Safety and Efficacy of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (EV-ICD) in Japanese Patients: Final Results From the EV ICD Japan Study.
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (EV-ICD) in Japanese Patients: Final Results From the EV ICD Japan Study.","authors":"Mitsuru Wada, Nobuhiro Nishii, Kohei Ishibashi, Christopher Wiggenhorn, Takuto Yamamoto, Kengo Kusano","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-26-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) has proven efficacy and a low complication rate in global populations, but data from Japanese patients is limited. We report the safety and efficacy of the EV-ICD system in a Japanese cohort through 12 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients from Japan with a Class I or IIa indication for a single-chamber ICD were enrolled and implanted with the EV-ICD system. Defibrillation success was determined following implant. System programming changes, device electrical performance, freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications through 12 months post-implant, and follow-up status at all visits were assessed. From February to September 2023, 14 patients (12 males, 2 females) were enrolled and successfully implanted across 2 sites (age: 53.6±14.7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 52.6±15.6%; secondary prevention: 42.9%). Defibrillation testing was successful in all patients (14/14, 100%). At 2 weeks and 12 months, freedom from major system- and/or procedure-related complications was 92.9% and 85.7%, respectively. One patient received 7 appropriate shocks that were successful in terminating the arrhythmia. There were no inappropriate shocks delivered, and a single inappropriate antitachycardia pacing therapy was delivered through follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EV-ICD system was safely implanted and effective at terminating both induced and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in a small cohort of Japanese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"8 9","pages":"1396-1403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13558269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-26-0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) has proven efficacy and a low complication rate in global populations, but data from Japanese patients is limited. We report the safety and efficacy of the EV-ICD system in a Japanese cohort through 12 months of follow-up.
Methods and results: Patients from Japan with a Class I or IIa indication for a single-chamber ICD were enrolled and implanted with the EV-ICD system. Defibrillation success was determined following implant. System programming changes, device electrical performance, freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications through 12 months post-implant, and follow-up status at all visits were assessed. From February to September 2023, 14 patients (12 males, 2 females) were enrolled and successfully implanted across 2 sites (age: 53.6±14.7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 52.6±15.6%; secondary prevention: 42.9%). Defibrillation testing was successful in all patients (14/14, 100%). At 2 weeks and 12 months, freedom from major system- and/or procedure-related complications was 92.9% and 85.7%, respectively. One patient received 7 appropriate shocks that were successful in terminating the arrhythmia. There were no inappropriate shocks delivered, and a single inappropriate antitachycardia pacing therapy was delivered through follow-up.
Conclusions: The EV-ICD system was safely implanted and effective at terminating both induced and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in a small cohort of Japanese patients.