Evaluating the generalisability of LiSep LSTM for early prediction of septic shock across US and european cohorts.

IF 4.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hong K Tan, Logan Froese, Daniel Wilhelms, Josef Fagerström, Michelle S Chew
{"title":"Evaluating the generalisability of LiSep LSTM for early prediction of septic shock across US and european cohorts.","authors":"Hong K Tan, Logan Froese, Daniel Wilhelms, Josef Fagerström, Michelle S Chew","doi":"10.1038/s41598-026-63350-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis remains a major public health concern and is associated with high mortality. Early detection and timely intervention are critical for improving outcomes, yet no standardised approach has been universally adopted. The LiSep LSTM model, a Long Short-Term Memory neural network developed using the MIMIC-III database, has demonstrated promising predictive performance but generalisability across regions has not yet been explored. This study evaluated the LiSep LSTM model in an independent European cohort from the AmsterdamUMC (AUMC) database. Model performance was assessed using internal, external, and pooled validation to examine the effects of distributional shift and data heterogeneity across cohorts. Permutation feature importance (PFI) was further applied to quantify each feature's contribution to model performance across evaluation settings. When tested on the AUMC cohort, the model achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.8851 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8612-0.909) with a median Hours Before Onset (HBO) of 47.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 16.0-255.0), slightly outperforming its performance on MIMIC-III. External validation showed reduced calibration and recall, while pooled training improved AUROC and Brier score relative to external-only evaluation. Accuracy was moderate (0.60-0.77) and precision remained low (0.01-0.17), indicating a substantial false-positive burden. These findings suggest that pooled training enhances robustness and supports earlier identification of septic shock, but local calibration and strategies to manage false alarms remain necessary for reliable deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63350-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major public health concern and is associated with high mortality. Early detection and timely intervention are critical for improving outcomes, yet no standardised approach has been universally adopted. The LiSep LSTM model, a Long Short-Term Memory neural network developed using the MIMIC-III database, has demonstrated promising predictive performance but generalisability across regions has not yet been explored. This study evaluated the LiSep LSTM model in an independent European cohort from the AmsterdamUMC (AUMC) database. Model performance was assessed using internal, external, and pooled validation to examine the effects of distributional shift and data heterogeneity across cohorts. Permutation feature importance (PFI) was further applied to quantify each feature's contribution to model performance across evaluation settings. When tested on the AUMC cohort, the model achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.8851 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8612-0.909) with a median Hours Before Onset (HBO) of 47.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 16.0-255.0), slightly outperforming its performance on MIMIC-III. External validation showed reduced calibration and recall, while pooled training improved AUROC and Brier score relative to external-only evaluation. Accuracy was moderate (0.60-0.77) and precision remained low (0.01-0.17), indicating a substantial false-positive burden. These findings suggest that pooled training enhances robustness and supports earlier identification of septic shock, but local calibration and strategies to manage false alarms remain necessary for reliable deployment.

评估LiSep LSTM在美国和欧洲人群中早期预测感染性休克的普遍性。
败血症仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题,与高死亡率有关。早期发现和及时干预对于改善结果至关重要,但尚未普遍采用标准化方法。LiSep LSTM模型是一种使用MIMIC-III数据库开发的长短期记忆神经网络,已经证明了有希望的预测性能,但尚未探索跨区域的通用性。本研究在一个来自阿姆斯特丹umc (AUMC)数据库的独立欧洲队列中评估LiSep LSTM模型。使用内部、外部和合并验证来评估模型性能,以检查分布转移和数据异质性对队列的影响。进一步应用排列特征重要性(PFI)来量化每个特征对跨评估设置的模型性能的贡献。在AUMC队列中进行测试时,该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.8851(95%置信区间[CI] 0.8612-0.909),中位发病前小时(HBO)为47.0小时(四分位数间距[IQR]: 16.0-255.0),略优于MIMIC-III的表现。外部验证显示校准和召回率降低,而集合训练相对于单独的外部评估提高了AUROC和Brier评分。准确度中等(0.60-0.77),准确度仍然很低(0.01-0.17),表明存在大量假阳性负担。这些发现表明,集合训练增强了鲁棒性,并支持脓毒性休克的早期识别,但对于可靠的部署,本地校准和管理假警报的策略仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书