Role of fermented and unfermented rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in wet and dry marinades on oxidative status and sensory properties of pork meat subjected to different cooking methods

IF 4.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Marco Morosetti, Sara Barbarossa, Dalene De Beer, Benedetta Fanesi, Lama Ismaiel, Paolo Lucci, Luca Tiano, Andrea Frontini, Elisabetta Damiani, Patrick Orlando
{"title":"Role of fermented and unfermented rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in wet and dry marinades on oxidative status and sensory properties of pork meat subjected to different cooking methods","authors":"Marco Morosetti,&nbsp;Sara Barbarossa,&nbsp;Dalene De Beer,&nbsp;Benedetta Fanesi,&nbsp;Lama Ismaiel,&nbsp;Paolo Lucci,&nbsp;Luca Tiano,&nbsp;Andrea Frontini,&nbsp;Elisabetta Damiani,&nbsp;Patrick Orlando","doi":"10.1007/s00217-026-05279-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The antioxidant potential of <i>Aspalathus linearis</i> (rooibos), either fermented (FR) or unfermented (UR), used as a natural additive in dry or wet marinades for pork loin cooked using oven, pan, sous-vide and microwave methods was investigated. Their effect on lipid peroxidation (LP), on the content and oxidative status of coenzyme Q<sub>10</sub> (CoQ<sub>10</sub>), on cooking-related meat weight loss and on sensorial properties were evaluated. All cooking methods increased LP endpoints, however pan-cooking lead to lower oxidation in terms of hydroperoxides (PV) (0.020 ± 0.003 mEq O₂/100 g in wet-marinated and 0.025 ± 0.000 mEq O₂/100 g in dry-marinated meat) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (0.124 ± 0.015 mg/100 g in wet-marinated and 0.163 ± 0.002 mg/100 g in dry-marinated meat). FR limited the increase in PV in dry-marinated samples cooked using oven (0.031 ± 0.007 mEq O₂/100 g), sous-vide (0.023 ± 0.007 mEq O₂/100 g) and microwave (0.260 ± 0.006 mEq O₂/100 g), compared to the control (C) (oven = 0.045 ± 0.004 mEq O₂/100 g sous-vide = 0.042 ± 0.003 mEq O₂/100 g, microwave = 0.046 ± 0.005 mEq O₂/100 g). For MDA levels, FR was effective in dry marinated and microwaved samples (C = 0.265 ± 0.061 mg/100 g, FR = 0.106 ± 0.026 mg/100 g) and in oven-cooked samples previously wet-marinated (C = 0.211 ± 0.022 mg/100 g, FR = 0.128 ± 0.005 mg/100 g) or dry-marinated (C = 0.247 ± 0.019 mg/100 g; FR = 0.159 ± 0.005 mg/100 g). Conversely, UR was able to significantly counteract both PV and MDA in oven, sous-vide and microwave cooked meat, regardless of the marinating technique used, proving even more effective in counteracting LP. On the other hand, FR seems to provide a more favourable sensory profile, particularly in samples cooked in the microwave with a wet marinade and in samples cooked in the oven with a dry marinade. The use of rooibos influenced CoQ<sub>10</sub> oxidative status under certain conditions. This study demonstrates the ability of rooibos extracts to modulate early oxidative changes occurring during meat cooking, indicating its potential use as a natural alternative to synthetic preservatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":549,"journal":{"name":"European Food Research and Technology","volume":"252 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-026-05279-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Food Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-026-05279-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antioxidant potential of Aspalathus linearis (rooibos), either fermented (FR) or unfermented (UR), used as a natural additive in dry or wet marinades for pork loin cooked using oven, pan, sous-vide and microwave methods was investigated. Their effect on lipid peroxidation (LP), on the content and oxidative status of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), on