Cue-specific sexual avoidance, metacognitive beliefs, and sexual functioning in women with lifelong vaginismus: a cross-sectional case-control study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gülin Özdamar Ünal, Sinay Önen, Memduha Aydın
{"title":"Cue-specific sexual avoidance, metacognitive beliefs, and sexual functioning in women with lifelong vaginismus: a cross-sectional case-control study.","authors":"Gülin Özdamar Ünal, Sinay Önen, Memduha Aydın","doi":"10.1186/s12905-026-04761-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Avoidance is a key maintaining factor in lifelong vaginismus and may extend beyond penetration attempts to broader sexual cues. Metacognitive beliefs, particularly beliefs about the usefulness of worry and the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts, may shape threat appraisal and coping responses in sexual contexts. We characterized clinician-elicited sex-related avoidance behaviors in lifelong vaginismus and examined how avoidance and metacognitive beliefs relate to sexual functioning beyond anxiety and depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional case-control study was conducted in three outpatient clinics in Türkiye. Participants were 64 women evaluated for lifelong vaginismus and 30 controls. Sex-related avoidance over the past 6 months was assessed using five standardized yes/no clinician-elicited items; endorsing ≥ 1 item defined the avoidant subgroup. Participants completed ASEX (Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale), GRISS (Golombok-Rust Sexual Satisfaction Scale), MCQ-30 (Metacognitions Questionnaire-30), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Between-group comparisons examined sexual outcomes and metacognitive beliefs across groups, and hierarchical regression models examined whether MCQ-30 subscales accounted for additional variance in ASEX and GRISS scores beyond BDI and BAI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty of 64 women with vaginismus (46.9%) were classified as avoidant. The avoidant subgroup showed poorer ASEX and GRISS scores than the non-avoidant subgroup and controls (all adjusted pairwise p < 0.05). Women with vaginismus showed greater endorsement of dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs than controls. However, the avoidant and non-avoidant vaginismus subgroups did not differ on MCQ-30 indices. In logistic regression, adding three theoretically selected MCQ-30 subscales did not significantly improve model fit beyond BDI and BAI (Δχ²(3) = 3.84, p = 0.279). Adding MCQ-30 subscales accounted for an additional 19% of variance in ASEX-total scores (R²=0.13 to 0.32) and an additional 21% of variance in GRISS-total scores (R²=0.05 to 0.26). Negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger showed the strongest associations with higher ASEX-total (β = 0.52, p = 0.004) and GRISS-total (β = 0.58, p = 0.002) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex-related cue avoidance beyond penetration attempts was endorsed by nearly half of women with lifelong vaginismus and marks poorer sexual functioning. Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs-particularly beliefs about uncontrollability and danger-relate to sexual impairment beyond anxiety and depressive symptoms, supporting brief screening for avoided cues and metacognitive targets in clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04761-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Avoidance is a key maintaining factor in lifelong vaginismus and may extend beyond penetration attempts to broader sexual cues. Metacognitive beliefs, particularly beliefs about the usefulness of worry and the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts, may shape threat appraisal and coping responses in sexual contexts. We characterized clinician-elicited sex-related avoidance behaviors in lifelong vaginismus and examined how avoidance and metacognitive beliefs relate to sexual functioning beyond anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Methods: This cross-sectional case-control study was conducted in three outpatient clinics in Türkiye. Participants were 64 women evaluated for lifelong vaginismus and 30 controls. Sex-related avoidance over the past 6 months was assessed using five standardized yes/no clinician-elicited items; endorsing ≥ 1 item defined the avoidant subgroup. Participants completed ASEX (Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale), GRISS (Golombok-Rust Sexual Satisfaction Scale), MCQ-30 (Metacognitions Questionnaire-30), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Between-group comparisons examined sexual outcomes and metacognitive beliefs across groups, and hierarchical regression models examined whether MCQ-30 subscales accounted for additional variance in ASEX and GRISS scores beyond BDI and BAI.

Results: Thirty of 64 women with vaginismus (46.9%) were classified as avoidant. The avoidant subgroup showed poorer ASEX and GRISS scores than the non-avoidant subgroup and controls (all adjusted pairwise p < 0.05). Women with vaginismus showed greater endorsement of dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs than controls. However, the avoidant and non-avoidant vaginismus subgroups did not differ on MCQ-30 indices. In logistic regression, adding three theoretically selected MCQ-30 subscales did not significantly improve model fit beyond BDI and BAI (Δχ²(3) = 3.84, p = 0.279). Adding MCQ-30 subscales accounted for an additional 19% of variance in ASEX-total scores (R²=0.13 to 0.32) and an additional 21% of variance in GRISS-total scores (R²=0.05 to 0.26). Negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger showed the strongest associations with higher ASEX-total (β = 0.52, p = 0.004) and GRISS-total (β = 0.58, p = 0.002) scores.

Conclusions: Sex-related cue avoidance beyond penetration attempts was endorsed by nearly half of women with lifelong vaginismus and marks poorer sexual functioning. Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs-particularly beliefs about uncontrollability and danger-relate to sexual impairment beyond anxiety and depressive symptoms, supporting brief screening for avoided cues and metacognitive targets in clinical assessment.

提示特异性性回避,元认知信念和终身阴道痉挛女性的性功能:一项横断面病例对照研究
背景:逃避是终身阴道痉挛的关键维持因素,并且可能延伸到更广泛的性暗示。元认知信念,特别是关于担忧的有用性、思想的不可控性和危险性的信念,可能会影响对性环境中的威胁评估和应对反应。我们描述了终身阴道痉挛患者临床诱发的性相关回避行为,并研究了回避和元认知信念如何与焦虑和抑郁症状之外的性功能相关。方法:本横断面病例对照研究在基耶省的三个门诊进行。参与者包括64名终身阴道痉挛的女性和30名对照组。使用5个标准化的“是”/“否”临床诱发项目评估过去6个月的性回避行为;认可≥1项定义逃避亚组。参与者完成ASEX(亚利桑那性经验量表)、GRISS (Golombok-Rust性满意度量表)、MCQ-30(元认知问卷-30)、Beck抑郁量表(BDI)和Beck焦虑量表(BAI)。组间比较检查了组间的性结局和元认知信念,分层回归模型检查了MCQ-30子量表是否在BDI和BAI之外解释了ASEX和GRISS评分的额外方差。结果:64例阴道痉挛患者中30例为回避型,占46.9%。与非回避亚组和对照组相比,回避亚组的ASEX和GRISS得分较低(均为两两调整)。结论:近一半的终身阴道挛患者认同除插入尝试之外的性相关提示回避,并且性功能较差。功能失调的元认知信念——特别是关于不可控性和危险性的信念——与焦虑和抑郁症状之外的性障碍有关,支持在临床评估中对避免的线索和元认知目标进行简短筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书