Validation of the English Proficiency Questionnaire in professional hockey players.

IF 2.1
Ruben J Echemendia, Kaitlin E Riegler, Kimberly G Harmon, Willem Meeuwisse, Michael G Hutchison, J Scott Delaney, Paul Comper, Jared M Bruce
{"title":"Validation of the English Proficiency Questionnaire in professional hockey players.","authors":"Ruben J Echemendia, Kaitlin E Riegler, Kimberly G Harmon, Willem Meeuwisse, Michael G Hutchison, J Scott Delaney, Paul Comper, Jared M Bruce","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acag068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop the English Proficiency Questionnaire (EPQ), a brief, easily deployable measure of English language proficiency and conduct a preliminary validation study of the EPQ in a linguistically and culturally diverse sample of National Hockey Leage players.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diverse sample of 191 players representing nine different nationalities completed (in English) the EPQ and a battery of traditional (\"Paper-and-Pencil\", PnP) neuropsychological tests, including the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF), during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 pre-seasons as part of a larger re-norming project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Principal components analysis revealed one factor that explained 71.37% of the observed variance and generated strong internal consistency (alpha coefficient = 0.86). Statistically significant relationships with medium effect sizes emerged between EPQ Total ratings and TOPF performance (r = 0.33, p < .001) and age when athlete first learned English (r = -0.33, p < .001), but not for age when the athlete moved to an English-speaking country (ρ = -0.09, p > .05). EPQ Total Ratings were significantly correlated with eight of 10 neuropsychological test indices except for Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Total and BVMT-R Delay. Regression models accounted for 4.4%-24.0% of the variance in PnP test performance. The TOPF accounted for unique variance in 8/10 PnP measures, and EPQ variables in 7/10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Beyond normative data, the EPQ can assist clinicians assessing patients who speak English as a non-preferred language. Findings support the use of the EPQ with different primary language groups, which in combination with robust group-specific normative data, may guide clinicians to a more culturally responsive understanding of the patient's cognitive functioning prior to and following sports-related concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acag068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop the English Proficiency Questionnaire (EPQ), a brief, easily deployable measure of English language proficiency and conduct a preliminary validation study of the EPQ in a linguistically and culturally diverse sample of National Hockey Leage players.

Methods: A diverse sample of 191 players representing nine different nationalities completed (in English) the EPQ and a battery of traditional ("Paper-and-Pencil", PnP) neuropsychological tests, including the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF), during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 pre-seasons as part of a larger re-norming project.

Results: Principal components analysis revealed one factor that explained 71.37% of the observed variance and generated strong internal consistency (alpha coefficient = 0.86). Statistically significant relationships with medium effect sizes emerged between EPQ Total ratings and TOPF performance (r = 0.33, p < .001) and age when athlete first learned English (r = -0.33, p < .001), but not for age when the athlete moved to an English-speaking country (ρ = -0.09, p > .05). EPQ Total Ratings were significantly correlated with eight of 10 neuropsychological test indices except for Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Total and BVMT-R Delay. Regression models accounted for 4.4%-24.0% of the variance in PnP test performance. The TOPF accounted for unique variance in 8/10 PnP measures, and EPQ variables in 7/10.

Conclusion: Beyond normative data, the EPQ can assist clinicians assessing patients who speak English as a non-preferred language. Findings support the use of the EPQ with different primary language groups, which in combination with robust group-specific normative data, may guide clinicians to a more culturally responsive understanding of the patient's cognitive functioning prior to and following sports-related concussion.

职业冰球运动员英语水平问卷的验证。
目的:开发英语水平问卷(EPQ),这是一种简单,易于部署的英语语言能力测量方法,并在语言和文化多样化的国家冰球联盟球员样本中对EPQ进行初步验证研究。方法:作为一个更大的重新规范项目的一部分,在2022-2023和2023-2024赛季前,代表9个不同国家的191名球员完成了EPQ(英语)和一系列传统(“纸笔”,PnP)神经心理测试,包括病前功能测试(TOPF)。结果:主成分分析显示,1个因子解释了71.37%的方差,产生了较强的内部一致性(α系数= 0.86)。EPQ总分评分与TOPF成绩之间存在中等效应量的统计学显著关系(r = 0.33, p .05)。EPQ总分与10项神经心理测试指标中除BVMT-R总分和BVMT-R延迟外,其余8项均显著相关。回归模型占PnP测试性能方差的4.4%-24.0%。TOPF在8/10的PnP测量中占唯一方差,在7/10的EPQ变量中占唯一方差。结论:除了规范性数据外,EPQ可以帮助临床医生评估将英语作为非首选语言的患者。研究结果支持在不同主要语言群体中使用EPQ,结合特定群体的规范数据,可以指导临床医生对患者在运动相关脑震荡之前和之后的认知功能有更多的文化反应性理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书