False-Positive Troponins: Clinical Misclassification, Delayed Recognition, and Health Care Costs in a Real-World Cohort.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lung En Teng, Preetha Thomas, Edward Quine, Jacqueline Liaw, Amelia Place, Joel Smith, Andrew J Taylor, Timothy Fazio, Cherie Chiang, Anoop N Koshy
{"title":"False-Positive Troponins: Clinical Misclassification, Delayed Recognition, and Health Care Costs in a Real-World Cohort.","authors":"Lung En Teng, Preetha Thomas, Edward Quine, Jacqueline Liaw, Amelia Place, Joel Smith, Andrew J Taylor, Timothy Fazio, Cherie Chiang, Anoop N Koshy","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2026.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac troponin immunoassays are critical for diagnosing myocardial infarction. Up to 10% of elevated results may be falsely positive because of heterophile antibodies or macrotroponin complexes, leading to misdiagnoses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia (January 2021-December 2024). The Abbott high-sensitivity troponin-I assay was the primary assay used in standard practice. Interference was confirmed according to institutional protocol when alternative assays (Ortho Vitros or Roche high-sensitivity assays) performed on the same plasma sample were negative. Clinical characteristics, investigations, treatment, documentation, and health care costs were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 148,987 high-sensitivity troponin-I requests, 38 patients underwent alternate testing. In the 26 patients with confirmed interference, the median age was 48 years (interquartile range 36-60), with equal sex distribution; 39% had no cardiovascular risk factors. The median troponin levels were 150 ng/L. All underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and 73% received coronary imaging (computed tomography or invasive angiography). More than half had normal cardiac findings. Misdiagnoses included myocarditis (35%) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (23%); 81% received treatment changes, including colchicine, aspirin, or anticoagulation. The median delay to recognition was 7.5 months. Documentation was inconsistent: only 54% had interference recorded in the medical record and 19% in discharge summaries. Estimated costs averaged AUD $16,331 per patient, largely because of avoidable admissions and procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Troponin assay interference is an under-recognised source of false-positive troponin elevations, leading to diagnostic error, unnecessary testing, and substantial health care costs. Prompt recognition, consistent documentation, and routine confirmatory testing using alternate assays are essential to mitigate clinical and economic consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2026.05.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac troponin immunoassays are critical for diagnosing myocardial infarction. Up to 10% of elevated results may be falsely positive because of heterophile antibodies or macrotroponin complexes, leading to misdiagnoses.

Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia (January 2021-December 2024). The Abbott high-sensitivity troponin-I assay was the primary assay used in standard practice. Interference was confirmed according to institutional protocol when alternative assays (Ortho Vitros or Roche high-sensitivity assays) performed on the same plasma sample were negative. Clinical characteristics, investigations, treatment, documentation, and health care costs were reviewed.

Results: Among 148,987 high-sensitivity troponin-I requests, 38 patients underwent alternate testing. In the 26 patients with confirmed interference, the median age was 48 years (interquartile range 36-60), with equal sex distribution; 39% had no cardiovascular risk factors. The median troponin levels were 150 ng/L. All underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and 73% received coronary imaging (computed tomography or invasive angiography). More than half had normal cardiac findings. Misdiagnoses included myocarditis (35%) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (23%); 81% received treatment changes, including colchicine, aspirin, or anticoagulation. The median delay to recognition was 7.5 months. Documentation was inconsistent: only 54% had interference recorded in the medical record and 19% in discharge summaries. Estimated costs averaged AUD $16,331 per patient, largely because of avoidable admissions and procedures.

Conclusions: Troponin assay interference is an under-recognised source of false-positive troponin elevations, leading to diagnostic error, unnecessary testing, and substantial health care costs. Prompt recognition, consistent documentation, and routine confirmatory testing using alternate assays are essential to mitigate clinical and economic consequences.

假阳性肌钙蛋白:临床误分类、延迟识别和现实世界队列中的医疗费用。
背景:心肌肌钙蛋白免疫检测是诊断心肌梗死的关键。由于嗜异性抗体或大肌钙蛋白复合物,高达10%的升高结果可能是假阳性,导致误诊。方法:我们在澳大利亚皇家墨尔本医院(2021年1月- 2024年12月)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。雅培高灵敏度肌钙蛋白- 1检测是标准实践中使用的主要检测方法。当对同一血浆样品进行替代测定(Ortho Vitros或Roche高灵敏度测定)时,根据机构方案确认干扰为阴性。回顾了临床特征、调查、治疗、文件和医疗保健费用。结果:在148,987例高灵敏度肌钙蛋白- 1请求中,38例患者接受了替代检测。26例确诊干扰患者中,年龄中位数为48岁(四分位数范围36 ~ 60),性别分布均匀;39%没有心血管危险因素。肌钙蛋白中位数为150 ng/L。所有患者都接受了经胸超声心动图检查,73%的患者接受了冠状动脉成像(计算机断层扫描或侵入性血管造影)。超过一半的人心脏检查结果正常。误诊包括心肌炎(35%)和非st段抬高型心肌梗死(23%);81%接受了治疗改变,包括秋水仙碱、阿司匹林或抗凝。到识别的中位延迟为7.5个月。文件不一致:只有54%的人在医疗记录中记录了干扰,19%的人在出院摘要中记录了干扰。估计每位患者的平均费用为16,331澳元,主要是因为可以避免的住院和手术。结论:肌钙蛋白检测干扰是肌钙蛋白假阳性升高的一个未被充分认识的来源,导致诊断错误、不必要的检测和大量的医疗费用。及时识别、一致的文件记录和使用替代测定法进行常规确认检测对于减轻临床和经济后果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书