Healthcare professional perspectives on antipsychotic-induced weight gain: realist evaluation from the RESOLVE study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jo Howe, Maura MacPhee, Hafsah Habib, Geoff Wong, Sherifat Oduola, Annabel E L Walsh, Suzanne Higgs, Katherine Allen, Alex Kenny, Justine Lovell, Amy L Ahern, Max Carlish, Rachel Upthegrove, Gurkiran Birdi, Ian D Maidment
{"title":"Healthcare professional perspectives on antipsychotic-induced weight gain: realist evaluation from the RESOLVE study.","authors":"Jo Howe, Maura MacPhee, Hafsah Habib, Geoff Wong, Sherifat Oduola, Annabel E L Walsh, Suzanne Higgs, Katherine Allen, Alex Kenny, Justine Lovell, Amy L Ahern, Max Carlish, Rachel Upthegrove, Gurkiran Birdi, Ian D Maidment","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.12097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight gain is a common, distressing side-effect of antipsychotic medication prescribed for people with severe mental illness. National guidance for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) encourages early intervention and physical health monitoring; healthcare professionals (HCPs) often struggle to implement these recommendations in routine care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore how HCPs understand and respond to AIWG for patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This realist evaluation, part of the RESOLVE project, builds on a realist synthesis. Thirty HCPs participated in realist interviews. A programme theory with nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) was generated, explaining how HCPs perceive non-pharmacological care provision for patients with AIWG. Clinical and lived experience stakeholders reviewed and refined the theory and CMOCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nine CMOCs spanned three areas: (a) systemic and professional challenges; (b) strategies to enhance individualised and meaningful support; and (c) the role and limitations of non-professional support. HCPs described how lack of training, siloed services and system-level constraints limited their ability to offer integrated care. They highlighted the importance of relational continuity, early and tailored conversations, and alignment with patients' values and motivations. Peer and family support were valued, but structural barriers undermined their consistent implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIWG was experienced as compromising professional values for HCPs working in mental health settings. Person-centred care was often undermined by fragmented systems, role ambiguity and insufficient training. These issues require investment in professional development, structural integration, and relationship-based approaches that support timely, collaborative action.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 5","pages":"e236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Weight gain is a common, distressing side-effect of antipsychotic medication prescribed for people with severe mental illness. National guidance for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) encourages early intervention and physical health monitoring; healthcare professionals (HCPs) often struggle to implement these recommendations in routine care.

Aims: To explore how HCPs understand and respond to AIWG for patients.

Method: This realist evaluation, part of the RESOLVE project, builds on a realist synthesis. Thirty HCPs participated in realist interviews. A programme theory with nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) was generated, explaining how HCPs perceive non-pharmacological care provision for patients with AIWG. Clinical and lived experience stakeholders reviewed and refined the theory and CMOCs.

Results: The nine CMOCs spanned three areas: (a) systemic and professional challenges; (b) strategies to enhance individualised and meaningful support; and (c) the role and limitations of non-professional support. HCPs described how lack of training, siloed services and system-level constraints limited their ability to offer integrated care. They highlighted the importance of relational continuity, early and tailored conversations, and alignment with patients' values and motivations. Peer and family support were valued, but structural barriers undermined their consistent implementation.

Conclusions: AIWG was experienced as compromising professional values for HCPs working in mental health settings. Person-centred care was often undermined by fragmented systems, role ambiguity and insufficient training. These issues require investment in professional development, structural integration, and relationship-based approaches that support timely, collaborative action.

医疗专业人员对抗精神病药物引起的体重增加的看法:来自RESOLVE研究的现实评价
背景:体重增加是严重精神疾病患者服用抗精神病药物时常见的令人痛苦的副作用。抗精神病药物引起的体重增加国家指南(AIWG)鼓励早期干预和身体健康监测;医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)往往难以在日常护理中实施这些建议。目的:探讨HCPs如何理解和应对患者的AIWG。方法:这个现实主义评估是RESOLVE项目的一部分,建立在现实主义综合的基础上。30名医护人员参加了现实主义访谈。一个包含9种情境-机制-结果配置(cmoc)的程序理论被生成,解释了HCPs如何看待为AIWG患者提供的非药物护理。临床和生活经验的利益相关者审查和完善了理论和cmoc。结果:9个CMOCs跨越了三个领域:(a)系统和专业挑战;(b)加强个别和有意义的支援的策略;(c)非专业支助的作用和局限性。医护人员描述了缺乏培训、孤立的服务和系统层面的限制如何限制了他们提供综合护理的能力。他们强调了关系连续性、早期和量身定制的对话以及与患者价值观和动机保持一致的重要性。同伴和家庭支持受到重视,但结构性障碍阻碍了它们的持续实施。结论:对于在精神卫生机构工作的医务人员来说,AIWG是一种有损专业价值的行为。以人为本的护理往往受到支离破碎的系统、角色模糊和培训不足的破坏。这些问题需要在专业发展、结构整合和支持及时协作行动的基于关系的方法方面进行投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书