Right Bundle Branch Block without Anterior ST-Segment Depression: Should It Be Automatically Flagged as Anterior STEMI Equivalent?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-09-11 DOI:10.1159/crd/absag009
Turner Glenn, Murali Palathinkara, Yochai Birnbaum
{"title":"Right Bundle Branch Block without Anterior ST-Segment Depression: Should It Be Automatically Flagged as Anterior STEMI Equivalent?","authors":"Turner Glenn, Murali Palathinkara, Yochai Birnbaum","doi":"10.1159/crd/absag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), the utility of ST-segment abnormalities in assessing for acute myocardial infarction remains a topic of ongoing discussion. We studied whether lack of ST depression in V1-V3 should be added to the computerized algorithms of interpretation as an equivalent of ST elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction due to LAD occlusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 99 patients were selected from a single center based on evaluation of routine electrocardiography (ECG) showing RBBB and an ST-segment which was at or above the isoelectric line in leads V1-V3. A retrospective chart review was then performed to evaluate for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI), as well as need for revascularization via PCI or CABG. Additional data were collected for this population, including symptomatology at the time of ECG, past medical history, and frequency of additional cardiac workup including stress test and catheterization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9 of 99 (9.1%) patients were found to have a diagnosis of acute MI based on cardiac catheterization findings and/or troponin elevation from baseline. Of the 9 patients with acute MI, two were referred for possible CABG with revascularization performed on one. No patients with acute MI underwent emergent PCI. PCI and CABG were subsequently performed for 3 (3%) and 5 (5.1%) of all patients, respectively. Only 1 of these revascularized patients received a diagnosis of acute MI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with RBBB lacking ST depression in the anterior leads, the frequency of emergent revascularization was low. These findings demonstrate that while acute occlusion is a possible etiology for ST-segment at or above the isoelectric line in patients with RBBB, these changes are a poor indicator of occlusion in isolation. ECG should be considered in clinical context when deciding whether or not to activate primary percutaneous coronary intervention protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/crd/absag009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), the utility of ST-segment abnormalities in assessing for acute myocardial infarction remains a topic of ongoing discussion. We studied whether lack of ST depression in V1-V3 should be added to the computerized algorithms of interpretation as an equivalent of ST elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction due to LAD occlusion.

Methods: A total of 99 patients were selected from a single center based on evaluation of routine electrocardiography (ECG) showing RBBB and an ST-segment which was at or above the isoelectric line in leads V1-V3. A retrospective chart review was then performed to evaluate for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI), as well as need for revascularization via PCI or CABG. Additional data were collected for this population, including symptomatology at the time of ECG, past medical history, and frequency of additional cardiac workup including stress test and catheterization.

Results: In total, 9 of 99 (9.1%) patients were found to have a diagnosis of acute MI based on cardiac catheterization findings and/or troponin elevation from baseline. Of the 9 patients with acute MI, two were referred for possible CABG with revascularization performed on one. No patients with acute MI underwent emergent PCI. PCI and CABG were subsequently performed for 3 (3%) and 5 (5.1%) of all patients, respectively. Only 1 of these revascularized patients received a diagnosis of acute MI.

Conclusion: In patients with RBBB lacking ST depression in the anterior leads, the frequency of emergent revascularization was low. These findings demonstrate that while acute occlusion is a possible etiology for ST-segment at or above the isoelectric line in patients with RBBB, these changes are a poor indicator of occlusion in isolation. ECG should be considered in clinical context when deciding whether or not to activate primary percutaneous coronary intervention protocol.

右束支阻滞无前st段凹陷-是否应自动标记为前路STEMI等效?
背景:在右束分支阻滞(RBBB)患者中,st段异常在评估急性心肌梗死中的应用仍然是一个正在进行讨论的话题。我们研究了是否应该在计算机解释算法中增加V1-V3段ST段下降的缺失,作为LAD闭塞导致的急性心肌梗死患者ST段升高的等效因素。方法根据常规心电图显示RBBB、等电或轻度升高(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书