cooking-related meat weight loss and on sensorial properties were evaluated. All cooking methods increased LP endpoints, however pan-cooking lead to lower oxidation in terms of hydroperoxides (PV) (0.020 ± 0.003 mEq O₂/100 g in wet-marinated and 0.025 ± 0.000 mEq O₂/100 g in dry-marinated meat) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (0.124 ± 0.015 mg/100 g in wet-marinated and 0.163 ± 0.002 mg/100 g in dry-marinated meat). FR limited the increase in PV in dry-marinated samples cooked using oven (0.031 ± 0.007 mEq O₂/100 g), sous-vide (0.023 ± 0.007 mEq O₂/100 g) and microwave (0.260 ± 0.006 mEq O₂/100 g), compared to the control (C) (oven = 0.045 ± 0.004 mEq O₂/100 g sous-vide = 0.042 ± 0.003 mEq O₂/100 g, microwave = 0.046 ± 0.005 mEq O₂/100 g). For MDA levels, FR was effective in dry marinated and microwaved samples (C = 0.265 ± 0.061 mg/100 g, FR = 0.106 ± 0.026 mg/100 g) and in oven-cooked samples previously wet-marinated (C = 0.211 ± 0.022 mg/100 g, FR = 0.128 ± 0.005 mg/100 g) or dry-marinated (C = 0.247 ± 0.019 mg/100 g; FR = 0.159 ± 0.005 mg/100 g). Conversely, UR was able to significantly counteract both PV and MDA in oven, sous-vide and microwave cooked meat, regardless of the marinating technique used, proving even more effective in counteracting LP. On the other hand, FR seems to provide a more favourable sensory profile, particularly in samples cooked in the microwave with a wet marinade and in samples cooked in the oven with a dry marinade. The use of rooibos influenced CoQ10 oxidative status under certain conditions. This study demonstrates the ability of rooibos extracts to modulate early oxidative changes occurring during meat cooking, indicating its potential use as a natural alternative to synthetic preservatives.

湿腌和干腌中发酵和未发酵路易波士对不同烹调方法下猪肉氧化状态和感官特性的影响
以发酵和未发酵的芦笋为原料,研究了其作为天然添加剂在烤炉、平底锅、真空烹调和微波烹制猪里脊肉的干腌料和湿腌料中的抗氧化作用。研究了它们对脂质过氧化(LP)、辅酶Q10 (CoQ10)含量和氧化状态的影响,以及对烹饪相关肉类减重和感官特性的影响。所有的烹饪方法都增加了LP的终点,但是平底锅烹饪导致氢过氧化物(PV)(湿腌肉为0.020±0.003 mEq O₂/100 g,干腌肉为0.025±0.000 mEq O₂/100 g)和丙二醛(MDA)(湿腌肉为0.124±0.015 mg/100 g,干腌肉为0.163±0.002 mg/100 g)的氧化降低。与对照组(烤箱= 0.045±0.004 mEq O₂/100 g,真空烹调= 0.042±0.003 mEq O₂/100 g,微波烹调= 0.046±0.005 mEq O₂/100 g)相比,FR限制了用烤箱(0.031±0.007 mEq O₂/100 g)、真空烹调(0.023±0.007 mEq O₂/100 g)和微波烹调(0.260±0.006 mEq O₂/100 g)的干腌样品的PV增加。对于MDA水平,FR对干腌和微波样品(C = 0.265±0.061 mg/100 g, FR = 0.106±0.026 mg/100 g)和湿腌的烤箱样品(C = 0.211±0.022 mg/100 g, FR = 0.128±0.005 mg/100 g)或干腌样品(C = 0.247±0.019 mg/100 g, FR = 0.159±0.005 mg/100 g)有效。相反,无论采用何种腌制技术,UR都能在烤箱、真空烹调和微波烹调的肉类中显著抵消PV和MDA,证明其在抵消LP方面更有效。另一方面,FR似乎提供了更有利的感官特征,特别是在用湿腌料在微波炉中烹饪的样品和用干腌料在烤箱中烹饪的样品中。在一定条件下,路易波士的使用会影响辅酶q10的氧化状态。这项研究证明了路易波士提取物调节肉类烹饪过程中发生的早期氧化变化的能力,表明其作为合成防腐剂的天然替代品的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Food Research and Technology
European Food Research and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
232
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal European Food Research and Technology publishes state-of-the-art research papers and review articles on fundamental and applied food research. The journal''s mission is the fast publication of high quality papers on front-line research, newest techniques and on developing trends in the following sections: -chemistry and biochemistry- technology and molecular biotechnology- nutritional chemistry and toxicology- analytical and sensory methodologies- food physics. Out of the scope of the journal are: - contributions which are not of international interest or do not have a substantial impact on food sciences, - submissions which comprise merely data collections, based on the use of routine analytical or bacteriological methods, - contributions reporting biological or functional effects without profound chemical and/or physical structure characterization of the compound(s) under research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书