Predation impacts of free-roaming animals on terrestrial wildlife species.

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Xianzhe Wang, Zikun Gao, Cheng Zong, Kun Shi, Qiaoqi Sun
{"title":"Predation impacts of free-roaming animals on terrestrial wildlife species.","authors":"Xianzhe Wang, Zikun Gao, Cheng Zong, Kun Shi, Qiaoqi Sun","doi":"10.1111/cobi.70384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Escalating populations of free-roaming dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus), driven primarily by owner abandonment and unrestricted activity, exert pervasive predatory pressures on wildlife. Predation represents their most direct and destructive ecological impact, contributing significantly to global biodiversity decline. However, a comprehensive understanding of the global spatial patterns and environmental drivers of this threat is lacking, impeding the development of targeted conservation strategies. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic global assessment by analyzing 8933 documented predation events on wild mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians, compiled from 53 peer-reviewed studies employing a meta-analysis approach. Results showed pronounced geographical heterogeneity across continental, country, and ecosystem scales. Africa recorded the highest number of dog predation events (1698), whereas Europe was a hotspot for cat predation (2900). Populations of critically endangered (CR) species in Australia and Japan's Okinawa Islands face exceptionally high predation pressure. Dogs' predation impacts varied little across taxonomic levels. Cats, in contrast, had a taxonomically broader prey spectrum than dogs, and their impacts differed significantly among families, with Leporidae (28.49%), Procellariidae (14.79%), and Muridae (10.05%) being the most affected. Moreover, cat predation rates declined significantly with increasing human population density, longitude, and latitude and varied markedly among climate types, whereas dog predation showed no significant correlation with these environmental covariates. Collectively, our findings demonstrated a fundamental divergence in the ecological impacts, foraging behaviors, and adaptive strategies of free-roaming dogs and cats. Our study underscores the necessity for developing differentiated management strategies tailored to geographical hotspots (e.g., dog aggregation zones, islands, and regions with CR species) and to species-specific behavioral traits to mitigate predation risk and help reverse biodiversity loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e70384"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Escalating populations of free-roaming dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus), driven primarily by owner abandonment and unrestricted activity, exert pervasive predatory pressures on wildlife. Predation represents their most direct and destructive ecological impact, contributing significantly to global biodiversity decline. However, a comprehensive understanding of the global spatial patterns and environmental drivers of this threat is lacking, impeding the development of targeted conservation strategies. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic global assessment by analyzing 8933 documented predation events on wild mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians, compiled from 53 peer-reviewed studies employing a meta-analysis approach. Results showed pronounced geographical heterogeneity across continental, country, and ecosystem scales. Africa recorded the highest number of dog predation events (1698), whereas Europe was a hotspot for cat predation (2900). Populations of critically endangered (CR) species in Australia and Japan's Okinawa Islands face exceptionally high predation pressure. Dogs' predation impacts varied little across taxonomic levels. Cats, in contrast, had a taxonomically broader prey spectrum than dogs, and their impacts differed significantly among families, with Leporidae (28.49%), Procellariidae (14.79%), and Muridae (10.05%) being the most affected. Moreover, cat predation rates declined significantly with increasing human population density, longitude, and latitude and varied markedly among climate types, whereas dog predation showed no significant correlation with these environmental covariates. Collectively, our findings demonstrated a fundamental divergence in the ecological impacts, foraging behaviors, and adaptive strategies of free-roaming dogs and cats. Our study underscores the necessity for developing differentiated management strategies tailored to geographical hotspots (e.g., dog aggregation zones, islands, and regions with CR species) and to species-specific behavioral traits to mitigate predation risk and help reverse biodiversity loss.

自由漫游动物对陆生野生动物的捕食影响。
自由漫游的狗(Canis familiaris)和猫(Felis catus)的数量不断增加,主要是由于主人的遗弃和不受限制的活动,对野生动物施加了普遍的捕食压力。捕食是它们最直接和最具破坏性的生态影响,是全球生物多样性下降的重要原因。然而,缺乏对这一威胁的全球空间格局和环境驱动因素的全面了解,阻碍了有针对性的保护策略的制定。为了解决这一差距,我们采用荟萃分析方法,分析了53项同行评议的研究中8933项记录的野生哺乳动物、鸟类、爬行动物和两栖动物的捕食事件,进行了系统的全球评估。结果表明,在大陆、国家和生态系统尺度上存在明显的地理异质性。非洲记录了最多的狗捕食事件(1698),而欧洲是猫捕食的热点(2900)。澳大利亚和日本冲绳群岛的极度濒危物种种群面临着异常高的捕食压力。狗的捕食影响在不同的分类水平上变化不大。相比之下,猫在分类上比狗有更广泛的猎物谱,它们的影响在科之间存在显著差异,其中受影响最大的是狐猴科(28.49%)、绢虫科(14.79%)和蛾科(10.05%)。此外,猫的捕食率随人口密度、经纬度和气候类型的增加而显著下降,而狗的捕食率与这些环境协变量无显著相关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,自由漫游的狗和猫在生态影响、觅食行为和适应策略方面存在根本差异。我们的研究强调,有必要根据地理热点(如犬类聚集区、岛屿和有CR物种的地区)和物种特有的行为特征制定差异化的管理策略,以减轻捕食风险,帮助逆转生物多样性的丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书