Fred Teasley, Joshua Heitman, Stephanie Kulesza, Matthew Ricker, David Suchoff, Alex Woodley
{"title":"Management of cover crops and soil amendments affect yield outcomes during organic transition","authors":"Fred Teasley, Joshua Heitman, Stephanie Kulesza, Matthew Ricker, David Suchoff, Alex Woodley","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study sought to assess the impact of cover cropping and high rates of soil amendments on crop yield during organic transition. Compost, biochar, or a “50/50” mixture of the two on a C-equivalent basis were applied at a rate of 8 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> per varying application regimens, with and without cover crops, at two locations on the North Carolina Coastal Plain with sandy, low-C soils. It was hypothesized that the treatments would increase crop yield due to soil organic carbon–driven improvements in soil health, such as enhanced nutrient availability. Rather than increase yield, however, cover cropping and compost additions resulted in 15%–20% yield reductions for cash crops following a legume cover crop. The results suggest that the treatments, which provided N in excess of crop needs, drove late-season weed growth past the window for mechanical cultivation and led to subsequent yield reductions. Additionally, poor synchrony between cover crop N and cash crop demand was observed in a year where crimson clover was terminated late and its residue had a high C:N ratio (>30). These results were observed in a unique context, where organic management was implemented and N-related best practices concerning cover crop termination timing and fertilizer rate adjustment were intentionally deviated from in order to maximize the C input and to avoid yield differences resulting from varying N fertilizer rates, respectively. This study highlights the negative consequences of suboptimal N management and weed dynamics on crop productivity in Southeastern organic management systems with no rescue herbicides.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study sought to assess the impact of cover cropping and high rates of soil amendments on crop yield during organic transition. Compost, biochar, or a “50/50” mixture of the two on a C-equivalent basis were applied at a rate of 8 Mg C ha−1 per varying application regimens, with and without cover crops, at two locations on the North Carolina Coastal Plain with sandy, low-C soils. It was hypothesized that the treatments would increase crop yield due to soil organic carbon–driven improvements in soil health, such as enhanced nutrient availability. Rather than increase yield, however, cover cropping and compost additions resulted in 15%–20% yield reductions for cash crops following a legume cover crop. The results suggest that the treatments, which provided N in excess of crop needs, drove late-season weed growth past the window for mechanical cultivation and led to subsequent yield reductions. Additionally, poor synchrony between cover crop N and cash crop demand was observed in a year where crimson clover was terminated late and its residue had a high C:N ratio (>30). These results were observed in a unique context, where organic management was implemented and N-related best practices concerning cover crop termination timing and fertilizer rate adjustment were intentionally deviated from in order to maximize the C input and to avoid yield differences resulting from varying N fertilizer rates, respectively. This study highlights the negative consequences of suboptimal N management and weed dynamics on crop productivity in Southeastern organic management systems with no rescue herbicides.
本研究旨在评估有机过渡期间覆盖种植和高土壤改良率对作物产量的影响。在北卡罗莱纳海岸平原的两个地点,采用沙质低碳土壤,在不同的施用方案下,以8 Mg C ha - 1的速率施用堆肥、生物炭或两者的“50/50”混合物,其碳当量为C- 1,有或没有覆盖作物。据推测,由于土壤有机碳驱动的土壤健康改善,如提高养分有效性,这些处理将增加作物产量。然而,覆盖种植和添加堆肥并没有提高产量,反而导致经济作物在种植豆类覆盖作物后减产15%-20%。结果表明,氮素过量的处理导致后期杂草生长超过机械栽培的窗口期,导致随后的产量下降。此外,在深红三叶草终止较晚且其残茬碳氮比较高的年份,覆盖作物氮与经济作物需求之间的同步性较差(>30)。这些结果是在一个独特的背景下观察到的,在这个背景下,为了最大限度地增加碳投入,为了避免不同的氮肥施用量造成的产量差异,在实施有机管理和有意偏离与氮相关的覆盖作物终止时间和肥料用量调整的最佳做法。本研究强调了在东南地区无救援除草剂的有机管理系统中,次优氮管理和杂草动态对作物生产力的负面影响。
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.