Anaf Kololichalil, K Muhammed Jadeer, Ragul Ganesh, Rohit Verma, Vaibhav Patil
{"title":"Neuromodulation therapies in the management of tardive dyskinesia: A scoping review.","authors":"Anaf Kololichalil, K Muhammed Jadeer, Ragul Ganesh, Rohit Verma, Vaibhav Patil","doi":"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_1300_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tardive dyskinesia (TD) comprises persistent involuntary movements that usually emerge after sustained treatment with dopamine receptor blocking agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors have expanded treatment options, a proportion of patients continue to experience disabling symptoms, prompting interest in neuromodulator interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evidence was retrieved from three databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with coverage limited to English-language publications dated January 2000-September 2025. Studies reporting the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for TD were charted, and the extracted findings were grouped according to neuromodulation modality following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included studies comprised DBS, ECT, rTMS, and tDCS reports, with evidence ranging from randomized controlled trials to case reports. Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) showed the most consistent and durable benefit, with prospective studies reporting approximately 56%-63% improvement on extrapyramidal symptom rating scale (ESRS) and abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) outcomes. ECT was associated with AIMS improvement in one small retrospective study and three case-reports. rTMS showed preliminary benefit, although protocols were heterogeneous and TD-specific controlled outcomes were limited. tDCS showed emerging benefit, particularly for facial-oral dyskinesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuromodulation is a promising adjunctive option for refractory TD. GPi-DBS has the strongest evidence, whereas rTMS and tDCS remain investigational and require larger controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13345,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"68 8","pages":"683-691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13561489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_1300_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) comprises persistent involuntary movements that usually emerge after sustained treatment with dopamine receptor blocking agents.
Objectives: Although vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors have expanded treatment options, a proportion of patients continue to experience disabling symptoms, prompting interest in neuromodulator interventions.
Methods: Evidence was retrieved from three databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with coverage limited to English-language publications dated January 2000-September 2025. Studies reporting the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for TD were charted, and the extracted findings were grouped according to neuromodulation modality following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidance.
Results: Included studies comprised DBS, ECT, rTMS, and tDCS reports, with evidence ranging from randomized controlled trials to case reports. Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) showed the most consistent and durable benefit, with prospective studies reporting approximately 56%-63% improvement on extrapyramidal symptom rating scale (ESRS) and abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) outcomes. ECT was associated with AIMS improvement in one small retrospective study and three case-reports. rTMS showed preliminary benefit, although protocols were heterogeneous and TD-specific controlled outcomes were limited. tDCS showed emerging benefit, particularly for facial-oral dyskinesia.
Conclusion: Neuromodulation is a promising adjunctive option for refractory TD. GPi-DBS has the strongest evidence, whereas rTMS and tDCS remain investigational and require larger controlled trials.
背景:迟发性运动障碍(TD)包括持续的不自主运动,通常在持续使用多巴胺受体阻滞剂治疗后出现。目的:尽管水疱单胺转运蛋白2 (VMAT2)抑制剂扩大了治疗选择,但仍有一部分患者出现致残症状,这促使人们对神经调节剂干预的兴趣。方法:从PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science三个数据库中检索证据,覆盖范围限于2000年1月至2025年9月的英文出版物。研究报告使用脑深部电刺激(DBS),电痉挛治疗(ECT),重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),或经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗TD的图表,提取的结果根据神经调节模式分组,遵循系统评价和meta分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南。结果:纳入的研究包括DBS、ECT、rTMS和tDCS报告,证据范围从随机对照试验到病例报告。白球内深部脑刺激(GPi-DBS)显示出最一致和持久的益处,前瞻性研究报告锥体外系症状评定量表(ESRS)和异常不自主运动量表(AIMS)结果改善约56%-63%。在一项小型回顾性研究和三份病例报告中,ECT与AIMS改善有关。rTMS显示了初步的益处,尽管方案是异构的,并且td特异性对照结果有限。tDCS显示出新的益处,特别是对面部-口腔运动障碍。结论:神经调节是治疗难治性TD的一种很有前途的辅助选择。GPi-DBS有最有力的证据,而rTMS和tDCS仍处于研究阶段,需要更大规模的对照试验。
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (ISSN 0019-5545), is an official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society. It is published Bimonthly with one additional supplement (total 5 issues). The IJP publishes original work in all the fields of psychiatry. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication.
The issues are published Bimonthly. An additional supplement is also published annually. Articles can be submitted online from www.journalonweb.com . The journal provides immediate free access to all the published articles. The journal does not charge the authors for submission, processing or publication of the articles.