Advantages of a Two-Stage Randomized Trial Design to Evaluate Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies: a Simulation Study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Juan Gago, Christopher Boyer, Marc Lipsitch
{"title":"Advantages of a Two-Stage Randomized Trial Design to Evaluate Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies: a Simulation Study.","authors":"Juan Gago, Christopher Boyer, Marc Lipsitch","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial prescribing policies affect treated patients and, through altered transmission, their contacts. Two-stage randomized (2SR) designs can estimate these spillover effects but have not been applied to antimicrobial strategies. We built a stochastic agent-based model of a hospital ward with two competing strains (susceptible and resistant) to emulate a 2SR trial. Drug A covers only the susceptible strain, while Drug B covers both. Six clusters were randomized to a 90/10 or 50/50 Drug A/Drug B allocation, with individuals randomized to treatments within clusters. We estimated direct, indirect, total, and overall effects on mortality. Drug A recipients had higher mortality than Drug B recipients in every cluster, because Drug A does not cover the resistant strain (direct effect +4.75 to +7.08 percentage points [pp]). Among Drug A recipients, mortality was higher when the ward followed 90/10 than 50/50 (indirect effect +2.10 pp), driven by higher resistant-strain prevalence; the effect on Drug B recipients was minimal. The 50/50 strategy reduced total mortality (overall effect -4.00 pp), but this concealed a redistribution: resistant-strain deaths fell while susceptible-strain deaths rose. Findings were robust across sensitivity scenarios. The 2SR design captures spillover effects invisible to individually randomized trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial prescribing policies affect treated patients and, through altered transmission, their contacts. Two-stage randomized (2SR) designs can estimate these spillover effects but have not been applied to antimicrobial strategies. We built a stochastic agent-based model of a hospital ward with two competing strains (susceptible and resistant) to emulate a 2SR trial. Drug A covers only the susceptible strain, while Drug B covers both. Six clusters were randomized to a 90/10 or 50/50 Drug A/Drug B allocation, with individuals randomized to treatments within clusters. We estimated direct, indirect, total, and overall effects on mortality. Drug A recipients had higher mortality than Drug B recipients in every cluster, because Drug A does not cover the resistant strain (direct effect +4.75 to +7.08 percentage points [pp]). Among Drug A recipients, mortality was higher when the ward followed 90/10 than 50/50 (indirect effect +2.10 pp), driven by higher resistant-strain prevalence; the effect on Drug B recipients was minimal. The 50/50 strategy reduced total mortality (overall effect -4.00 pp), but this concealed a redistribution: resistant-strain deaths fell while susceptible-strain deaths rose. Findings were robust across sensitivity scenarios. The 2SR design captures spillover effects invisible to individually randomized trials.

两阶段随机试验设计评估抗菌治疗策略的优势:一项模拟研究。
抗微生物药物处方政策影响治疗患者,并通过改变传播影响其接触者。两阶段随机(2SR)设计可以估计这些溢出效应,但尚未应用于抗菌策略。我们建立了一个基于随机主体的医院病房模型,其中有两种相互竞争的菌株(易感和耐药)来模拟2SR试验。药物A只覆盖易感菌株,而药物B覆盖两种菌株。六个组随机分配到90/10或50/50药物a /药物B分配,个体随机分配到组内的治疗。我们估计了对死亡率的直接、间接、总和总体影响。由于药物A不包括耐药菌株,每个群集中药物A接受者的死亡率高于药物B接受者(直接效应+4.75 ~ +7.08个百分点)。在A类药物接受者中,由于耐药菌株流行率较高,当病房遵循90/10时死亡率高于50/50(间接效应+2.10 pp);对B类药物接受者的影响微乎其微。50/50策略降低了总死亡率(总体效果-4.00人),但这掩盖了一个再分配:耐药菌株死亡率下降,而易感菌株死亡率上升。研究结果在不同的敏感性情景下都是稳健的。2SR设计捕获了个别随机试验不可见的溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书