;2+ residual MR compared to ≤2+ MR. Patients with post–M-TEER V′ &gt;13 mmHg had worse composite outcomes of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.68-5.4; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>M-TEER decreased LA mean, V-wave, and V′ pressures in PMR and SMR. Postprocedural V′ provides a useful measure of residual MR and clinical outcomes and guides the adequacy of M-TEER.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"10 9","pages":"Article 101069"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870626002782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Left atrial (LA) V-wave amplitude can be higher with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, mitral regurgitation (MR), or both. This may cause hemodynamic and echocardiographic discordance when assessing MR. Identifying more specific hemodynamic correlates to MR severity helps in the setting of discordance. We examined the amplitude of the V-wave relative to the LA mean pressure following the reduction in MR after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER).

Methods

A total of 231 patients who underwent M-TEER between 2019 and 2022 with reliable intraprocedural invasive hemodynamic waveforms were included. LA mean and V-wave pressures were measured pre- and post-M-TEER. V′ was calculated as follows: (V′ = V-wave – mean pressure).

Results

Our cohort (median age 79) included 65% and 35% patients with primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), respectively. LA mean, V-wave, and V′ pressures decreased significantly after M-TEER in both groups. SMR patients had higher LA pressures after M-TEER. Baseline and post–M-TEER V′ did not differ among groups. In the overall cohort, pre– and post–M-TEER V′ were significantly higher in patients with >2+ residual MR compared to ≤2+ MR. Patients with post–M-TEER V′ >13 mmHg had worse composite outcomes of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.68-5.4; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

M-TEER decreased LA mean, V-wave, and V′ pressures in PMR and SMR. Postprocedural V′ provides a useful measure of residual MR and clinical outcomes and guides the adequacy of M-TEER.
一种新的有创血流动力学参数(V ')预测二尖瓣经导管边缘对边缘修复的血流动力学反应
背景左房(LA) v波振幅可随着左室舒张末期压升高、二尖瓣返流(MR)或两者同时升高而升高。在评估MR时,这可能导致血流动力学和超声心动图不一致。识别更具体的血流动力学与MR严重程度相关有助于不一致的设置。我们检测了经二尖瓣边缘到边缘修复(M-TEER)后MR降低后相对于LA平均压力的v波振幅。方法纳入2019年至2022年期间接受M-TEER治疗的231例可靠的术中有创血流动力学波形患者。在m - teer前后分别测量LA平均和v波压力。V ‘的计算公式如下:(V ’ = V波-平均压力)。结果我们的队列(中位年龄79岁)分别包括65%和35%的原发性二尖瓣反流(PMR)和继发性二尖瓣反流(SMR)患者。两组患者经M-TEER后LA均值、V波压和V′压均显著降低。SMR患者在M-TEER后LA压升高。各组间基线和m - teer后V′无差异。在整个队列中,与≤2+ MR的患者相比,残余MR≤2+的患者m - teer前和m - teer后的V′显著高于残余MR≤2+的患者m - teer后V′= 13 mmHg的患者心力衰竭住院或全因死亡率的综合结果更差(风险比:3.01;95% CI: 1.68-5.4; p < 0.001)。结论m - teer降低了PMR和SMR患者的LA平均值、V波压和V′压。术后V '提供了残留MR和临床结果的有用测量,并指导M-TEER的充分性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书