Accuracy and robustness assessment of ANN and fast convergence approaches for solar power optimization

Solar Compass Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.solcom.2026.100188
Abdel Hamid Adaliou, Mostafa El Ouariachi, Kamal Hirech
{"title":"Accuracy and robustness assessment of ANN and fast convergence approaches for solar power optimization","authors":"Abdel Hamid Adaliou,&nbsp;Mostafa El Ouariachi,&nbsp;Kamal Hirech","doi":"10.1016/j.solcom.2026.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conversion chain forms the core of the photovoltaic (PV) system upon which the algorithms used are crucial for optimizing the aforementioned conversion chain. This article addresses an exploration of the optimization of the energy produced by the PV panel by comparing the use of artificial intelligence, that is, artificial neural networks (ANN), with our previously proposed fast convergence approach (FC). The utilization of ANN demonstrates their efficiency and stability for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) against varying irradiation and temperature. Both methods demonstrate their robustness and offer high performance under varying weather conditions; however, the results verify that they are different in certain instances. Subject to varying irradiation but stable temperature scenarios, the FC technique exhibits a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 1.08%, compared to that of 1.12% by the ANN. That indicates that both algorithms can track effectively the maximum power point but the FC technique tracks more, despite varying weather conditions especially variable irradiation. Similarly, subject to stable irradiation and varying temperature scenarios, the FC technique verifies a MAPE of 2.18%, also lower than that of the ANN of 2.67%. These results indicate that the ANN algorithm present a good stability in permanent regime when the FC technique offers a more precision despite the presence of oscillations in its steady-state response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101173,"journal":{"name":"Solar Compass","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940026000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conversion chain forms the core of the photovoltaic (PV) system upon which the algorithms used are crucial for optimizing the aforementioned conversion chain. This article addresses an exploration of the optimization of the energy produced by the PV panel by comparing the use of artificial intelligence, that is, artificial neural networks (ANN), with our previously proposed fast convergence approach (FC). The utilization of ANN demonstrates their efficiency and stability for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) against varying irradiation and temperature. Both methods demonstrate their robustness and offer high performance under varying weather conditions; however, the results verify that they are different in certain instances. Subject to varying irradiation but stable temperature scenarios, the FC technique exhibits a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 1.08%, compared to that of 1.12% by the ANN. That indicates that both algorithms can track effectively the maximum power point but the FC technique tracks more, despite varying weather conditions especially variable irradiation. Similarly, subject to stable irradiation and varying temperature scenarios, the FC technique verifies a MAPE of 2.18%, also lower than that of the ANN of 2.67%. These results indicate that the ANN algorithm present a good stability in permanent regime when the FC technique offers a more precision despite the presence of oscillations in its steady-state response.
人工神经网络和快速收敛方法在太阳能发电优化中的准确性和鲁棒性评估
转换链是光伏(PV)系统的核心,所使用的算法对于优化上述转换链至关重要。本文通过比较人工智能(即人工神经网络(ANN))与我们之前提出的快速收敛方法(FC)的使用,探讨了光伏电池板产生的能量的优化。人工神经网络的应用证明了其在不同辐照和温度下最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)的有效性和稳定性。这两种方法都证明了它们的鲁棒性,并在不同的天气条件下提供高性能;然而,结果证实它们在某些情况下是不同的。在不同辐照但温度稳定的情况下,FC技术的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为1.08%,而人工神经网络的平均绝对百分比误差为1.12%。这表明两种算法都可以有效地跟踪最大功率点,但FC技术跟踪更多,尽管天气条件不同,特别是辐射变化。同样,在稳定辐照和变温度情景下,FC技术的MAPE为2.18%,也低于人工神经网络的2.67%。这些结果表明,尽管在其稳态响应中存在振荡,但当FC技术提供更高的精度时,人工神经网络算法在永久状态下具有良好的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书