{"title":"Physics-constrained Neural ODE compact modeling of multi-terminal MoS2 memtransistors for LTspice neuromorphic circuit simulation","authors":"Sumit Vyas","doi":"10.1007/s10825-026-02635-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compact models are required to connect multi-terminal molybdenum disulfide (MoS<sub>2</sub>) memtransistors with standard circuit simulators, but only a limited number of such models are available. In this work, a physics-constrained neural ordinary differential equation (Neural ODE) compact model was developed and implemented as an LTspice behavioral subcircuit, in which the internal switching dynamics were learned from a reduced-order teacher. A Biolek-type directional window was combined with the exact hard-zero expression <span>\\({n}_{\\theta }\\left(w,{V}_{DS}\\right)-{n}_{\\theta }\\left(w,0\\right)\\)</span>, due to which the state rate becomes exactly zero at zero drain–source voltage. The mean in-range coefficient of determination obtained for five seeds was <span>\\({R}^{2}=0.999874\\pm 0.000055\\)</span>. For the selected model, the out-of-range <span>\\({R}^{2}\\)</span> values at <span>\\(\\pm 9\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\pm 11\\)</span> V were 0.8506 and 0.7586, respectively, as compared to 0.6511 and 0.3595 for the fitted linear Biolek model. The hysteresis-area error was 34.03% for the learned model, as compared to 40.23% for the fitted linear model, whereas the linear model showed smaller low-conductance-state and pulse-nonlinearity errors. The normalized comparison with published MoS<sub>2</sub> memtransistor data showed good agreement for potentiation (<span>\\({R}^{2}=0.9755\\)</span>), whereas the agreement for depression curvature was weak (<span>\\({R}^{2}=0.2738\\)</span>). The state and current <span>\\({R}^{2}\\)</span> values obtained from the exported LTspice data both exceeded 0.999999, i.e., agreement at numerical precision. The results show that the model can be used as a circuit-compatible emulator within the investigated conditions, but it is not a replacement for calibration with measured device data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Electronics","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10825-026-02635-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Compact models are required to connect multi-terminal molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) memtransistors with standard circuit simulators, but only a limited number of such models are available. In this work, a physics-constrained neural ordinary differential equation (Neural ODE) compact model was developed and implemented as an LTspice behavioral subcircuit, in which the internal switching dynamics were learned from a reduced-order teacher. A Biolek-type directional window was combined with the exact hard-zero expression \({n}_{\theta }\left(w,{V}_{DS}\right)-{n}_{\theta }\left(w,0\right)\), due to which the state rate becomes exactly zero at zero drain–source voltage. The mean in-range coefficient of determination obtained for five seeds was \({R}^{2}=0.999874\pm 0.000055\). For the selected model, the out-of-range \({R}^{2}\) values at \(\pm 9\) and \(\pm 11\) V were 0.8506 and 0.7586, respectively, as compared to 0.6511 and 0.3595 for the fitted linear Biolek model. The hysteresis-area error was 34.03% for the learned model, as compared to 40.23% for the fitted linear model, whereas the linear model showed smaller low-conductance-state and pulse-nonlinearity errors. The normalized comparison with published MoS2 memtransistor data showed good agreement for potentiation (\({R}^{2}=0.9755\)), whereas the agreement for depression curvature was weak (\({R}^{2}=0.2738\)). The state and current \({R}^{2}\) values obtained from the exported LTspice data both exceeded 0.999999, i.e., agreement at numerical precision. The results show that the model can be used as a circuit-compatible emulator within the investigated conditions, but it is not a replacement for calibration with measured device data.
紧凑的模型需要连接多终端二硫化钼(MoS2) mem晶体管与标准电路模拟器,但只有有限数量的这种模型是可用的。在这项工作中,开发了一个物理约束的神经常微分方程(neural ODE)紧凑模型,并将其实现为LTspice行为子电路,其中内部切换动力学从降阶教师那里学习。biolek型定向窗口与精确的硬零表达式\({n}_{\theta }\left(w,{V}_{DS}\right)-{n}_{\theta }\left(w,0\right)\)相结合,因此在漏源极电压为零时,状态速率变为精确的零。5种种子的平均定程系数为\({R}^{2}=0.999874\pm 0.000055\)。对于所选模型,\(\pm 9\)和\(\pm 11\) V处的超范围\({R}^{2}\)值分别为0.8506和0.7586,而拟合的线性Biolek模型的超范围值分别为0.6511和0.3595。滞后面积误差为34.03% for the learned model, as compared to 40.23% for the fitted linear model, whereas the linear model showed smaller low-conductance-state and pulse-nonlinearity errors. The normalized comparison with published MoS2 memtransistor data showed good agreement for potentiation (\({R}^{2}=0.9755\)), whereas the agreement for depression curvature was weak (\({R}^{2}=0.2738\)). The state and current \({R}^{2}\) values obtained from the exported LTspice data both exceeded 0.999999, i.e., agreement at numerical precision. The results show that the model can be used as a circuit-compatible emulator within the investigated conditions, but it is not a replacement for calibration with measured device data.
期刊介绍:
he Journal of Computational Electronics brings together research on all aspects of modeling and simulation of modern electronics. This includes optical, electronic, mechanical, and quantum mechanical aspects, as well as research on the underlying mathematical algorithms and computational details. The related areas of energy conversion/storage and of molecular and biological systems, in which the thrust is on the charge transport, electronic, mechanical, and optical properties, are also covered.
In particular, we encourage manuscripts dealing with device simulation; with optical and optoelectronic systems and photonics; with energy storage (e.g. batteries, fuel cells) and harvesting (e.g. photovoltaic), with simulation of circuits, VLSI layout, logic and architecture (based on, for example, CMOS devices, quantum-cellular automata, QBITs, or single-electron transistors); with electromagnetic simulations (such as microwave electronics and components); or with molecular and biological systems. However, in all these cases, the submitted manuscripts should explicitly address the electronic properties of the relevant systems, materials, or devices and/or present novel contributions to the physical models, computational strategies, or numerical algorithms.