Suicidal ideation across pregnancy and the postpartum: Trajectories and assessment with commonly used screening tools

Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.xjmad.2026.100203
Rachel Vanderkruik, Courtney C. Louis, Peter Gaccione, Robert Gallop, Emma J. Grassi, Parker C. Killenberg, Hannah E. Yoon, Marlene P. Freeman, Sona Dimidjian, Lee S. Cohen
{"title":"Suicidal ideation across pregnancy and the postpartum: Trajectories and assessment with commonly used screening tools","authors":"Rachel Vanderkruik,&nbsp;Courtney C. Louis,&nbsp;Peter Gaccione,&nbsp;Robert Gallop,&nbsp;Emma J. Grassi,&nbsp;Parker C. Killenberg,&nbsp;Hannah E. Yoon,&nbsp;Marlene P. Freeman,&nbsp;Sona Dimidjian,&nbsp;Lee S. Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2026.100203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Suicidal ideation (SI) is a public health concern that remains poorly characterized during the perinatal period. It is most often assessed by the final items in two depression screening instruments, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). We sought to examine and compare SI trajectories identified by these measures and their changes from pregnancy to postpartum. This study reports on data from a supplemental study to the Understanding and Preventing Women’s Relapse of Depression (UPWARD) study on perinatal depression (NIMH, NCT03623620; supplement entitled UPWARD-S). Participants were ineligible for UPWARD if they endorsed SI at baseline; but eligible for UPWARD-S if they were pregnant and had a history of major depressive disorder. Participants in UPWARD-S (N = 38) completed phone interviews and surveys from pregnancy through six months postpartum. Group-based trajectory modeling was conducted during pregnancy and postpartum using item 10 of the EPDS and item 9 of the PHQ-9. Trajectory analyses resulted in three group models. For both time periods, there were two groups showing relatively stable trajectories in the frequency of SI endorsement, one high and one low. During pregnancy, a third group began high and declined, and, during postpartum, a third group began low and increased. Trajectory patterns were broadly similar across items; however, the proportion of participants classified within each group differed by measure. Our findings demonstrated distinct and relatively stable trajectories and modest agreement between items. Findings from this study could inform larger studies to advise perinatal screening and intervention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004426000386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicidal ideation (SI) is a public health concern that remains poorly characterized during the perinatal period. It is most often assessed by the final items in two depression screening instruments, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). We sought to examine and compare SI trajectories identified by these measures and their changes from pregnancy to postpartum. This study reports on data from a supplemental study to the Understanding and Preventing Women’s Relapse of Depression (UPWARD) study on perinatal depression (NIMH, NCT03623620; supplement entitled UPWARD-S). Participants were ineligible for UPWARD if they endorsed SI at baseline; but eligible for UPWARD-S if they were pregnant and had a history of major depressive disorder. Participants in UPWARD-S (N = 38) completed phone interviews and surveys from pregnancy through six months postpartum. Group-based trajectory modeling was conducted during pregnancy and postpartum using item 10 of the EPDS and item 9 of the PHQ-9. Trajectory analyses resulted in three group models. For both time periods, there were two groups showing relatively stable trajectories in the frequency of SI endorsement, one high and one low. During pregnancy, a third group began high and declined, and, during postpartum, a third group began low and increased. Trajectory patterns were broadly similar across items; however, the proportion of participants classified within each group differed by measure. Our findings demonstrated distinct and relatively stable trajectories and modest agreement between items. Findings from this study could inform larger studies to advise perinatal screening and intervention strategies.
怀孕和产后的自杀意念:轨迹和常用筛查工具的评估
自杀意念(SI)是一个公共卫生问题,在围产期仍然缺乏特征。最常见的是通过两个抑郁筛查工具的最后项目来评估,爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)。我们试图检查和比较通过这些措施确定的SI轨迹及其从怀孕到产后的变化。本研究报告了围产期抑郁症的理解和预防妇女抑郁复发(向上)研究(NIMH, NCT03623620;补充标题为UPWARD- s)的补充研究数据。如果参与者在基线时认可SI,则不符合upup的资格;但如果她们怀孕了,并且有严重的抑郁症病史,就有资格参加“向上”计划。UPWARD-S的参与者(N = 38)完成了从怀孕到产后6个月的电话访谈和调查。采用EPDS第10项和PHQ-9项分别在妊娠期和产后进行分组轨迹建模。轨迹分析得到三组模型。在这两个时期,有两组在SI认可频率上显示出相对稳定的轨迹,一个高一个低。在怀孕期间,第三组开始高,然后下降,在产后,第三组开始低,然后增加。不同项目的轨迹模式大致相似;然而,每组参与者的比例因测量而不同。我们的研究结果显示了不同且相对稳定的轨迹和项目之间的适度一致性。这项研究的结果可以为更大规模的研究提供信息,以建议围产期筛查和干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书