Jo Howe, Maura MacPhee, Hafsah Habib, Geoff Wong, Sherifat Oduola, Annabel E L Walsh, Suzanne Higgs, Katherine Allen, Alex Kenny, Justine Lovell, Amy L Ahern, Max Carlish, Rachel Upthegrove, Gurkiran Birdi, Ian D Maidment
{"title":"Healthcare professional perspectives on antipsychotic-induced weight gain: realist evaluation from the RESOLVE study.","authors":"Jo Howe, Maura MacPhee, Hafsah Habib, Geoff Wong, Sherifat Oduola, Annabel E L Walsh, Suzanne Higgs, Katherine Allen, Alex Kenny, Justine Lovell, Amy L Ahern, Max Carlish, Rachel Upthegrove, Gurkiran Birdi, Ian D Maidment","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.12097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight gain is a common, distressing side-effect of antipsychotic medication prescribed for people with severe mental illness. National guidance for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) encourages early intervention and physical health monitoring; healthcare professionals (HCPs) often struggle to implement these recommendations in routine care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore how HCPs understand and respond to AIWG for patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This realist evaluation, part of the RESOLVE project, builds on a realist synthesis. Thirty HCPs participated in realist interviews. A programme theory with nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) was generated, explaining how HCPs perceive non-pharmacological care provision for patients with AIWG. Clinical and lived experience stakeholders reviewed and refined the theory and CMOCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nine CMOCs spanned three areas: (a) systemic and professional challenges; (b) strategies to enhance individualised and meaningful support; and (c) the role and limitations of non-professional support. HCPs described how lack of training, siloed services and system-level constraints limited their ability to offer integrated care. They highlighted the importance of relational continuity, early and tailored conversations, and alignment with patients' values and motivations. Peer and family support were valued, but structural barriers undermined their consistent implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIWG was experienced as compromising professional values for HCPs working in mental health settings. Person-centred care was often undermined by fragmented systems, role ambiguity and insufficient training. These issues require investment in professional development, structural integration, and relationship-based approaches that support timely, collaborative action.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 5","pages":"e236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Weight gain is a common, distressing side-effect of antipsychotic medication prescribed for people with severe mental illness. National guidance for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) encourages early intervention and physical health monitoring; healthcare professionals (HCPs) often struggle to implement these recommendations in routine care.
Aims: To explore how HCPs understand and respond to AIWG for patients.
Method: This realist evaluation, part of the RESOLVE project, builds on a realist synthesis. Thirty HCPs participated in realist interviews. A programme theory with nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) was generated, explaining how HCPs perceive non-pharmacological care provision for patients with AIWG. Clinical and lived experience stakeholders reviewed and refined the theory and CMOCs.
Results: The nine CMOCs spanned three areas: (a) systemic and professional challenges; (b) strategies to enhance individualised and meaningful support; and (c) the role and limitations of non-professional support. HCPs described how lack of training, siloed services and system-level constraints limited their ability to offer integrated care. They highlighted the importance of relational continuity, early and tailored conversations, and alignment with patients' values and motivations. Peer and family support were valued, but structural barriers undermined their consistent implementation.
Conclusions: AIWG was experienced as compromising professional values for HCPs working in mental health settings. Person-centred care was often undermined by fragmented systems, role ambiguity and insufficient training. These issues require investment in professional development, structural integration, and relationship-based approaches that support timely, collaborative action.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.