Prevalence and risk factors of hearing disorders among working populations – A systematic review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104927
Mohd Firdaus Ismail, Sheng Qian Yew, Zhi Qin Ooi, Hanizah Mohd Yusoff
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors of hearing disorders among working populations – A systematic review","authors":"Mohd Firdaus Ismail,&nbsp;Sheng Qian Yew,&nbsp;Zhi Qin Ooi,&nbsp;Hanizah Mohd Yusoff","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of different subtypes of hearing disorders (hearing loss, noise-induced hearing loss, hearing impairment, and standard threshold shift) as well as to identify the risk factors associated with hearing disorders in working populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for English-language studies published from 2016 to 2025. Eligible studies included studies that were conducted among worker populations and those reported prevalence and/or risk factors of hearing disorders. Extracted data include study countries, industrial sectors, subtypes of hearing disorders, assessment tools for hearing disorders, prevalence (or incidence) estimates, and risk factors. Commonly reported risk factors were identified through descriptive analysis and van Tulder's criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 47 studies included, the prevalence of hearing loss, NIHL, and hearing impairment ranged from 3.8%–73.5%, 0.2%–63.6%, and 2.7%–71.2%, respectively. The prevalence of STS was 50.0%. There were 89 risk factors of hearing disorders, across eight domains, namely medical conditions (25 risk factors), work-related (18 risk factors), noise-related (13 risk factors), lifestyle (12 risk factors), sociodemographic characteristics (8 risk factors), HPD-related (5 risk factors), exposure to other occupational hazards (4 risk factors), and knowledge-related (4 risk factors). Among these 89 risk factors, only noise exposure and previous smoking showed consistent associations with hearing disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The prevalence of hearing loss varied widely. Among the 89 reported risk factors (across eight domains) of hearing disorders, only noise exposure and previous smoking showed consistent associations with hearing disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"47 5","pages":"Article 104927"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070926001432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of different subtypes of hearing disorders (hearing loss, noise-induced hearing loss, hearing impairment, and standard threshold shift) as well as to identify the risk factors associated with hearing disorders in working populations.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for English-language studies published from 2016 to 2025. Eligible studies included studies that were conducted among worker populations and those reported prevalence and/or risk factors of hearing disorders. Extracted data include study countries, industrial sectors, subtypes of hearing disorders, assessment tools for hearing disorders, prevalence (or incidence) estimates, and risk factors. Commonly reported risk factors were identified through descriptive analysis and van Tulder's criteria.

Results

Among the 47 studies included, the prevalence of hearing loss, NIHL, and hearing impairment ranged from 3.8%–73.5%, 0.2%–63.6%, and 2.7%–71.2%, respectively. The prevalence of STS was 50.0%. There were 89 risk factors of hearing disorders, across eight domains, namely medical conditions (25 risk factors), work-related (18 risk factors), noise-related (13 risk factors), lifestyle (12 risk factors), sociodemographic characteristics (8 risk factors), HPD-related (5 risk factors), exposure to other occupational hazards (4 risk factors), and knowledge-related (4 risk factors). Among these 89 risk factors, only noise exposure and previous smoking showed consistent associations with hearing disorders.

Conclusion

The prevalence of hearing loss varied widely. Among the 89 reported risk factors (across eight domains) of hearing disorders, only noise exposure and previous smoking showed consistent associations with hearing disorders.
工作人群中听力障碍的患病率和危险因素-一项系统综述
本系统综述旨在确定不同亚型听力障碍(听力损失、噪声性听力损失、听力障碍和标准阈值移位)的患病率,并确定与工作人群听力障碍相关的危险因素。方法系统检索2016 - 2025年在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中发表的英文论文。符合条件的研究包括在工人人群中进行的研究以及报告的听力障碍患病率和/或危险因素的研究。提取的数据包括研究国家、工业部门、听力障碍亚型、听力障碍评估工具、患病率(或发病率)估计值以及风险因素。通过描述性分析和van Tulder标准确定常见的危险因素。结果纳入的47项研究中,听力损失、NIHL和听力障碍的患病率分别为3.8% ~ 73.5%、0.2% ~ 63.6%和2.7% ~ 71.2%。STS患病率为50.0%。听力障碍的危险因素共89个,涉及8个领域,即医疗条件(25个危险因素)、工作相关(18个危险因素)、噪声相关(13个危险因素)、生活方式(12个危险因素)、社会人口统计学特征(8个危险因素)、hpd相关(5个危险因素)、接触其他职业危害(4个危险因素)和知识相关(4个危险因素)。在这89个风险因素中,只有噪音暴露和以前吸烟与听力障碍有一致的联系。结论听力损失的患病率差异较大。在报告的89个听力障碍风险因素(跨越8个领域)中,只有噪音暴露和以前吸烟与听力障碍有一致的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书