Biometry-driven selection of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using the ESCRS IOL calculator.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Youngsub Eom, Miri Na, Jinhwan Park, Youngbin Song, Dong Hyun Kim, Cheolmin Yun, Jong Suk Song, David L Cooke, Kyungmin Koh
{"title":"Biometry-driven selection of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using the ESCRS IOL calculator.","authors":"Youngsub Eom, Miri Na, Jinhwan Park, Youngbin Song, Dong Hyun Kim, Cheolmin Yun, Jong Suk Song, David L Cooke, Kyungmin Koh","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of a biometric subgroup-based intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula selection strategy using the ESCRS IOL Calculator.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kim's Eye Hospital and Korea University Ansan Hospital, South Korea.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>626 eyes that underwent uneventful cataract surgery with in-the-bag IOL implantation were included. Eyes were divided into a derivation dataset (351 eyes) and an independent external-validation dataset (275 eyes). Biometric subgroups were defined based on combinations of keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL), resulting in 640 subgroups. For each subgroup, the formula with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) was selected using the derivation dataset. For subgroups not represented in the derivation dataset, formulas were assigned using a median-based approach. Prediction accuracy in the validation dataset was compared between the subgroup-based method and 7 individual formulas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subgroup-based method demonstrated the lowest MAE (0.24 ± 0.19 diopters [D]) and median absolute error (0.19 D) among all methods ( P < .001). The proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D was higher with the subgroup-based method (89.1%) compared with individual formulas (approximately 80%; P < .001). The subgroup-based method also showed the highest IOL Formula Performance Index (0.609) compared with individual formulas (0.377 to 0.560).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selecting IOL power calculation formulas according to biometric subgroups defined by K, ACD, and AL improves refractive prediction accuracy compared with individual formulas. A biometry-driven formula selection strategy using the ESCRS IOL Calculator may provide a clinically useful approach for optimizing refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of a biometric subgroup-based intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula selection strategy using the ESCRS IOL Calculator.

Setting: Kim's Eye Hospital and Korea University Ansan Hospital, South Korea.

Design: Retrospective comparative study.

Methods: 626 eyes that underwent uneventful cataract surgery with in-the-bag IOL implantation were included. Eyes were divided into a derivation dataset (351 eyes) and an independent external-validation dataset (275 eyes). Biometric subgroups were defined based on combinations of keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL), resulting in 640 subgroups. For each subgroup, the formula with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) was selected using the derivation dataset. For subgroups not represented in the derivation dataset, formulas were assigned using a median-based approach. Prediction accuracy in the validation dataset was compared between the subgroup-based method and 7 individual formulas.

Results: The subgroup-based method demonstrated the lowest MAE (0.24 ± 0.19 diopters [D]) and median absolute error (0.19 D) among all methods ( P < .001). The proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D was higher with the subgroup-based method (89.1%) compared with individual formulas (approximately 80%; P < .001). The subgroup-based method also showed the highest IOL Formula Performance Index (0.609) compared with individual formulas (0.377 to 0.560).

Conclusions: Selecting IOL power calculation formulas according to biometric subgroups defined by K, ACD, and AL improves refractive prediction accuracy compared with individual formulas. A biometry-driven formula selection strategy using the ESCRS IOL Calculator may provide a clinically useful approach for optimizing refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.

使用ESCRS IOL计算器的生物识别驱动的IOL功率计算公式选择。
目的:应用ESCRS人工晶状体计算器评估基于生物特征亚群的人工晶状体度数计算公式选择策略的准确性。地点:韩国金氏眼科医院和高丽大学安山医院。设计:回顾性比较研究。方法:对626眼行无并发症白内障囊内人工晶状体植入术的患者进行分析。眼睛被分为派生数据集(351只)和独立的外部验证数据集(275只)。根据角膜测量(K)、前房深度(ACD)和轴向长度(AL)的组合定义生物特征亚组,共有640个亚组。对于每个子组,使用衍生数据集选择具有最低平均绝对误差(MAE)的公式。对于派生数据集中未表示的子组,使用基于中位数的方法分配公式。比较了基于子组的方法和7个单独公式在验证数据集中的预测精度。结果:基于亚组的人工晶状体屈光度预测方法的MAE(0.24±0.19 D)和MedAE (0.19 D)在所有方法中最低。结论:根据K、ACD和AL定义的生物特征亚组选择人工晶状体度数计算公式,与单个公式相比,可提高屈光度预测的准确性。使用ESCRS IOL计算器的生物识别驱动配方选择策略可能为优化白内障手术后屈光结果提供临床有用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书