Liquid neural networks for adaptive latent brain-state modeling: A perspective

IF 6.4
Brain-X Pub Date : 2026-08-31 DOI:10.1002/brx2.70053
Yifan Zhang, Jingde Yin, Xiaoyue Ji, Jiansong Ji, Chun Sing Lai, Zhekang Dong
{"title":"Liquid neural networks for adaptive latent brain-state modeling: A perspective","authors":"Yifan Zhang,&nbsp;Jingde Yin,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Ji,&nbsp;Jiansong Ji,&nbsp;Chun Sing Lai,&nbsp;Zhekang Dong","doi":"10.1002/brx2.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding brain function requires models that characterize neural activity as evolving latent brain states rather than as isolated signal segments. Existing artificial intelligence methods have advanced neural decoding, disease classification, functional connectivity analysis, and brain–computer interfaces. However, brain-state prediction, temporal organization, state transitions, dynamical stability, and intervention responses are often studied as separate problems, limiting a unified understanding of how brain states are represented, organized, transformed, disrupted, and regulated. In this perspective, we examine liquid neural networks (LNNs) as a computational framework for adaptive latent brain-state modeling. We do not argue that LNNs are the only approach to continuous-time modeling. Instead, we focus on how their continuous dynamics and input- and state-dependent temporal adaptation can help link latent trajectories, temporal-scale regulation, state stability, and perturbation responses. We position LNNs in relation to spiking neural networks, recurrent neural networks, transformers, neural ordinary differential equations, and state-space models, and discuss their relevance to multimodal neural signal fusion, cortical hierarchical dynamics, brain-state transitions, dynamic disease prediction, and closed-loop neuromodulation. Overall, LNNs show promise for adaptive latent brain-state modeling, but their scientific and translational value depends on rigorous benchmarking, biological validation, computational feasibility, generalization, and real-world safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94303,"journal":{"name":"Brain-X","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brx2.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brx2.70053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding brain function requires models that characterize neural activity as evolving latent brain states rather than as isolated signal segments. Existing artificial intelligence methods have advanced neural decoding, disease classification, functional connectivity analysis, and brain–computer interfaces. However, brain-state prediction, temporal organization, state transitions, dynamical stability, and intervention responses are often studied as separate problems, limiting a unified understanding of how brain states are represented, organized, transformed, disrupted, and regulated. In this perspective, we examine liquid neural networks (LNNs) as a computational framework for adaptive latent brain-state modeling. We do not argue that LNNs are the only approach to continuous-time modeling. Instead, we focus on how their continuous dynamics and input- and state-dependent temporal adaptation can help link latent trajectories, temporal-scale regulation, state stability, and perturbation responses. We position LNNs in relation to spiking neural networks, recurrent neural networks, transformers, neural ordinary differential equations, and state-space models, and discuss their relevance to multimodal neural signal fusion, cortical hierarchical dynamics, brain-state transitions, dynamic disease prediction, and closed-loop neuromodulation. Overall, LNNs show promise for adaptive latent brain-state modeling, but their scientific and translational value depends on rigorous benchmarking, biological validation, computational feasibility, generalization, and real-world safety.

液体神经网络用于自适应潜在脑状态建模:一个视角
理解脑功能需要将神经活动描述为进化的潜在脑状态而不是孤立的信号片段的模型。现有的人工智能方法具有先进的神经解码、疾病分类、功能连接分析和脑机接口。然而,大脑状态预测、时间组织、状态转换、动态稳定性和干预反应往往被作为单独的问题进行研究,限制了对大脑状态如何被表征、组织、转换、破坏和调节的统一理解。从这个角度来看,我们研究了液体神经网络(LNNs)作为自适应潜在脑状态建模的计算框架。我们并不认为LNNs是连续时间建模的唯一方法。相反,我们关注的是它们的连续动力学和输入和状态依赖的时间适应如何帮助连接潜在轨迹、时间尺度调节、状态稳定性和扰动响应。我们将LNNs与峰值神经网络、循环神经网络、变压器、神经常微分方程和状态空间模型联系起来,并讨论它们与多模态神经信号融合、皮层层次动力学、大脑状态转换、动态疾病预测和闭环神经调节的相关性。总体而言,LNNs显示出自适应潜在脑状态建模的前景,但它们的科学和转化价值取决于严格的基准测试、生物学验证、计算可行性、泛化和现实世界的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书