The Drivers of Donations: Personal Morality or Just a Bandwagon Effect?

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Sigitas Urbonavicius, Mindaugas Degutis, Agne Simanaviciute, Karina Adomaviciute-Sakalauske, Vatroslav Skare
{"title":"The Drivers of Donations: Personal Morality or Just a Bandwagon Effect?","authors":"Sigitas Urbonavicius,&nbsp;Mindaugas Degutis,&nbsp;Agne Simanaviciute,&nbsp;Karina Adomaviciute-Sakalauske,&nbsp;Vatroslav Skare","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite extensive research on charitable giving, studies tend to focus either on internal moral motivations or on external social influence, with limited integration of these two perspectives and little attention given to their joint impacts in digital philanthropic contexts. Addressing this gap, this study examines how donation intentions are driven by both moral identity and bandwagon effects and investigates the mediating role of engagement with the charitable cause on social media. Drawing on Social Identity Theory, we conceptualise moral identity as an intrinsic driver of prosocial behaviour, while the bandwagon effect reflects conformity to others' actions. Using survey data from 976 respondents in Lithuania and performing PLS-SEM analysis, this study tests both the direct and indirect effects of these factors on donation intentions in a crowdfunding context. The results show that both moral identity and the bandwagon effect positively affect donation intentions. However, their impact mechanisms differ: moral identity is mainly a direct driver, whereas the impact of the bandwagon effect is strongly mediated through engagement with the charitable cause on social media. These findings highlight the complementary roles of intrinsic and socially driven motivations and contribute by integrating moral identity and bandwagon effect within a unified framework.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.70072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive research on charitable giving, studies tend to focus either on internal moral motivations or on external social influence, with limited integration of these two perspectives and little attention given to their joint impacts in digital philanthropic contexts. Addressing this gap, this study examines how donation intentions are driven by both moral identity and bandwagon effects and investigates the mediating role of engagement with the charitable cause on social media. Drawing on Social Identity Theory, we conceptualise moral identity as an intrinsic driver of prosocial behaviour, while the bandwagon effect reflects conformity to others' actions. Using survey data from 976 respondents in Lithuania and performing PLS-SEM analysis, this study tests both the direct and indirect effects of these factors on donation intentions in a crowdfunding context. The results show that both moral identity and the bandwagon effect positively affect donation intentions. However, their impact mechanisms differ: moral identity is mainly a direct driver, whereas the impact of the bandwagon effect is strongly mediated through engagement with the charitable cause on social media. These findings highlight the complementary roles of intrinsic and socially driven motivations and contribute by integrating moral identity and bandwagon effect within a unified framework.

捐赠的驱动因素:个人道德还是从众效应?
尽管对慈善捐赠进行了广泛的研究,但研究往往侧重于内部道德动机或外部社会影响,这两种观点的整合有限,很少关注它们在数字慈善背景下的共同影响。为了解决这一差距,本研究考察了道德认同和从众效应如何驱动捐赠意愿,并调查了社交媒体上参与慈善事业的中介作用。根据社会认同理论,我们将道德认同概念化为亲社会行为的内在驱动力,而从众效应则反映了对他人行为的遵从。本研究利用立陶宛976名受访者的调查数据,并进行PLS-SEM分析,测试了众筹背景下这些因素对捐赠意愿的直接和间接影响。结果表明,道德认同和从众效应对捐赠意愿均有正向影响。然而,他们的影响机制不同:道德认同主要是一个直接驱动因素,而从众效应的影响是通过参与社交媒体上的慈善事业来强烈中介的。这些发现强调了内在动机和社会驱动动机的互补作用,并将道德认同和从众效应整合在一个统一的框架内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书