Malcolm Su, Samar Bhat, Michael D Dang, Deborah Freeland, Benjamin Johnson, Jessica I Billig, Navid Sadeghi, Arthur S Hong
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health Coding Among Hospital Visits Made by Adults With Cancer.","authors":"Malcolm Su, Samar Bhat, Michael D Dang, Deborah Freeland, Benjamin Johnson, Jessica I Billig, Navid Sadeghi, Arthur S Hong","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-01288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect clinical outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes starting with Z prefix, or Z-codes, were introduced to capture SDOH complexity. We examined Z-code uptake for patients treated by an academic medical center and county safety-net health system and their comprehensive hospital visits from a regional health information exchange.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified adults age 18 years or older from two tumor registries, diagnosed from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023, and identifiably linked them to their longitudinal, comprehensive hospital visits. We characterized Z-code uptake trends as patients visited over 80 hospitals, for all payers including the uninsured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 57,598 patients with 181,684 associated ED and inpatient hospital discharges across more than 80 regional hospitals. Approximately 4.7% of patients had at least one Z-code entered during any hospital visit, and Z-codes were present in just 2.8% of all hospital discharges. Z-code use rose over time from 1.1% of visits in 2016 to 11.3% by 2023. Of the cohort, 23.9% were treated by the county safety-net system; 9.4% had Medicaid and 28.6% were uninsured/charity care at diagnosis; and 24.4% had advanced-stage disease. The most common Z-code was Z59 (housing and economic circumstances), accounting for 48.6% of all Z-codes. Documentation was nearly three-fold higher at the county safety-net system than at the academic center (8.6% <i>v</i> 2.9%; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a population-based sample of adults with cancer and their comprehensive hospital visits, Z-code use increased to over 11% of hospital visits by 2023, and housing and economic problems were most prominent. Future work should explore the validity of this coding at an individual patient level.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2501288"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-01288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect clinical outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes starting with Z prefix, or Z-codes, were introduced to capture SDOH complexity. We examined Z-code uptake for patients treated by an academic medical center and county safety-net health system and their comprehensive hospital visits from a regional health information exchange.
Methods: We identified adults age 18 years or older from two tumor registries, diagnosed from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023, and identifiably linked them to their longitudinal, comprehensive hospital visits. We characterized Z-code uptake trends as patients visited over 80 hospitals, for all payers including the uninsured.
Results: We identified 57,598 patients with 181,684 associated ED and inpatient hospital discharges across more than 80 regional hospitals. Approximately 4.7% of patients had at least one Z-code entered during any hospital visit, and Z-codes were present in just 2.8% of all hospital discharges. Z-code use rose over time from 1.1% of visits in 2016 to 11.3% by 2023. Of the cohort, 23.9% were treated by the county safety-net system; 9.4% had Medicaid and 28.6% were uninsured/charity care at diagnosis; and 24.4% had advanced-stage disease. The most common Z-code was Z59 (housing and economic circumstances), accounting for 48.6% of all Z-codes. Documentation was nearly three-fold higher at the county safety-net system than at the academic center (8.6% v 2.9%; P < .001).
Conclusion: In a population-based sample of adults with cancer and their comprehensive hospital visits, Z-code use increased to over 11% of hospital visits by 2023, and housing and economic problems were most prominent. Future work should explore the validity of this coding at an individual patient level.
目的:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)影响癌症患者的临床结果。2015年,引入了以Z前缀开头的国际疾病分类-10诊断代码,以捕获SDOH复杂性。我们检查了接受学术医疗中心和县安全网卫生系统治疗的患者的z码摄取情况,以及他们从区域卫生信息交换中进行的综合医院就诊情况。方法:我们从两个肿瘤登记处中选取年龄在18岁或以上的成年人,诊断时间为2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日,并将其与他们的纵向综合医院就诊联系起来。我们描述了患者访问80多家医院时的z码吸收趋势,包括未投保的所有付款人。结果:我们在80多家地区医院确定了57,598例患者,其中有181,684例相关ED和住院患者出院。大约4.7%的患者在任何医院就诊期间至少输入了一个z码,而z码仅出现在所有出院患者的2.8%中。z码的使用率从2016年的1.1%上升到2023年的11.3%。23.9%的人享受县社会保障制度;9.4%的人有医疗补助,28.6%的人在诊断时没有保险/慈善护理;24.4%为晚期疾病。最常见的z码是Z59(住房和经济环境),占所有z码的48.6%。县安全网系统的文件记录几乎是学术中心的三倍(8.6% vs 2.9%; P < .001)。结论:在以人群为基础的成年癌症患者及其综合医院就诊样本中,到2023年,z码的使用率将增加到11%以上,住房和经济问题最为突出。未来的工作应该探索这种编码在个体患者水平上的有效性。