{"title":"Calving outcomes after ipsilateral versus contralateral supplementary embryo transfer in repeat-breeder Holstein cows.","authors":"Chihiro Kanno, Takahiro Gyoda","doi":"10.1590/1984-3143-AR2026-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supplementary embryo transfer (ET) following artificial insemination (AI) is used in repeat-breeder cows; however, this dual-embryo approach inherently increases the risk of twin outcomes. This study evaluated whether transferring an embryo to the uterine horn contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL) could be associated with different calving outcomes from ipsilateral transfer. Holstein cows (n = 187; 79 nulliparous and 108 multiparous) received ipsilateral or contralateral ET 7-8 days after AI using frozen-thawed, in vitro-produced embryos. Repeat-breeder cows were clinically defined as cows failing to conceive after ≥3 artificial inseminations without evident reproductive abnormalities on routine examination. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model accounting for parity and technician. The calving rate was 34.8% (32/92) in the contralateral group and 46.3% (44/95) in the ipsilateral group, with no significant difference between groups (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.33-1.15; P = 0.137). Twin calving incidence was numerically lower after contralateral ET (4.8%, 1/21) compared with ipsilateral ET (21.2%, 7/33; P = 0.131). Because this study was based on calving records and involved a limited number of animals, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Contralateral supplementary ET may represent a practical option for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7889,"journal":{"name":"Animal Reproduction","volume":"23 3","pages":"e20260007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2026-0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Supplementary embryo transfer (ET) following artificial insemination (AI) is used in repeat-breeder cows; however, this dual-embryo approach inherently increases the risk of twin outcomes. This study evaluated whether transferring an embryo to the uterine horn contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL) could be associated with different calving outcomes from ipsilateral transfer. Holstein cows (n = 187; 79 nulliparous and 108 multiparous) received ipsilateral or contralateral ET 7-8 days after AI using frozen-thawed, in vitro-produced embryos. Repeat-breeder cows were clinically defined as cows failing to conceive after ≥3 artificial inseminations without evident reproductive abnormalities on routine examination. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model accounting for parity and technician. The calving rate was 34.8% (32/92) in the contralateral group and 46.3% (44/95) in the ipsilateral group, with no significant difference between groups (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.33-1.15; P = 0.137). Twin calving incidence was numerically lower after contralateral ET (4.8%, 1/21) compared with ipsilateral ET (21.2%, 7/33; P = 0.131). Because this study was based on calving records and involved a limited number of animals, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Contralateral supplementary ET may represent a practical option for further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Animal Reproduction (AR) publishes original scientific papers and invited literature reviews, in the form of Basic Research, Biotechnology, Applied Research and Review Articles, with the goal of contributing to a better understanding of phenomena related to animal reproduction.
The scope of the journal applies to students, researchers and practitioners in the fields of veterinary, biology and animal science, also being of interest to practitioners of human medicine. Animal Reproduction Journal is the official organ of the Brazilian College of Animal Reproduction in Brazil.