[Quantitative Evaluation of Assistant Intervention in Robotic-assisted Lung Resection and Feasibility of Solo-surgery].

Q4 Medicine
Satoshi Hayashi, Masaya Kawada, Kichizo Kaga
{"title":"[Quantitative Evaluation of Assistant Intervention in Robotic-assisted Lung Resection and Feasibility of Solo-surgery].","authors":"Satoshi Hayashi, Masaya Kawada, Kichizo Kaga","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted thoracic surgery( RATS), the role of surgical assistants has evolved compared to traditional open or video-assisted thoracic surgery( VATS). At our institution, a 5-port look-up view approach with the da Vinci Xi system has been in use since May 2021, and since June 2024, we have transitioned to a solo-surgery approach in which the primary surgeon independently manages both console operation and surgical field exposure. In this retrospective single-center study, we quantitatively evaluated assistant interventions in 115 cases during the introduction phase and 45 cases during the solo-surgery phase. Assistant interventions such as suctioning and retraction significantly decreased in the solo-surgery phase, while port hopping-a technique allowing instrument switching by the surgeon-was introduced as an alternative. No conversions to thoracotomy or blood transfusions occurred throughout the study period. These findings suggest that, with appropriate strategies and technical adaptations, solo-surgery in RATS is not only feasible but can be performed safely without compromising operative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17841,"journal":{"name":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","volume":"79 4","pages":"243-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted thoracic surgery( RATS), the role of surgical assistants has evolved compared to traditional open or video-assisted thoracic surgery( VATS). At our institution, a 5-port look-up view approach with the da Vinci Xi system has been in use since May 2021, and since June 2024, we have transitioned to a solo-surgery approach in which the primary surgeon independently manages both console operation and surgical field exposure. In this retrospective single-center study, we quantitatively evaluated assistant interventions in 115 cases during the introduction phase and 45 cases during the solo-surgery phase. Assistant interventions such as suctioning and retraction significantly decreased in the solo-surgery phase, while port hopping-a technique allowing instrument switching by the surgeon-was introduced as an alternative. No conversions to thoracotomy or blood transfusions occurred throughout the study period. These findings suggest that, with appropriate strategies and technical adaptations, solo-surgery in RATS is not only feasible but can be performed safely without compromising operative outcomes.

[机器人辅助肺切除术辅助干预的定量评价及单独手术的可行性]。
随着机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)的日益普及,与传统的开放或视频辅助胸外科手术(VATS)相比,手术助手的角色已经发生了变化。在我们的机构,自2021年5月以来一直使用带有达芬奇Xi系统的5端口查找视图入路,自2024年6月以来,我们已经过渡到单独手术入路,其中主要外科医生独立管理控制台操作和手术野暴露。在这项回顾性的单中心研究中,我们定量评估了115例在引入阶段和45例在单独手术阶段的辅助干预措施。在单独手术阶段,辅助干预措施(如吸引和牵回)显著减少,而port hopper(一种允许外科医生切换器械的技术)被作为替代方案引入。在整个研究期间没有发生转开胸或输血的情况。这些发现表明,通过适当的策略和技术调整,大鼠的单独手术不仅是可行的,而且可以在不影响手术结果的情况下安全进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
213
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书