Paddy residue and nitrogen effects on productivity and nutrient dynamics in rice-based systems of Telangana

IF 2.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
E. Ajay Kumar, R. Uma Reddy, Krishna Chaitanya Anantha, Ch. Ramulu, M. Malla Reddy, S. Triveni, S. Ajith
{"title":"Paddy residue and nitrogen effects on productivity and nutrient dynamics in rice-based systems of Telangana","authors":"E. Ajay Kumar,&nbsp;R. Uma Reddy,&nbsp;Krishna Chaitanya Anantha,&nbsp;Ch. Ramulu,&nbsp;M. Malla Reddy,&nbsp;S. Triveni,&nbsp;S. Ajith","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, rising paddy (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) production in India has increased residue production, yet its sustainable utilization remains limited. In situ straw incorporation is an effective residue management practice, but its field-scale applications on crop performance remain uncertain. Hence, this study was aimed at evaluate the influence of in situ straw incorporation and various nitrogen management options on productivity and nutrient dynamics in rice-based cropping systems. A preliminary survey across three agro-climatic zones of Telangana revealed that residue burning, use as cattle feed/sale, incorporation, and composting were the predominant practices with Garrett's scores of 65.4, 59.7, 47.2, and 27.6, respectively. Following survey results, a 2-year field study was conducted in rice–rice and rice–maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) cropping systems with various paddy straw (straw burning, straw incorporation, cutting, and removal) and nitrogen management options at 100%, 115%, and 130% RDN (recommended dose of nitrogen) Lower N rates were excluded to avoid N deficiency. Results revealed that in situ straw incorporation has significantly improved SPAD values (5% in rice, 4.6% in maize), dry matter accumulation (14.2% in rice, 6.6% in maize), returns net (12.6% in rice, 3.6% in maize) as compared to straw burning (control). Furthermore, in situ straw incorporation with 130% RDN enhanced grain yield, nitrogen uptake, and returns net compared to straw burning, which was statistically comparable with in situ straw incorporation with 115% RDN. Overall, in situ straw incorporation combined with optimized N management significantly enhanced crop productivity and N uptake in rice-based systems of Telangana, indicating its potential for sustainable intensification.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, rising paddy (Oryza sativa L.) production in India has increased residue production, yet its sustainable utilization remains limited. In situ straw incorporation is an effective residue management practice, but its field-scale applications on crop performance remain uncertain. Hence, this study was aimed at evaluate the influence of in situ straw incorporation and various nitrogen management options on productivity and nutrient dynamics in rice-based cropping systems. A preliminary survey across three agro-climatic zones of Telangana revealed that residue burning, use as cattle feed/sale, incorporation, and composting were the predominant practices with Garrett's scores of 65.4, 59.7, 47.2, and 27.6, respectively. Following survey results, a 2-year field study was conducted in rice–rice and rice–maize (Zea mays L.) cropping systems with various paddy straw (straw burning, straw incorporation, cutting, and removal) and nitrogen management options at 100%, 115%, and 130% RDN (recommended dose of nitrogen) Lower N rates were excluded to avoid N deficiency. Results revealed that in situ straw incorporation has significantly improved SPAD values (5% in rice, 4.6% in maize), dry matter accumulation (14.2% in rice, 6.6% in maize), returns net (12.6% in rice, 3.6% in maize) as compared to straw burning (control). Furthermore, in situ straw incorporation with 130% RDN enhanced grain yield, nitrogen uptake, and returns net compared to straw burning, which was statistically comparable with in situ straw incorporation with 115% RDN. Overall, in situ straw incorporation combined with optimized N management significantly enhanced crop productivity and N uptake in rice-based systems of Telangana, indicating its potential for sustainable intensification.

水稻残茬和氮素对特伦甘纳稻基系统生产力和养分动态的影响
近年来,印度水稻(Oryza sativa L.)产量的增加增加了秸秆产量,但其可持续利用仍然有限。秸秆就地还田是一种有效的秸秆管理方法,但其对作物生产性能的田间规模应用仍不确定。因此,本研究旨在评估秸秆就地还田和不同氮肥管理方案对水稻种植系统生产力和养分动态的影响。对特伦甘纳三个农业气候带的初步调查显示,秸秆焚烧、用作牛饲料/销售、合并和堆肥是主要的做法,加勒特得分分别为65.4、59.7、47.2和27.6。根据调查结果,在水稻-水稻和水稻-玉米(Zea mays L.)种植系统中进行了为期2年的田间研究,采用不同的水稻秸秆(秸秆焚烧、秸秆掺入、秸秆切割和去除)和100%、115%和130% RDN(推荐施氮量)的氮肥管理方案。结果表明,与秸秆焚烧(对照)相比,秸秆就地还田显著提高了SPAD值(水稻5%,玉米4.6%)、干物质积累(水稻14.2%,玉米6.6%)和净收益(水稻12.6%,玉米3.6%)。此外,与秸秆燃烧相比,秸秆就地还田(RDN为130%)提高了粮食产量、氮素吸收和净收益,与秸秆就地还田(RDN为115%)在统计学上相当。总体而言,秸秆就地还田与优化的氮素管理相结合,显著提高了特伦甘纳稻基系统的作物生产力和氮素吸收,表明其具有可持续集约化的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书