Simulated encounters reveal gaps in counselling on St John's Wort-oral contraceptive pill interactions among pharmacy personnel.

IF 2.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ting Yee Chan, Wai-Jo Jocelin Chan, Betty Chaar, Joanna E Harnett
{"title":"Simulated encounters reveal gaps in counselling on St John's Wort-oral contraceptive pill interactions among pharmacy personnel.","authors":"Ting Yee Chan, Wai-Jo Jocelin Chan, Betty Chaar, Joanna E Harnett","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riag128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Complementary medicines (CM) are widely used and commonly taken with conventional treatments, raising concerns about possible interactions. The primary objective of this study was to explore whether pharmacists and pharmacy staff are identifying and preventing potential CM-drug interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A simulated-patient study involving visits to 100 pharmacies in Sydney Australia. The simulated-patient requested advice about the safety of a herbal product containing Hypericum perforatum [St John's Wort (SJW)] and the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) using a scripted scenario. A standardized survey checklist was used to document the encounter.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Of the 100 pharmacy visits made, advice was provided by a pharmacist (n = 85, 85%) or pharmacy assistant (n = 15, 15%) across 59 franchise and 41 independent pharmacies. Most pharmacists (n = 68, 80%) were able to identify the interaction between the OCP and SJW and advised not to take them concurrently. Referral to another healthcare professional was made by some pharmacists (n = 25, 29.4%), predominantly to medical practitioners and specialists (n = 25, 92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While most pharmacists and pharmacy staff who were consulted during this study were able to recognize the interaction between the OCP and SJW, overall there was limited history-taking, inconsistent referral practices, and variable quality and completeness of advice. These findings highlight the need for CM-specific counselling guidelines, and pharmacists' training and continuing professional education to support safer integration of CM in pharmacy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riag128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Complementary medicines (CM) are widely used and commonly taken with conventional treatments, raising concerns about possible interactions. The primary objective of this study was to explore whether pharmacists and pharmacy staff are identifying and preventing potential CM-drug interactions.

Methods: A simulated-patient study involving visits to 100 pharmacies in Sydney Australia. The simulated-patient requested advice about the safety of a herbal product containing Hypericum perforatum [St John's Wort (SJW)] and the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) using a scripted scenario. A standardized survey checklist was used to document the encounter.

Key findings: Of the 100 pharmacy visits made, advice was provided by a pharmacist (n = 85, 85%) or pharmacy assistant (n = 15, 15%) across 59 franchise and 41 independent pharmacies. Most pharmacists (n = 68, 80%) were able to identify the interaction between the OCP and SJW and advised not to take them concurrently. Referral to another healthcare professional was made by some pharmacists (n = 25, 29.4%), predominantly to medical practitioners and specialists (n = 25, 92%).

Conclusions: While most pharmacists and pharmacy staff who were consulted during this study were able to recognize the interaction between the OCP and SJW, overall there was limited history-taking, inconsistent referral practices, and variable quality and completeness of advice. These findings highlight the need for CM-specific counselling guidelines, and pharmacists' training and continuing professional education to support safer integration of CM in pharmacy practice.

模拟的遭遇揭示了圣约翰草与口服避孕药之间药房人员相互作用的咨询差距。
目的:补充药物(CM)被广泛使用,通常与常规治疗一起服用,引起了对可能相互作用的关注。本研究的主要目的是探讨药剂师和药房工作人员是否识别和预防潜在的cm -药物相互作用。方法:对澳大利亚悉尼100家药店进行模拟患者研究。模拟患者使用脚本场景询问关于含有贯叶连翘[圣约翰草(SJW)]和口服避孕药(OCP)的草药产品的安全性的建议。一个标准化的调查清单被用来记录这次遭遇。主要发现:在进行的100次药房访问中,59家特许经营药店和41家独立药店的药剂师(n = 85,85%)或药房助理(n = 15,15%)提供了建议。大多数药剂师(n = 68, 80%)能够识别OCP和SJW之间的相互作用,并建议不要同时服用它们。一些药剂师(n = 25, 29.4%)转诊给其他保健专业人员,主要是转诊给医生和专家(n = 25, 92%)。结论:虽然在本研究中接受咨询的大多数药剂师和药房工作人员能够认识到OCP和SJW之间的相互作用,但总体而言,病史记录有限,转诊实践不一致,建议的质量和完整性参差不齐。这些发现强调需要制定针对中药的咨询指南,以及药剂师的培训和持续专业教育,以支持中药在药学实践中的更安全整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书