Characteristics of the Haptic Position and Its Impact on Vault After Horizontal or Vertical ICL Implantation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Chiwen Cheng, Yichen Xiao, Ruoyan Wei, Rui Xiong, Lanhui Yu, Xiaoying Wang, Xingtao Zhou, Shengtao Liu
{"title":"Characteristics of the Haptic Position and Its Impact on Vault After Horizontal or Vertical ICL Implantation.","authors":"Chiwen Cheng, Yichen Xiao, Ruoyan Wei, Rui Xiong, Lanhui Yu, Xiaoying Wang, Xingtao Zhou, Shengtao Liu","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20260708-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the haptic positioning and its impact on postoperative vault after horizontal versus vertical Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty eyes (80 patients) undergoing ICL V4c (STAAR Surgical) implantation were stratified into horizontal (n = 40) and vertical (n = 40) groups. Ultrasound biomicroscopy measured ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus, crystalline lens to ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus, central vault (C-Vault), peripheral vault, and categorized haptic positions relative to ciliary anatomy (supratemporal, inferotemporal, supranasal, inferonasal). Statistical analyses compared intergroup differences and associations between parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Haptic distribution in the horizontal group varied by quadrant: 42.6% of haptics were in the ciliary sulcus (vs 40.8% vertical, <i>P</i> = .601), 29.4% of haptics were under the ciliary process (vs 23.7% vertical, <i>P</i> = .797), 21.8% of haptics were on the anterior angle of the ciliary process (vs 24.9% vertical, <i>P</i> = .302), and 6.1% of haptics were inserted into the ciliary process (vs 10.6% vertical, <i>P</i> = .023). The final tip of the ICL haptic negatively correlated with C-Vault in the horizontal (<i>P</i> = .009) and vertical (<i>P</i> = .049) groups, but showed no significant correlation with peripheral vault.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant differences in haptic distribution patterns were observed between the horizontal and vertical implantation groups, whereas haptic position demonstrated significant correlations with central vault.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"42 9","pages":"e887-e894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20260708-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the haptic positioning and its impact on postoperative vault after horizontal versus vertical Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.

Methods: Eighty eyes (80 patients) undergoing ICL V4c (STAAR Surgical) implantation were stratified into horizontal (n = 40) and vertical (n = 40) groups. Ultrasound biomicroscopy measured ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus, crystalline lens to ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus, central vault (C-Vault), peripheral vault, and categorized haptic positions relative to ciliary anatomy (supratemporal, inferotemporal, supranasal, inferonasal). Statistical analyses compared intergroup differences and associations between parameters.

Results: Haptic distribution in the horizontal group varied by quadrant: 42.6% of haptics were in the ciliary sulcus (vs 40.8% vertical, P = .601), 29.4% of haptics were under the ciliary process (vs 23.7% vertical, P = .797), 21.8% of haptics were on the anterior angle of the ciliary process (vs 24.9% vertical, P = .302), and 6.1% of haptics were inserted into the ciliary process (vs 10.6% vertical, P = .023). The final tip of the ICL haptic negatively correlated with C-Vault in the horizontal (P = .009) and vertical (P = .049) groups, but showed no significant correlation with peripheral vault.

Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in haptic distribution patterns were observed between the horizontal and vertical implantation groups, whereas haptic position demonstrated significant correlations with central vault.

水平或垂直ICL植入术后触觉位置的特点及其对穹窿的影响。
目的:探讨水平与垂直人工晶体植入术后角膜触觉定位对角膜拱顶的影响。方法:80只眼(80例)行ICL V4c (STAAR Surgical)植入术,分为水平组(n = 40)和垂直组(n = 40)。超声生物显微镜测量睫状体沟到睫状体沟到睫状体沟、晶状体到睫状体沟到睫状体沟、中央穹窿(c穹窿)、外周穹窿,并根据睫状体解剖(颞上、颞下、鼻上、鼻下)对触觉位置进行分类。统计分析比较了组间差异和参数之间的关联。结果:水平组触觉分布各象限不同:42.6%的触觉位于睫状沟(垂直比40.8%,P = 0.601), 29.4%的触觉位于睫状突下(垂直比23.7%,P = .797), 21.8%的触觉位于睫状突前角(垂直比24.9%,P = .302), 6.1%的触觉位于睫状突内(垂直比10.6%,P = 0.023)。ICL末梢触觉与水平(P = 0.009)和垂直(P = 0.049)组c -拱顶呈负相关,与外周拱顶无显著相关。结论:水平和垂直植入组在触觉分布模式上无统计学差异,而触觉位置与中央拱顶有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书