Parent and audiologist perspectives on personalised hearing loss simulations: implications for counselling and children's hearing aid use.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jacqueline Young, Harriet Withey, Steven Bell, Annabel Thomas, Sian Lickess, Abby Milchard
{"title":"Parent and audiologist perspectives on personalised hearing loss simulations: implications for counselling and children's hearing aid use.","authors":"Jacqueline Young, Harriet Withey, Steven Bell, Annabel Thomas, Sian Lickess, Abby Milchard","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2026.2727788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore parent and audiologist perspectives on personalised hearing loss simulations in paediatric audiology, and to assess the impact of simulations on data-logged hearing aid use in children under 11.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods retrospective review of anonymised clinical records following the introduction of a hearing loss simulator into standard care. Data included child age and hearing level, hearing aid datalogging, parents' responses to the simulations and questionnaires completed by audiologists.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>85 records were reviewed. Datalogging was available for 52 children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most parents opted to hear the simulation (94%), and nearly all found it helpful (97%), irrespective of their child's hearing level. The simulation offered parents insight beyond previous descriptors, modifying their understanding of their child's experience. It prompted conversations about emotions, behaviour, and hearing aid use. Audiologists felt simulations were helpful for parents but could lead to challenging conversations. Children's hours of hearing aid use did not change significantly after their parents heard the simulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents say that a personalised simulation of their child's hearing is helpful. The simulation is an effective counselling tool, acceptable to both parents and audiologists. However, sharing a simulation, did not increase daily hearing aid use in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2026.2727788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore parent and audiologist perspectives on personalised hearing loss simulations in paediatric audiology, and to assess the impact of simulations on data-logged hearing aid use in children under 11.

Design: A mixed-methods retrospective review of anonymised clinical records following the introduction of a hearing loss simulator into standard care. Data included child age and hearing level, hearing aid datalogging, parents' responses to the simulations and questionnaires completed by audiologists.

Study sample: 85 records were reviewed. Datalogging was available for 52 children.

Results: Most parents opted to hear the simulation (94%), and nearly all found it helpful (97%), irrespective of their child's hearing level. The simulation offered parents insight beyond previous descriptors, modifying their understanding of their child's experience. It prompted conversations about emotions, behaviour, and hearing aid use. Audiologists felt simulations were helpful for parents but could lead to challenging conversations. Children's hours of hearing aid use did not change significantly after their parents heard the simulation.

Conclusions: Parents say that a personalised simulation of their child's hearing is helpful. The simulation is an effective counselling tool, acceptable to both parents and audiologists. However, sharing a simulation, did not increase daily hearing aid use in children.

家长和听力学家对个性化听力损失模拟的看法:对咨询和儿童助听器使用的影响。
目的:探讨儿童听力学中个性化听力损失模拟的家长和听力学家观点,并评估模拟对11岁以下儿童助听器使用数据记录的影响。设计:在标准护理中引入听力损失模拟器后,对匿名临床记录进行混合方法回顾性评价。数据包括儿童年龄和听力水平,助听器数据记录,家长对模拟的反应以及听力学家完成的问卷。研究样本:85份记录。对52名儿童进行了数据记录。结果:无论孩子的听力水平如何,大多数家长(94%)选择听模拟听力,几乎所有家长(97%)都认为模拟听力有帮助。这个模拟为父母提供了超越先前描述的洞察力,改变了他们对孩子经历的理解。它引发了关于情绪、行为和助听器使用的对话。听力学家认为模拟对父母有帮助,但可能会导致具有挑战性的对话。在父母听到模拟后,儿童使用助听器的时间没有明显变化。结论:家长们说对孩子的听力进行个性化模拟是有帮助的。这种模拟是一种有效的咨询工具,父母和听力学家都能接受。然而,共享模拟并没有增加儿童的日常助听器使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书