Barriers and Facilitators in Access to Care Among Adults With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries: A Qualitative Study Comparing VA and Commercial Insurance.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2026-09-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329261486136
Analay Perez, Tyler G James, Elham Mahmoudi
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators in Access to Care Among Adults With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries: A Qualitative Study Comparing VA and Commercial Insurance.","authors":"Analay Perez, Tyler G James, Elham Mahmoudi","doi":"10.1177/11786329261486136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCI) can encounter different experiences when accessing care, especially between individuals receiving care from the Veterans Affair (VA) health care insurance and commercial insurance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators in access to care among individuals with TSCI receiving care from the VA and commercial insurance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used a qualitative descriptive study and interviewed 31 participants (<i>n</i> = 13, receiving care through the VA; <i>n</i> = 18, commercially insured).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants and their caregivers participated in a semi-structured interview. To analyze the data, we used thematic text analysis to identify overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four themes: (a) challenges identifying appropriate and adequate specialized care, (b) financial assistance is limited when accessing care, (c) lack of proximity to care leads to social and contextual barriers, and (d) enhancing care through close social support systems. The first three themes were barriers to care while the latter theme was identified as a facilitator. Most participants from the VA noted challenges finding an adequate formal caregiver, whereas individuals receiving care from commercial insurance reported primarily receiving help from informal caregivers. Financial impediments were discussed between both groups, but those receiving care through commercial insurance noted the most challenges. Finally, individuals receiving care from the VA had support from the VA regarding adaptations to their home environment, whereas civilians often asked informal caregivers (e.g., family, friends, community) for help.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from this study illuminate the need for specialized care centers, caregivers, and additional supports for individuals with TSCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"19 ","pages":"11786329261486136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13554656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329261486136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCI) can encounter different experiences when accessing care, especially between individuals receiving care from the Veterans Affair (VA) health care insurance and commercial insurance.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators in access to care among individuals with TSCI receiving care from the VA and commercial insurance.

Design: We used a qualitative descriptive study and interviewed 31 participants (n = 13, receiving care through the VA; n = 18, commercially insured).

Methods: Participants and their caregivers participated in a semi-structured interview. To analyze the data, we used thematic text analysis to identify overarching themes.

Results: We identified four themes: (a) challenges identifying appropriate and adequate specialized care, (b) financial assistance is limited when accessing care, (c) lack of proximity to care leads to social and contextual barriers, and (d) enhancing care through close social support systems. The first three themes were barriers to care while the latter theme was identified as a facilitator. Most participants from the VA noted challenges finding an adequate formal caregiver, whereas individuals receiving care from commercial insurance reported primarily receiving help from informal caregivers. Financial impediments were discussed between both groups, but those receiving care through commercial insurance noted the most challenges. Finally, individuals receiving care from the VA had support from the VA regarding adaptations to their home environment, whereas civilians often asked informal caregivers (e.g., family, friends, community) for help.

Conclusions: The findings from this study illuminate the need for specialized care centers, caregivers, and additional supports for individuals with TSCI.

创伤性脊髓损伤成人获得护理的障碍和促进因素:一项比较VA和商业保险的定性研究。
背景:创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)患者在获得护理时可能会遇到不同的经历,特别是在接受退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保险和商业保险的个人之间。目的:本研究的目的是探讨在接受退伍军人管理局和商业保险护理的TSCI患者中获得护理的障碍和促进因素。设计:我们采用定性描述性研究,采访了31名参与者(n = 13,通过VA接受护理;n = 18,商业保险)。方法:参与者及其照顾者参加半结构化访谈。为了分析数据,我们使用主题文本分析来确定总体主题。结果:我们确定了四个主题:(a)确定适当和充分的专业护理的挑战,(b)在获得护理时财政援助有限,(c)缺乏接近护理导致社会和背景障碍,以及(d)通过密切的社会支持系统加强护理。前三个主题是护理的障碍,后一个主题被确定为促进因素。来自退伍军人事务部的大多数参与者都指出了找到合适的正式护理人员的挑战,而接受商业保险护理的个人则主要从非正式护理人员那里获得帮助。两组之间讨论了经济障碍,但那些通过商业保险接受护理的人指出了最大的挑战。最后,接受退伍军人事务部照顾的个人在适应家庭环境方面得到了退伍军人事务部的支持,而平民经常向非正式的照顾者(如家人、朋友、社区)寻求帮助。结论:本研究的结果阐明了TSCI患者需要专门的护理中心、护理人员和额外的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书