{"title":"Rewiring Cellular Context as A Central Mechanism Governing Cancer Stem Cell Survival: Insights from ESC Comparisons.","authors":"Yasin Ahmadi, Babak Elyasi Far, Sakhavat Abolhasani","doi":"10.1007/s12015-026-11217-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive tumor initiation, metastasis, and therapy resistance, yet their remarkable persistence remains poorly understood. While CSCs share stemness attributes with embryonic stem cells (ESCs), including self-renewal, transcriptional plasticity, and permissive chromatin, they exhibit a fundamentally divergent regulatory logic that prioritizes survival over developmental fidelity. ESCs maintain globally open chromatin that supports transcriptional hyperactivity but predisposes them to apoptosis under genotoxic stress, whereas CSCs maintain dynamically inducible, permissive chromatin at survival loci while repressing differentiation programs, enabling adaptive stress responses. We advance the hypothesis that CSC persistence emerges not from any single factor, but from the integrative rewiring of signaling cascades (Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT/mTOR), stress-responsive transcription factors (HIFs, NF-κB, STAT3), and core pluripotency networks (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG) within a survival-centric context, reinforced by dynamic chromatin remodeling, inducible super-enhancer landscapes, and microenvironmental cues (hypoxia, inflammation, matrix stiffness). Within this framework, the E2F family serves as a key contextual integrator: in ESCs, constitutive E2F activity triggers p53-mediated apoptosis upon DNA damage, preserving genomic integrity; in CSCs, deregulated E2F activity redirects transcription toward DNA repair, antioxidant defenses, and anti-apoptotic programs. This functional divergence underscores that phenotypic outcome is determined by the broader cellular and epigenetic landscape rather than any single factor. We conclude that CSC persistence is an emergent property of this integrated, survival-centric program, fundamentally distinct from the developmental imperative of ESCs. Effective therapeutic strategies must therefore move beyond targeting individual pathways to dismantle the interconnected regulatory networks that define the CSC survival context, offering a more robust approach to overcome therapy resistance and prevent tumor relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":21955,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reviews and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-026-11217-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive tumor initiation, metastasis, and therapy resistance, yet their remarkable persistence remains poorly understood. While CSCs share stemness attributes with embryonic stem cells (ESCs), including self-renewal, transcriptional plasticity, and permissive chromatin, they exhibit a fundamentally divergent regulatory logic that prioritizes survival over developmental fidelity. ESCs maintain globally open chromatin that supports transcriptional hyperactivity but predisposes them to apoptosis under genotoxic stress, whereas CSCs maintain dynamically inducible, permissive chromatin at survival loci while repressing differentiation programs, enabling adaptive stress responses. We advance the hypothesis that CSC persistence emerges not from any single factor, but from the integrative rewiring of signaling cascades (Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, Hedgehog, PI3K/AKT/mTOR), stress-responsive transcription factors (HIFs, NF-κB, STAT3), and core pluripotency networks (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG) within a survival-centric context, reinforced by dynamic chromatin remodeling, inducible super-enhancer landscapes, and microenvironmental cues (hypoxia, inflammation, matrix stiffness). Within this framework, the E2F family serves as a key contextual integrator: in ESCs, constitutive E2F activity triggers p53-mediated apoptosis upon DNA damage, preserving genomic integrity; in CSCs, deregulated E2F activity redirects transcription toward DNA repair, antioxidant defenses, and anti-apoptotic programs. This functional divergence underscores that phenotypic outcome is determined by the broader cellular and epigenetic landscape rather than any single factor. We conclude that CSC persistence is an emergent property of this integrated, survival-centric program, fundamentally distinct from the developmental imperative of ESCs. Effective therapeutic strategies must therefore move beyond targeting individual pathways to dismantle the interconnected regulatory networks that define the CSC survival context, offering a more robust approach to overcome therapy resistance and prevent tumor relapse.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Stem Cell Reviews and Reports is to cover contemporary and emerging areas in stem cell research and regenerative medicine. The journal will consider for publication:
i) solicited or unsolicited reviews of topical areas of stem cell biology that highlight, critique and synthesize recent important findings in the field.
ii) full length and short reports presenting original experimental work.
iii) translational stem cell studies describing results of clinical trials using stem cells as therapeutics.
iv) papers focused on diseases of stem cells.
v) hypothesis and commentary articles as opinion-based pieces in which authors can propose a new theory, interpretation of a controversial area in stem cell biology, or a stem cell biology question or paradigm. These articles contain more speculation than reviews, but they should be based on solid rationale.
vi) protocols as peer-reviewed procedures that provide step-by-step descriptions, outlined in sufficient detail, so that both experts and novices can apply them to their own research.
vii) letters to the editor and correspondence.
In order to facilitate this exchange of scientific information and exciting novel ideas, the journal has created five thematic sections, focusing on:
i) the role of adult stem cells in tissue regeneration;
ii) progress in research on induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and mechanism governing embryogenesis and tissue development;
iii) the role of microenvironment and extracellular microvesicles in directing the fate of stem cells;
iv) mechanisms of stem cell trafficking, stem cell mobilization and homing with special emphasis on hematopoiesis;
v) the role of stem cells in aging processes and cancerogenesis.