Purposeful Practice Opportunities: How Guided and Independent Practice Informs Number Sense Development

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Tasia Brafford,Christian T. Doabler,Jenna A. Gersib,Cayla Lussier,Ben Clarke,Jessica Turtura,Bailee N. Sutton,Derek Kosty
{"title":"Purposeful Practice Opportunities: How Guided and Independent Practice Informs Number Sense Development","authors":"Tasia Brafford,Christian T. Doabler,Jenna A. Gersib,Cayla Lussier,Ben Clarke,Jessica Turtura,Bailee N. Sutton,Derek Kosty","doi":"10.1177/09388982261448180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although practice is essential for academic development, questions remain regarding how much and what kinds of practice best support early learners. To examine the role of practice in developing mathematical proficiency, we analyzed rates of guided and independent practice opportunities provided in a kindergarten mathematics intervention for 880 students with mathematics difficulties (MD) across 255 groups. Results indicate that (a) students’ initial skills levels did not predict rates of practice opportunities provided, (b) rates of practice were not associated with student performance changes, (c) effects were not moderated by initial skills, and (d) no optimal ratio of guided to independent practice, or guided practice to academic feedback, emerged. Findings suggest that while providing deliberate, purposeful practice is crucial, effectiveness does not depend on fixed thresholds. Instead, teachers should scaffold practice opportunities based on student need, adjusting supported and independent practice within high-quality instruction. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47426,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":"150 1","pages":"265-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982261448180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although practice is essential for academic development, questions remain regarding how much and what kinds of practice best support early learners. To examine the role of practice in developing mathematical proficiency, we analyzed rates of guided and independent practice opportunities provided in a kindergarten mathematics intervention for 880 students with mathematics difficulties (MD) across 255 groups. Results indicate that (a) students’ initial skills levels did not predict rates of practice opportunities provided, (b) rates of practice were not associated with student performance changes, (c) effects were not moderated by initial skills, and (d) no optimal ratio of guided to independent practice, or guided practice to academic feedback, emerged. Findings suggest that while providing deliberate, purposeful practice is crucial, effectiveness does not depend on fixed thresholds. Instead, teachers should scaffold practice opportunities based on student need, adjusting supported and independent practice within high-quality instruction. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
有目的的实践机会:指导和独立的实践如何促进数感的发展
尽管实践对学术发展至关重要,但关于多少以及什么样的实践对早期学习者最有效的问题仍然存在。为了检验实践在培养数学能力中的作用,我们分析了在幼儿园数学干预中为255个组880名有数学困难(MD)的学生提供的指导和独立实践机会的比率。结果表明:(a)学生的初始技能水平不能预测提供的实践机会的比率,(b)实践率与学生的成绩变化无关,(c)效果不受初始技能的影响,(d)没有出现指导与独立实践或指导实践与学术反馈的最佳比例。研究结果表明,虽然提供深思熟虑的、有目的的练习至关重要,但效果并不取决于固定的阈值。相反,教师应该根据学生的需要来构建实践机会,在高质量的教学中调整支持和独立的实践。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书