Why atrial fibrillation ablation remains underused in EuroAsia Task Force countries: insights from the ESC-EHRA Atlas and a regional survey.

Ayan Abdrakhmanov, Zhansaya Zhumagali, Cecilia Linde, Zhanasyl Suleymen, Salim Berkinbayev, Zhanar Abdrakhmanova, Moldir Yerikkyzy, Assel Chinybayeva, Elmira Yessimbekova, Jacek Bil, Robert J Gil
{"title":"Why atrial fibrillation ablation remains underused in EuroAsia Task Force countries: insights from the ESC-EHRA Atlas and a regional survey.","authors":"Ayan Abdrakhmanov, Zhansaya Zhumagali, Cecilia Linde, Zhanasyl Suleymen, Salim Berkinbayev, Zhanar Abdrakhmanova, Moldir Yerikkyzy, Assel Chinybayeva, Elmira Yessimbekova, Jacek Bil, Robert J Gil","doi":"10.5603/cj.112081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing worldwide, yet access to catheter ablation remains uneven across regions. This study aimed to compare access to AF ablation across seven EuroAsia Task Force countries and identify barriers and potential strategies for improving service provision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study combined a secondary analysis of the 2025 European Society of Cardiology - European Heart Rhythm Association (ESC-EHRA) Atlas on Heart Rhythm Disorders with a structured regional survey. Procedural activity, infrastructure, and workforce indicators were compared with ESC reference medians and expressed per million population. Missing data for Turkmenistan were obtained from the national representative (2023). Exploratory correlations between ablation rates and healthcare expenditure indicators were assessed, including current health expenditure as a percentage of gross domestic product, out-of-pocket expenditure, domestic general government health expenditure, and current health expenditure per capita.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AF ablation volume ranged from 2 to 190 procedures per million population, with six of seven countries below the European median (151 per million). Hospitals performing ablation ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 per million, with only one country exceeding the ESC median. No country met benchmarks for high-volume ablation centers or operator density. Fellowship density was low (0.1-1.3 per million). Financial barriers were identified as the main obstacle by five of six country representatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to AF ablation in EuroAsia Task Force countries is low and heterogeneous. Healthcare financing structure and per-capita health spending may be more important determinants of access than overall expenditure relative to gross domestic product.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"33 ","pages":"e00226069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13576677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.112081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing worldwide, yet access to catheter ablation remains uneven across regions. This study aimed to compare access to AF ablation across seven EuroAsia Task Force countries and identify barriers and potential strategies for improving service provision.

Methods: This cross-sectional study combined a secondary analysis of the 2025 European Society of Cardiology - European Heart Rhythm Association (ESC-EHRA) Atlas on Heart Rhythm Disorders with a structured regional survey. Procedural activity, infrastructure, and workforce indicators were compared with ESC reference medians and expressed per million population. Missing data for Turkmenistan were obtained from the national representative (2023). Exploratory correlations between ablation rates and healthcare expenditure indicators were assessed, including current health expenditure as a percentage of gross domestic product, out-of-pocket expenditure, domestic general government health expenditure, and current health expenditure per capita.

Results: AF ablation volume ranged from 2 to 190 procedures per million population, with six of seven countries below the European median (151 per million). Hospitals performing ablation ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 per million, with only one country exceeding the ESC median. No country met benchmarks for high-volume ablation centers or operator density. Fellowship density was low (0.1-1.3 per million). Financial barriers were identified as the main obstacle by five of six country representatives.

Conclusions: Access to AF ablation in EuroAsia Task Force countries is low and heterogeneous. Healthcare financing structure and per-capita health spending may be more important determinants of access than overall expenditure relative to gross domestic product.

为什么房颤消融在欧亚工作组国家仍未得到充分利用:来自ESC-EHRA地图集和区域调查的见解
背景:房颤(AF)的患病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,但各地区间导管消融的可及性仍不均衡。本研究旨在比较七个欧亚工作组国家房颤消融的可及性,并确定改善服务提供的障碍和潜在策略。方法:这项横断面研究结合了2025年欧洲心脏病学会-欧洲心律协会(ESC-EHRA)心律紊乱地图集的二次分析和结构化的区域调查。程序活动、基础设施和劳动力指标比较了ESC参考中位数,并表示为每百万人口。土库曼斯坦的缺失数据来自国家代表(2023年)。评估了消融率与卫生保健支出指标之间的探索性相关性,包括当前卫生支出占国内生产总值的百分比、自掏腰包支出、国内一般政府卫生支出和当前人均卫生支出。结果:房颤消融量范围为每百万人2 - 190例,7个国家中有6个低于欧洲中位数(每百万人151例)。实施消融术的医院从每百万人0.1到1.9不等,只有一个国家超过了ESC的中位数。没有一个国家达到大容量消融中心或操作人员密度的基准。团契密度低(0.1-1.3 /百万人)。6个国家代表中有5个认为财政障碍是主要障碍。结论:在欧亚工作组国家,房颤消融的可及性低且异质性大。保健融资结构和人均保健支出可能是决定获得机会的更重要因素,而不是相对于国内生产总值的总支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书