Sampler-Induced Loss of Respiratory Virus Infectivity Revealed by Spiked Collection-Liquid Experiments

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Indoor air Pub Date : 2026-09-06 DOI:10.1155/ina/5068026
N. Thie, S. C. van Huizen, I. Janse, E. Duizer, G. Goderski, R. van Slooten, J. Kocken, L. C. Vermeulen
{"title":"Sampler-Induced Loss of Respiratory Virus Infectivity Revealed by Spiked Collection-Liquid Experiments","authors":"N. Thie,&nbsp;S. C. van Huizen,&nbsp;I. Janse,&nbsp;E. Duizer,&nbsp;G. Goderski,&nbsp;R. van Slooten,&nbsp;J. Kocken,&nbsp;L. C. Vermeulen","doi":"10.1155/ina/5068026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the transmission risk of respiratory viruses in indoor environments requires reliable detection of infectious particles in air samples. However, mechanical stress during air sampling may reduce the survival of infectious virus, complicating accurate assessment. This study investigated the impact of air sampler-induced mechanical stress on the RNA recovery and infectivity of rhinovirus, SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus using the Coriolis <i>μ</i> liquid impinger in an experimental setting with spiked collection liquids rather than aerosol or ambient air collection. Collection liquids were spiked with known virus concentrations and subjected to different airflow rates. Infectious virus titres and viral RNA copies were quantified by culture and PCR, respectively. Results demonstrated substantial reductions in culturable virus for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus (up to 98.6% loss) at the tested airflow speeds, whereas rhinovirus changes were minimal and of limited biological significance. Viral RNA concentrations remained mostly unchanged throughout all airflow speeds for SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus, but were reduced for influenza A virus. These findings suggest that mechanical stress caused by an air sampling device can significantly decrease the recovery of infectious viruses, which could lead to underestimation of the presence of infectious virus. Our results emphasise the need to account for virus-specific stability and sampler-induced inactivation when interpreting data from air sampling studies and assessing airborne transmission risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/5068026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/5068026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the transmission risk of respiratory viruses in indoor environments requires reliable detection of infectious particles in air samples. However, mechanical stress during air sampling may reduce the survival of infectious virus, complicating accurate assessment. This study investigated the impact of air sampler-induced mechanical stress on the RNA recovery and infectivity of rhinovirus, SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus using the Coriolis μ liquid impinger in an experimental setting with spiked collection liquids rather than aerosol or ambient air collection. Collection liquids were spiked with known virus concentrations and subjected to different airflow rates. Infectious virus titres and viral RNA copies were quantified by culture and PCR, respectively. Results demonstrated substantial reductions in culturable virus for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus (up to 98.6% loss) at the tested airflow speeds, whereas rhinovirus changes were minimal and of limited biological significance. Viral RNA concentrations remained mostly unchanged throughout all airflow speeds for SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus, but were reduced for influenza A virus. These findings suggest that mechanical stress caused by an air sampling device can significantly decrease the recovery of infectious viruses, which could lead to underestimation of the presence of infectious virus. Our results emphasise the need to account for virus-specific stability and sampler-induced inactivation when interpreting data from air sampling studies and assessing airborne transmission risk.

加标收集液实验揭示了采样器诱导的呼吸道病毒传染性丧失
了解呼吸道病毒在室内环境中的传播风险,需要对空气样本中的传染性颗粒进行可靠的检测。然而,空气采样过程中的机械应力可能降低传染性病毒的存活,使准确评估复杂化。本研究利用科里奥利μ液体撞击器,在实验环境中采用加钉采集液体而不是气溶胶或环境空气采集,研究了空气采样器诱导的机械应力对鼻病毒、SARS-CoV-2和甲型流感病毒RNA回收和传染性的影响。收集液体加入已知的病毒浓度,并经受不同的气流速率。分别用培养法和PCR法测定感染病毒滴度和病毒RNA拷贝数。结果显示,在测试的气流速度下,SARS-CoV-2和甲型流感病毒的可培养病毒显著减少(高达98.6%的损失),而鼻病毒的变化很小,生物学意义有限。在所有气流速度下,SARS-CoV-2和鼻病毒的病毒RNA浓度基本保持不变,但甲型流感病毒的病毒RNA浓度降低。这些发现表明,由空气采样装置引起的机械应力可显著降低感染性病毒的恢复,这可能导致对感染性病毒存在的低估。我们的研究结果强调,在解释来自空气采样研究的数据和评估空气传播风险时,需要考虑病毒特异性稳定性和采样器诱导的失活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indoor air
Indoor air 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health. Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques. The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书