Exploring Religious Identities in 2020s China: Prevalence and Boundaries

IF 2.3 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Pub Date : 2026-09-11 Epub Date: 2026-03-28 DOI:10.1111/jssr.70044
Xiaozhao Yousef Yang, Nan Wu, Kaiwen Guo
{"title":"Exploring Religious Identities in 2020s China: Prevalence and Boundaries","authors":"Xiaozhao Yousef Yang,&nbsp;Nan Wu,&nbsp;Kaiwen Guo","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explores religious identities in China by drawing representative samples in 2024 from two ideal-typical regions, Manchuria and Guangdong. The results show that the majority (over 50%) chose “neither atheist nor religious believer,” but only 13% solely identified as atheists. At least one-third of the population identified with a religion, with Buddhism being the largest religious identity and a considerable proportion having syncretic identifications. There was a significantly higher prevalence of Christianity in Manchuria (4.5% or 11.4% depending on criteria) and a significantly higher prevalence of folk religion in Guangdong (4.7% or 7.8%). Tetrachoric correlations reveal tighter religious boundaries in Guangdong and more porous boundaries in Manchuria. In Guangdong, some religious identities were significantly associated with ethnocultural identities, whereas few such religious-ethnocultural associations exist in Manchuria. We also found an associative block among Christianity, Islam, Confucianism, and Daoism in both places, wherein individuals identifying with one of these religions were likely to have families from all four religions. In terms of identification, there is no evidence for Eastern religions being more syncretic than Christianity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"505-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.70044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores religious identities in China by drawing representative samples in 2024 from two ideal-typical regions, Manchuria and Guangdong. The results show that the majority (over 50%) chose “neither atheist nor religious believer,” but only 13% solely identified as atheists. At least one-third of the population identified with a religion, with Buddhism being the largest religious identity and a considerable proportion having syncretic identifications. There was a significantly higher prevalence of Christianity in Manchuria (4.5% or 11.4% depending on criteria) and a significantly higher prevalence of folk religion in Guangdong (4.7% or 7.8%). Tetrachoric correlations reveal tighter religious boundaries in Guangdong and more porous boundaries in Manchuria. In Guangdong, some religious identities were significantly associated with ethnocultural identities, whereas few such religious-ethnocultural associations exist in Manchuria. We also found an associative block among Christianity, Islam, Confucianism, and Daoism in both places, wherein individuals identifying with one of these religions were likely to have families from all four religions. In terms of identification, there is no evidence for Eastern religions being more syncretic than Christianity.

20世纪20年代中国宗教认同探析:流行与边界
本研究通过选取2024年中国东北和广东两个理想典型地区的代表性样本,探讨了中国的宗教认同问题。结果显示,大多数人(超过50%)选择“既不是无神论者也不是宗教信徒”,但只有13%的人认为自己是无神论者。至少有三分之一的人口认同某种宗教,其中佛教是最大的宗教认同,还有相当大比例的人认同多种宗教。基督教在满洲的流行率明显较高(4.5%或11.4%取决于标准),民间宗教在广东的流行率明显较高(4.7%或7.8%)。四分频相关性表明,广东的宗教界限较为紧密,而满洲的宗教界限较为松散。在广东,一些宗教认同与民族文化认同显著相关,而在满洲,这种宗教-民族文化联系很少。我们还在这两个地方发现了基督教、伊斯兰教、儒教和道教之间的关联块,其中认同其中一种宗教的个人可能有来自这四种宗教的家庭。就认同而言,没有证据表明东方宗教比基督教更具融合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews on the social scientific study of religion. Published articles are representative of the best current theoretical and methodological treatments of religion. Substantive areas include both micro-level analysis of religious organizations, institutions, and social change. While many articles published in the journal are sociological, the journal also publishes the work of psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and economists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书