Food waste compost assessment via physicochemical analysis and metagenomic profiling

IF 5 Q1 Environmental Science
Bioresource Technology Reports Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102961
Wei Si Soong, Jactty Chew, Mohamed Kheireddine Aroua, Lai Ti Gew
{"title":"Food waste compost assessment via physicochemical analysis and metagenomic profiling","authors":"Wei Si Soong,&nbsp;Jactty Chew,&nbsp;Mohamed Kheireddine Aroua,&nbsp;Lai Ti Gew","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food waste composting offers a sustainable approach for diverting food waste from landfills while producing nutrient-rich soil amendments. However, comprehensive evaluations of compost quality derived from diverse food waste streams remain scarce. This study characterized and compared three in-house food waste composts (Composts A–C), collected from a university, a hotel, and a shopping mall—each with varying feedstock compositions, but produced using the same aerobic composting technology, with a commercially available plant waste compost (Compost D, control). Moisture content, pH, nutrient contents, and microbial communities were determined via shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Compost A exhibited comparable pH (6.31), C/N ratio (14.07), and nutrient levels (N: 3.04, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>: 0.95, K<sub>2</sub>O: 2.74) to the Compost D, suggesting a similar maturity based on physicochemical indicators. Metagenomic analysis revealed that Compost A was predominantly composed of fungi (81.43%), while Compost B (82.88%), C (97.35%) and D (90.84%) were bacterially dominated. Compost A and B were enriched in beneficial taxa—Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota—commonly associated with organic matter degradation and nutrient transformation processes. Functional annotation identified genes related to information processing, metabolism, and cellular functions across compost samples, indicating active microbial roles in nutrient cycling. Notably, in-house composts showed lower occurrences of pathogens (<em>Begomovirus, Jasminevirus</em>) and antibiotic resistance genes (e.g., <em>tet(L), ermA</em>) compared to commercial compost. These findings indicate that these in-house food waste composts can exhibit physicochemical and microbial characteristics comparable to commercial compost. Further studies, including field-based assessments, are required to validate their agronomic performance and safety for practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 102961"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X26004196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food waste composting offers a sustainable approach for diverting food waste from landfills while producing nutrient-rich soil amendments. However, comprehensive evaluations of compost quality derived from diverse food waste streams remain scarce. This study characterized and compared three in-house food waste composts (Composts A–C), collected from a university, a hotel, and a shopping mall—each with varying feedstock compositions, but produced using the same aerobic composting technology, with a commercially available plant waste compost (Compost D, control). Moisture content, pH, nutrient contents, and microbial communities were determined via shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Compost A exhibited comparable pH (6.31), C/N ratio (14.07), and nutrient levels (N: 3.04, P2O5: 0.95, K2O: 2.74) to the Compost D, suggesting a similar maturity based on physicochemical indicators. Metagenomic analysis revealed that Compost A was predominantly composed of fungi (81.43%), while Compost B (82.88%), C (97.35%) and D (90.84%) were bacterially dominated. Compost A and B were enriched in beneficial taxa—Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota—commonly associated with organic matter degradation and nutrient transformation processes. Functional annotation identified genes related to information processing, metabolism, and cellular functions across compost samples, indicating active microbial roles in nutrient cycling. Notably, in-house composts showed lower occurrences of pathogens (Begomovirus, Jasminevirus) and antibiotic resistance genes (e.g., tet(L), ermA) compared to commercial compost. These findings indicate that these in-house food waste composts can exhibit physicochemical and microbial characteristics comparable to commercial compost. Further studies, including field-based assessments, are required to validate their agronomic performance and safety for practical applications.
通过理化分析和宏基因组分析评估食物垃圾堆肥
食物垃圾堆肥提供了一种可持续的方法,可以转移垃圾填埋场的食物垃圾,同时产生富含营养的土壤改良剂。然而,对来自不同食物垃圾流的堆肥质量的综合评估仍然很少。本研究对从大学、酒店和购物中心收集的三种室内食物垃圾堆肥(堆肥a - c)进行了表征和比较,每种堆肥都有不同的原料成分,但使用相同的好氧堆肥技术生产,并使用商业上可用的植物垃圾堆肥(堆肥D,对照)。通过散弹枪宏基因组测序测定水分含量、pH值、营养成分含量和微生物群落。堆肥A的pH值(6.31)、C/N比(14.07)和养分水平(N: 3.04, P2O5: 0.95, K2O: 2.74)与堆肥D相当,从理化指标上看,两者成熟度相近。宏基因组分析显示,A堆肥以真菌为主(81.43%),B堆肥以细菌为主(82.88%),C堆肥以细菌为主(97.35%),D堆肥以细菌为主(90.84%)。堆肥A和B富含有益菌群——变形菌门、厚壁菌门、放线菌门、子囊菌门和担子菌门,这些菌群通常与有机物降解和养分转化过程有关。功能注释鉴定了与堆肥样品的信息处理、代谢和细胞功能相关的基因,表明微生物在养分循环中起着积极的作用。值得注意的是,与商业堆肥相比,室内堆肥显示出较低的病原体(Begomovirus, jasminavirus)和抗生素抗性基因(例如tet(L), ermA)的发生率。这些发现表明,这些室内食物垃圾堆肥可以表现出与商业堆肥相当的物理化学和微生物特性。需要进一步的研究,包括实地评估,以验证它们的农艺性能和实际应用的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioresource Technology Reports
Bioresource Technology Reports Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
390
审稿时长
28 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书