Establishing expert consensus on the development and implementation of a Whole School Approach to supporting primary school children with dyslexia: A Delphi study

IF 1.2 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
British Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2026-09-11 Epub Date: 2026-06-13 DOI:10.1111/1467-8578.70111
Matthew Cavanagh, Claire McDowell, Una O'Connor Bones, Laurence Taggart, Peter Mulhall
{"title":"Establishing expert consensus on the development and implementation of a Whole School Approach to supporting primary school children with dyslexia: A Delphi study","authors":"Matthew Cavanagh,&nbsp;Claire McDowell,&nbsp;Una O'Connor Bones,&nbsp;Laurence Taggart,&nbsp;Peter Mulhall","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dyslexia affects an estimated 7%–10% of children and can have a profound and lasting impact on literacy, academic attainment and wellbeing. In Northern Ireland, provision for children with dyslexia remains inconsistent, characterised by variation in identification procedures, delays in assessment and uneven support across schools. A Whole School Approach (WSA) offers a strategic and sustainable model for embedding dyslexia-inclusive practice across all aspects of school life. This study aimed to achieve expert consensus on the essential components of a WSA to support primary school children with dyslexia. A modified two-round Delphi design was employed with 40 international experts, including educational psychologists, SENCos, specialist teachers, researchers and policymakers. Round 1 comprised 60 items across seven domains (development, components, leadership, parental involvement, training, progress assessment and barriers). Round 2 refined 11 items based on feedback. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and interquartile ranges, while qualitative feedback was analysed thematically. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. Results indicated strong cross-professional agreement across all domains, particularly development, training and inclusion. Divergence was observed in opinions regarding online professional development and the involvement of external facilitators. The findings provide a robust, expert-informed foundation for developing a consensus-informed Whole School Approach Logic Model intended to guide coherent dyslexia-inclusive practice within primary education.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"53 3","pages":"414-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.70111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyslexia affects an estimated 7%–10% of children and can have a profound and lasting impact on literacy, academic attainment and wellbeing. In Northern Ireland, provision for children with dyslexia remains inconsistent, characterised by variation in identification procedures, delays in assessment and uneven support across schools. A Whole School Approach (WSA) offers a strategic and sustainable model for embedding dyslexia-inclusive practice across all aspects of school life. This study aimed to achieve expert consensus on the essential components of a WSA to support primary school children with dyslexia. A modified two-round Delphi design was employed with 40 international experts, including educational psychologists, SENCos, specialist teachers, researchers and policymakers. Round 1 comprised 60 items across seven domains (development, components, leadership, parental involvement, training, progress assessment and barriers). Round 2 refined 11 items based on feedback. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and interquartile ranges, while qualitative feedback was analysed thematically. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. Results indicated strong cross-professional agreement across all domains, particularly development, training and inclusion. Divergence was observed in opinions regarding online professional development and the involvement of external facilitators. The findings provide a robust, expert-informed foundation for developing a consensus-informed Whole School Approach Logic Model intended to guide coherent dyslexia-inclusive practice within primary education.

建立专家共识的发展和实施全校方法支持小学生阅读障碍:德尔菲研究
据估计,7%-10%的儿童患有阅读障碍,并可能对读写能力、学业成绩和幸福感产生深远而持久的影响。在北爱尔兰,为患有阅读障碍的儿童提供的服务仍然不一致,其特点是识别程序的差异、评估的延迟和学校间支持的不平衡。整个学校方法(WSA)提供了一个战略性和可持续的模式,将阅读障碍包容性实践融入学校生活的各个方面。本研究旨在达成专家对WSA的基本组成部分的共识,以支持患有阅读障碍的小学生。采用改进的两轮德尔菲设计,40名国际专家,包括教育心理学家,SENCos,专业教师,研究人员和政策制定者。第一轮包括7个领域的60个项目(发展、组成、领导力、父母参与、培训、进度评估和障碍)。第二轮基于反馈完善了11个项目。定量数据采用描述性统计和四分位数范围进行分析,而定性反馈采用主题分析。共识定义为≥70%的同意。结果表明,在所有领域,特别是发展、培训和包容方面,都有很强的跨专业共识。对网络专业发展和外部辅导员参与的意见存在分歧。该研究结果为建立一个基于共识的全校方法逻辑模型提供了坚实的、专家知情的基础,该模型旨在指导小学教育中连贯的阅读障碍包容性实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书