Navigating Emergency Care After Injury: A Qualitative Study of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in England and Wales Using the Candidacy Framework (BE SURE Study).

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ashrafunnesa Khanom, Lydia Jones, Hanifah M Khanom, Fadi Baghdadi, Ann John, Alison Porter, Helen Snooks, Niroshan Siriwardena, Julia Williams, Thanuja Hettiarachchi, Solmaz Safari
{"title":"Navigating Emergency Care After Injury: A Qualitative Study of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in England and Wales Using the Candidacy Framework (BE SURE Study).","authors":"Ashrafunnesa Khanom, Lydia Jones, Hanifah M Khanom, Fadi Baghdadi, Ann John, Alison Porter, Helen Snooks, Niroshan Siriwardena, Julia Williams, Thanuja Hettiarachchi, Solmaz Safari","doi":"10.1111/hex.70861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) face significant challenges when accessing emergency and pre-hospital care following injury. Language barriers, unfamiliarity with service pathways and limited trust in authorities hinder access to emergency services. We report results of focus groups with asylum seekers and refugees who have accessed emergency services to understand their use of services and care received.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited participants through community organisations and support networks which advocate and support asylum seekers and refugees across four areas in England and Wales. We gained informed consent to record and transcribe all focus groups. We applied framework analysis to map emergent qualitative themes onto the seven domains of the Candidacy Framework, in order to examine how access to services was recognised, navigated, and negotiated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report findings from 35 participants, who demonstrated the ability to recognise situations when emergency care was required, yet their ability to seek help was shaped by uncertainty, fear, and experiences of exclusion. Cultural norms, immigration status, and systemic barriers including complex service pathways and financial constraints affected perceptions of eligibility and influenced help-seeking after injury. Communication difficulties were the most persistent challenge, cutting across all candidacy domains and compounding existing vulnerabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights persistent inequities in access to emergency care for asylum seekers and refugees following injury in England and Wales. Using the Candidacy Framework, it demonstrates how language barriers, uncertainty about entitlements, and structural constraints shape how individuals recognise need, navigate services, and experience emergency care. Addressing these challenges requires embedding equity within emergency care systems through improved communication, navigation support, and sensitivity to the lived realities of asylum seekers and refugees.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) face significant challenges when accessing emergency and pre-hospital care following injury. Language barriers, unfamiliarity with service pathways and limited trust in authorities hinder access to emergency services. We report results of focus groups with asylum seekers and refugees who have accessed emergency services to understand their use of services and care received.

Method: We recruited participants through community organisations and support networks which advocate and support asylum seekers and refugees across four areas in England and Wales. We gained informed consent to record and transcribe all focus groups. We applied framework analysis to map emergent qualitative themes onto the seven domains of the Candidacy Framework, in order to examine how access to services was recognised, navigated, and negotiated.

Results: We report findings from 35 participants, who demonstrated the ability to recognise situations when emergency care was required, yet their ability to seek help was shaped by uncertainty, fear, and experiences of exclusion. Cultural norms, immigration status, and systemic barriers including complex service pathways and financial constraints affected perceptions of eligibility and influenced help-seeking after injury. Communication difficulties were the most persistent challenge, cutting across all candidacy domains and compounding existing vulnerabilities.

Conclusion: This study highlights persistent inequities in access to emergency care for asylum seekers and refugees following injury in England and Wales. Using the Candidacy Framework, it demonstrates how language barriers, uncertainty about entitlements, and structural constraints shape how individuals recognise need, navigate services, and experience emergency care. Addressing these challenges requires embedding equity within emergency care systems through improved communication, navigation support, and sensitivity to the lived realities of asylum seekers and refugees.

受伤后的紧急护理导航:使用候选资格框架对英格兰和威尔士寻求庇护者和难民的定性研究(BE SURE研究)。
背景:寻求庇护者和难民(ASRs)在受伤后获得急诊和院前护理时面临重大挑战。语言障碍、不熟悉服务途径以及对当局的信任有限阻碍了获得紧急服务。我们报告了利用紧急服务的寻求庇护者和难民焦点小组的结果,以了解他们对服务的使用情况和得到的照顾。方法:我们通过在英格兰和威尔士的四个地区倡导和支持寻求庇护者和难民的社区组织和支持网络招募参与者。我们获得了记录和转录所有焦点小组的知情同意。我们应用框架分析将新兴的定性主题映射到候选资格框架的七个领域,以研究如何识别、导航和谈判获得服务。结果:我们报告了来自35名参与者的研究结果,他们表现出识别需要紧急护理的情况的能力,但他们寻求帮助的能力受到不确定性、恐惧和排斥经历的影响。文化规范、移民身份和系统障碍,包括复杂的服务途径和财政限制,影响了对资格的看法,并影响了受伤后的求助。沟通困难是最持久的挑战,跨越了所有候选领域,并加剧了现有的脆弱性。结论:这项研究突出表明,在英格兰和威尔士,寻求庇护者和难民受伤后获得紧急护理的机会一直不平等。利用候选资格框架,它展示了语言障碍、权利的不确定性和结构约束如何影响个人如何识别需求、导航服务和体验紧急护理。应对这些挑战需要通过改善沟通、导航支持和对寻求庇护者和难民生活现实的敏感,将公平纳入紧急护理系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书