Validation of the Japanese Version of the Rating of Fatigue Scale.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Kaho Suzuki, Takashi Arai
{"title":"Validation of the Japanese Version of the Rating of Fatigue Scale.","authors":"Kaho Suzuki, Takashi Arai","doi":"10.1186/s40798-026-01108-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue research remains important across a wide range of fields. In Japan, fatigue has become a major social issue, and research using Japanese population data is expected to contribute to both practical interventions and theoretical advances. Although several Japanese scales for assessing fatigue have been developed, brief instruments designed to measure fatigue during ongoing activity are limited. Therefore, this study translated the Rating of Fatigue (ROF) scale into Japanese and examined the validity of the Japanese version (ROF-J).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the original ROF was translated into Japanese and back-translated. The comparability of language and similarity of interpretability between the original ROF and the ROF-J were evaluated. These procedures were conducted between July and October 2024. Second, the face validity and concurrent validity of the ROF-J were examined in a questionnaire survey of 85 university students at Tohoku University, Japan, in October 2024. Third, convergent validity was examined by comparing ROF-J scores before and after physical exercise among 35 university sports team members at Tohoku University, Japan, in November 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the comparison between the original ROF and the ROF-j, the comparability of language and similarity of interpretability were generally within acceptable limits. According to the examination of face validity of the ROF-J, participants generally agreed that the ROF-J measured fatigue, supporting its face validity. In addition, ROF-J scores showed a significant positive correlation with scores on an established Japanese fatigue questionnaire, supporting concurrent validity. The survey for examining convergent validity indicated that ROF-J scores increased significantly after exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that the ROF-J demonstrates adequate validity. The scale provides a brief and practical Japanese instrument for assessing subjective fatigue during ongoing activity and may facilitate both applied fatigue assessment and future fatigue research in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13569809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-026-01108-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fatigue research remains important across a wide range of fields. In Japan, fatigue has become a major social issue, and research using Japanese population data is expected to contribute to both practical interventions and theoretical advances. Although several Japanese scales for assessing fatigue have been developed, brief instruments designed to measure fatigue during ongoing activity are limited. Therefore, this study translated the Rating of Fatigue (ROF) scale into Japanese and examined the validity of the Japanese version (ROF-J).

Methods: First, the original ROF was translated into Japanese and back-translated. The comparability of language and similarity of interpretability between the original ROF and the ROF-J were evaluated. These procedures were conducted between July and October 2024. Second, the face validity and concurrent validity of the ROF-J were examined in a questionnaire survey of 85 university students at Tohoku University, Japan, in October 2024. Third, convergent validity was examined by comparing ROF-J scores before and after physical exercise among 35 university sports team members at Tohoku University, Japan, in November 2024.

Results: As a result of the comparison between the original ROF and the ROF-j, the comparability of language and similarity of interpretability were generally within acceptable limits. According to the examination of face validity of the ROF-J, participants generally agreed that the ROF-J measured fatigue, supporting its face validity. In addition, ROF-J scores showed a significant positive correlation with scores on an established Japanese fatigue questionnaire, supporting concurrent validity. The survey for examining convergent validity indicated that ROF-J scores increased significantly after exercise.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that the ROF-J demonstrates adequate validity. The scale provides a brief and practical Japanese instrument for assessing subjective fatigue during ongoing activity and may facilitate both applied fatigue assessment and future fatigue research in Japan.

日文版疲劳量表评定方法的验证。
背景:疲劳研究在很多领域都很重要。在日本,疲劳已成为一个主要的社会问题,利用日本人口数据进行的研究有望为实际干预和理论进步做出贡献。虽然日本已经开发了几种评估疲劳程度的量表,但用于测量正在进行的活动中的疲劳程度的简短仪器有限。因此,本研究将疲劳评定量表(ROF)翻译成日文,并检验日文ROF- j量表的效度。方法:首先将原ROF翻译成日文,并进行反译。评价了原ROF和原ROF- j在语言上的可比性和可解释性上的相似性。这些程序在2024年7月至10月期间进行。其次,采用2024年10月对日本东北大学85名大学生进行问卷调查,对ROF-J的面子效度和并发效度进行检验。第三,通过比较2024年11月日本东北大学35名大学生运动队队员体育锻炼前后ROF-J得分,检验收敛效度。结果:通过对原ROF和ROF-j的比较,语言的可比性和可解释性的相似性基本在可接受的范围内。通过对ROF-J的人脸效度检验,被试普遍认为ROF-J测量的是疲劳程度,支持了ROF-J的人脸效度。此外,ROF-J得分与日本疲劳问卷得分呈显著正相关,支持并发效度。检验收敛效度的调查显示,运动后ROF-J得分显著提高。结论:这些结果表明ROF-J具有足够的有效性。该量表为正在进行的活动中主观疲劳的评估提供了一种简单实用的日本工具,可以促进日本的应用疲劳评估和未来的疲劳研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书