Temporal trajectories of age at breast cancer diagnosis by socioeconomic and geographic factors: a 1975-2021 SEER analysis.

IF 2.1
Soo Youn Bae, Chai Won Kim, Jehyun Chin, Jin Ah Lee, Dooreh Kim, Young Joo Lee, Chang Ik Yoon, Woo-Chan Park
{"title":"Temporal trajectories of age at breast cancer diagnosis by socioeconomic and geographic factors: a 1975-2021 SEER analysis.","authors":"Soo Youn Bae, Chai Won Kim, Jehyun Chin, Jin Ah Lee, Dooreh Kim, Young Joo Lee, Chang Ik Yoon, Woo-Chan Park","doi":"10.1007/s10552-026-02247-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While overall breast cancer incidence and survival trends are well-documented, long-term shifts in age at diagnosis across diverse sociodemographic groups remain poorly understood. This study quantified stage-specific temporal changes in diagnostic age across racial, socioeconomic, and geographic subgroups over four decades to identify widening \"diagnostic age gaps\" and inform equitable screening policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed SEER 8 data (1975-2021) from 696,960 women with Stage I-III breast cancer. Annual mean age at diagnosis and rates of change (β1) were estimated using weighted ordinary least squares regression, stratified by stage, race, census tract-level income quartiles (Q1-Q4), and rural-urban continuum codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean age at diagnosis increased from 60.7 to 62.7 years. Black women showed the steepest annual increases in diagnostic age across all stages, yet remained younger at diagnosis than White women throughout the study period. However, a stark divergence was observed by income: high-income groups (Q4) showed significant increases, while low-income groups (Q1) and rural populations exhibited stagnant or declining diagnostic ages (e.g., Q1 Stage II β1= - 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upward shift in breast cancer diagnostic age is largely absent among low-income and rural populations but present in higher-income, metropolitan groups. Black women showed the steepest increases yet remained the youngest at diagnosis. Equitable, subgroup-specific screening strategies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520579,"journal":{"name":"Cancer causes & control : CCC","volume":"37 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer causes & control : CCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-026-02247-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While overall breast cancer incidence and survival trends are well-documented, long-term shifts in age at diagnosis across diverse sociodemographic groups remain poorly understood. This study quantified stage-specific temporal changes in diagnostic age across racial, socioeconomic, and geographic subgroups over four decades to identify widening "diagnostic age gaps" and inform equitable screening policies.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed SEER 8 data (1975-2021) from 696,960 women with Stage I-III breast cancer. Annual mean age at diagnosis and rates of change (β1) were estimated using weighted ordinary least squares regression, stratified by stage, race, census tract-level income quartiles (Q1-Q4), and rural-urban continuum codes.

Results: The overall mean age at diagnosis increased from 60.7 to 62.7 years. Black women showed the steepest annual increases in diagnostic age across all stages, yet remained younger at diagnosis than White women throughout the study period. However, a stark divergence was observed by income: high-income groups (Q4) showed significant increases, while low-income groups (Q1) and rural populations exhibited stagnant or declining diagnostic ages (e.g., Q1 Stage II β1= - 0.028).

Conclusions: The upward shift in breast cancer diagnostic age is largely absent among low-income and rural populations but present in higher-income, metropolitan groups. Black women showed the steepest increases yet remained the youngest at diagnosis. Equitable, subgroup-specific screening strategies are needed.

受社会经济和地理因素影响的乳腺癌诊断年龄的时间轨迹:1975-2021年SEER分析
目的:虽然乳腺癌的总体发病率和生存趋势有充分的记录,但不同社会人口群体诊断年龄的长期变化仍然知之甚少。本研究量化了四十年来不同种族、社会经济和地理亚组中诊断年龄的阶段性时间变化,以确定不断扩大的“诊断年龄差距”,并为公平的筛查政策提供信息。方法:这项回顾性队列研究分析了来自696,960名I-III期乳腺癌妇女的SEER 8数据(1975-2021)。采用加权普通最小二乘回归,按阶段、种族、人口普查区收入四分位数(Q1-Q4)和城乡连续体代码分层,估计诊断时的年平均年龄和变化率(β1)。结果:总体平均诊断年龄从60.7岁增加到62.7岁。在所有阶段,黑人女性在诊断年龄上的年增长幅度最大,但在整个研究期间,黑人女性在诊断时仍比白人女性年轻。然而,在收入方面出现了明显的差异:高收入群体(第四季度)表现出显著的增长,而低收入群体(第一季度)和农村人口表现出停滞或下降的诊断年龄(例如,第一季度第二阶段β1= - 0.028)。结论:乳腺癌诊断年龄的上升在低收入和农村人群中基本不存在,但在高收入的大都市人群中存在。黑人女性患病人数增长最快,但仍是最年轻的。需要公平的、针对亚群体的筛查策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书