Vision Care Pathway Measures and Vision Outcomes in US Children With Mental, Emotional, Developmental, or Behavioral Problems: National Survey of Children's Health 2019-2023.

Q4 Medicine
Juan M Riestra, Sedra T Alabed, Diana B Riestra, Mustafa Jaffry, Suqin Guo, Prashanth Iyer, Bernard C Szirth, Albert S Khouri, Najeeb U Hussain
{"title":"Vision Care Pathway Measures and Vision Outcomes in US Children With Mental, Emotional, Developmental, or Behavioral Problems: National Survey of Children's Health 2019-2023.","authors":"Juan M Riestra, Sedra T Alabed, Diana B Riestra, Mustafa Jaffry, Suqin Guo, Prashanth Iyer, Bernard C Szirth, Albert S Khouri, Najeeb U Hussain","doi":"10.4088/PCC.26m04278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Children with mental, emotional, developmental, or behavioral (MEDB) problems may face higher risk of vision concerns and more complicated care pathways. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether vision care utilization, screening/referral steps, and vision-related outcomes differ by MEDB status in US children.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) Interactive Data Query outputs for children aged 3-17 years from 2019-2023. MEDB status was defined by the NSCH composite indicator (≥1 qualifying condition and/or meeting emotional/behavioral/developmental criteria). We extracted survey-weighted prevalence estimates (95% CIs) for eye doctor exam/visit, non-eye-doctor screening, postscreening recommendations, diagnosis of a nonrefractive vision disorder, unmet vision care need, and functional vision limitation despite correction. Between-group differences were tested using 2-sided comparisons of weighted proportions.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In 2023, children with MEDB issues had higher rates of having seen an eye doctor, non-eye doctor vision screening, and recommendations for eye exams (<i>P</i><.001). Diagnosis of a nonrefractive vision disorder was also higher in the MEDB group (<i>P</i>=.005). Unmet vision care need did not differ by MEDB status (<i>P</i>=.599). Functional vision limitation despite correction was numerically higher among children with MEDB in most years but not significant in 2023 (<i>P</i>=.274).</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> US children with MEDB problems report more screening, referrals, and eye doctor contact and higher rates of nonrefractive vision disorder diagnosis compared with peers without MEDB. Differences in unmet need were minimal, suggesting that follow-up and care coordination after screening/referral may be targets for improving vision-related outcomes.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord</i> <i>2026;28(5):26m04278</i>.</p><p><p>\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":22814,"journal":{"name":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.26m04278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children with mental, emotional, developmental, or behavioral (MEDB) problems may face higher risk of vision concerns and more complicated care pathways. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether vision care utilization, screening/referral steps, and vision-related outcomes differ by MEDB status in US children.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) Interactive Data Query outputs for children aged 3-17 years from 2019-2023. MEDB status was defined by the NSCH composite indicator (≥1 qualifying condition and/or meeting emotional/behavioral/developmental criteria). We extracted survey-weighted prevalence estimates (95% CIs) for eye doctor exam/visit, non-eye-doctor screening, postscreening recommendations, diagnosis of a nonrefractive vision disorder, unmet vision care need, and functional vision limitation despite correction. Between-group differences were tested using 2-sided comparisons of weighted proportions.

Results: In 2023, children with MEDB issues had higher rates of having seen an eye doctor, non-eye doctor vision screening, and recommendations for eye exams (P<.001). Diagnosis of a nonrefractive vision disorder was also higher in the MEDB group (P=.005). Unmet vision care need did not differ by MEDB status (P=.599). Functional vision limitation despite correction was numerically higher among children with MEDB in most years but not significant in 2023 (P=.274).

Conclusion: US children with MEDB problems report more screening, referrals, and eye doctor contact and higher rates of nonrefractive vision disorder diagnosis compared with peers without MEDB. Differences in unmet need were minimal, suggesting that follow-up and care coordination after screening/referral may be targets for improving vision-related outcomes.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2026;28(5):26m04278.

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

美国有精神、情感、发育或行为问题儿童的视力保健途径措施和视力结果:2019-2023年全国儿童健康调查
目的:患有精神、情感、发育或行为(MEDB)问题的儿童可能面临更高的视力问题风险和更复杂的护理途径。本研究的目的是评估视力保健的利用、筛查/转诊步骤和视力相关结果是否因美国儿童的MEDB状态而异。方法:利用2019-2023年全国儿童健康调查(NSCH)交互式数据查询输出数据进行横断面分析。MEDB状态由NSCH综合指标(≥1个合格条件和/或满足情绪/行为/发育标准)定义。我们提取了调查加权患病率估计(95% ci),包括眼科医生检查/就诊、非眼科医生筛查、筛查后建议、非屈光性视力障碍诊断、未满足的视力保健需求和矫正后的功能性视力限制。采用加权比例的双侧比较检验组间差异。结果:2023年,有MEDB问题的儿童看眼科医生、非眼科医生视力筛查和建议眼科检查的比例更高(PP= 0.005)。未满足的视力保健需求与MEDB状态没有差异(P=.599)。在大多数年份,MEDB患儿的矫正后功能性视力限制在数字上较高,但在2023年无统计学意义(P= 0.274)。结论:与没有MEDB的同龄人相比,有MEDB问题的美国儿童报告了更多的筛查、转诊和眼科医生接触,非屈光性视力障碍诊断率更高。未满足需求的差异很小,这表明筛查/转诊后的随访和护理协调可能是改善视力相关结果的目标。Prim Care Companion CNS disorders; 2009;28(5):26m04278。本文末尾列出了作者所属单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Founded in 1998, The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders (ISSN 2155-7780), formerly The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, is an international, peer-reviewed, online-only journal, and its articles are indexed by the National Library of Medicine. PCC seeks to advance the clinical expertise of primary care physicians and other health care professionals who treat patients with mental and neurologic illnesses. PCC publishes research from disciplines such as medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology, especially as it pertains to integrated delivery systems and interdisciplinary collaboration. PCC focuses on providing information of direct clinical utility and giving a voice to clinician researchers. Practice-based research from individuals and groups with clinical expertise is particularly welcome. Pertinent manuscript types include: -Original research -Systematic reviews -Meta-analyses -Case reports and series -Commenting letters to the editor Articles published in PCC typically cover attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, addiction, sleep disorders, pain, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书