Culinary Resistance Beyond Gastronationalism: Terroir, Smallholder Networks and the Ottoman Roots of Agrarian–Urban Solidarity in Turkey

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Berfin Varışlı
{"title":"Culinary Resistance Beyond Gastronationalism: Terroir, Smallholder Networks and the Ottoman Roots of Agrarian–Urban Solidarity in Turkey","authors":"Berfin Varışlı","doi":"10.1111/glob.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Contemporary scholarship on culinary globalization has theorized homogenization and glocalization through urban consumption, leaving underexamined the transnational agro-ecological networks that make culinary resistance materially possible. Drawing on qualitative interviews with thirty professional chefs in Istanbul, this study develops a generalizable framework for culinary resistance in post-imperial societies, extending to contexts where imperial heritage, agrarian networks and global food regimes intersect. Culinary actors resist McDonaldization not only through gastronationalist reflexes, but through alternative food networks bypassing agro-industrial supply chains for direct smallholder procurement. Three theoretical contributions are advanced: first, hybridity is the foundational condition of culinary culture in post-imperial societies, rendering the homogenization–heterogenization binary insufficient; second, DeSoucey's gastronationalism is provincialized beyond its EU context, showing resistance operates through informal networks and agrarian–urban solidarities without regulatory scaffolding; third, the agrarian–urban solidarity matrix reframes the supply chain – rather than the kitchen – as the primary site of culinary resistance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47882,"journal":{"name":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.70076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary scholarship on culinary globalization has theorized homogenization and glocalization through urban consumption, leaving underexamined the transnational agro-ecological networks that make culinary resistance materially possible. Drawing on qualitative interviews with thirty professional chefs in Istanbul, this study develops a generalizable framework for culinary resistance in post-imperial societies, extending to contexts where imperial heritage, agrarian networks and global food regimes intersect. Culinary actors resist McDonaldization not only through gastronationalist reflexes, but through alternative food networks bypassing agro-industrial supply chains for direct smallholder procurement. Three theoretical contributions are advanced: first, hybridity is the foundational condition of culinary culture in post-imperial societies, rendering the homogenization–heterogenization binary insufficient; second, DeSoucey's gastronationalism is provincialized beyond its EU context, showing resistance operates through informal networks and agrarian–urban solidarities without regulatory scaffolding; third, the agrarian–urban solidarity matrix reframes the supply chain – rather than the kitchen – as the primary site of culinary resistance.

超越美食民族主义的烹饪抵抗:土耳其的风土,小农网络和农业-城市团结的奥斯曼根源
当代关于烹饪全球化的学术研究已经通过城市消费将同质化和全球本地化理论化,而没有充分研究跨国农业生态网络,这些网络使烹饪抵抗在物质上成为可能。通过对伊斯坦布尔30位专业厨师的定性访谈,本研究开发了一个后帝国社会烹饪抵抗的通用框架,扩展到帝国遗产、农业网络和全球食物制度交叉的背景下。烹饪行为者抵制麦当劳化,不仅是通过美食民族主义的反应,而且是通过绕过农业工业供应链的替代食品网络,让小农直接采购。提出了三个理论贡献:第一,杂交性是后帝国社会烹饪文化的基础条件,使得同质化-异质化二元理论不足;其次,DeSoucey的美食民族主义超越了其欧盟背景,显示出阻力通过非正式网络和没有监管框架的农业-城市团结运作;第三,农业-城市团结矩阵将供应链(而不是厨房)重新定义为烹饪抵抗的主要场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书