Hong K Tan, Logan Froese, Daniel Wilhelms, Josef Fagerström, Michelle S Chew
{"title":"Evaluating the generalisability of LiSep LSTM for early prediction of septic shock across US and european cohorts.","authors":"Hong K Tan, Logan Froese, Daniel Wilhelms, Josef Fagerström, Michelle S Chew","doi":"10.1038/s41598-026-63350-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis remains a major public health concern and is associated with high mortality. Early detection and timely intervention are critical for improving outcomes, yet no standardised approach has been universally adopted. The LiSep LSTM model, a Long Short-Term Memory neural network developed using the MIMIC-III database, has demonstrated promising predictive performance but generalisability across regions has not yet been explored. This study evaluated the LiSep LSTM model in an independent European cohort from the AmsterdamUMC (AUMC) database. Model performance was assessed using internal, external, and pooled validation to examine the effects of distributional shift and data heterogeneity across cohorts. Permutation feature importance (PFI) was further applied to quantify each feature's contribution to model performance across evaluation settings. When tested on the AUMC cohort, the model achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.8851 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8612-0.909) with a median Hours Before Onset (HBO) of 47.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 16.0-255.0), slightly outperforming its performance on MIMIC-III. External validation showed reduced calibration and recall, while pooled training improved AUROC and Brier score relative to external-only evaluation. Accuracy was moderate (0.60-0.77) and precision remained low (0.01-0.17), indicating a substantial false-positive burden. These findings suggest that pooled training enhances robustness and supports earlier identification of septic shock, but local calibration and strategies to manage false alarms remain necessary for reliable deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63350-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sepsis remains a major public health concern and is associated with high mortality. Early detection and timely intervention are critical for improving outcomes, yet no standardised approach has been universally adopted. The LiSep LSTM model, a Long Short-Term Memory neural network developed using the MIMIC-III database, has demonstrated promising predictive performance but generalisability across regions has not yet been explored. This study evaluated the LiSep LSTM model in an independent European cohort from the AmsterdamUMC (AUMC) database. Model performance was assessed using internal, external, and pooled validation to examine the effects of distributional shift and data heterogeneity across cohorts. Permutation feature importance (PFI) was further applied to quantify each feature's contribution to model performance across evaluation settings. When tested on the AUMC cohort, the model achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.8851 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8612-0.909) with a median Hours Before Onset (HBO) of 47.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 16.0-255.0), slightly outperforming its performance on MIMIC-III. External validation showed reduced calibration and recall, while pooled training improved AUROC and Brier score relative to external-only evaluation. Accuracy was moderate (0.60-0.77) and precision remained low (0.01-0.17), indicating a substantial false-positive burden. These findings suggest that pooled training enhances robustness and supports earlier identification of septic shock, but local calibration and strategies to manage false alarms remain necessary for reliable deployment.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.