Harleen Kaur, Dori W Pekmezi, Maria Pisu, Laura Q Rogers, Kelly Kenzik, Tracy E Crane, Gregory Pavela, R Drew Sayer, Holly R Wyatt, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
{"title":"Social Support and Perceived Dietary Barriers Mediate Weight Loss in the AMPLIFY Web-Based Diet Intervention.","authors":"Harleen Kaur, Dori W Pekmezi, Maria Pisu, Laura Q Rogers, Kelly Kenzik, Tracy E Crane, Gregory Pavela, R Drew Sayer, Holly R Wyatt, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2026.156875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Web-based interventions that promote healthy diet and weight loss among cancer survivors are growing, but theoretical constructs driving their success remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores whether Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) constructs (self-efficacy, social support, perceived barriers) mediate the effects of the AMPLIFY-Diet intervention on energy intake, diet quality, and body weight.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This mediation analysis used data from the AMPLIFY-Diet randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Participants/settings: </strong>Data collected from March 2020 to March 2024 at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months were analyzed from 346 overweight-or-obese cancer survivors enrolled nationwide.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Cancer survivors received a serialized, theoretically-grounded, 24-week, web-based intervention to improve diet quality and weight loss.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Energy intake and diet quality were measured using two non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls, and body weight was measured using digital scales at baseline and 6 months. SCT mediators were assessed using self-reported instruments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>Mediation analyses were conducted to estimate indirect effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3-months, the effect of the AMPLIFY-Diet intervention on weight was significantly mediated through improvements in social support from baseline (unstandardized indirect effect estimate=-0.42 (SE=0.21); 95% CI [-0.894, -0.084]); whereas, at 6-months, the effect was significantly mediated through reductions in perceived dietary barriers from baseline (unstandardized indirect effect estimate=-0.45 (SE=0.21); 95% CI [-0.928,-0.103]). Self-efficacy, social support, and perceived dietary barriers did not emerge as significant mediators for energy intake or diet quality models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that the AMPLIFY-Diet intervention achieved weight loss among cancer survivors through time-dependent mechanisms, improving social support earlier in the intervention and reducing perceived dietary barriers later on. However, these constructs did not explain changes in models for dietary intake. Future web-based dietary interventions should measure and examine additional theoretical constructs to better understand the mechanisms underlying dietary change.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"156875"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2026.156875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Web-based interventions that promote healthy diet and weight loss among cancer survivors are growing, but theoretical constructs driving their success remain unclear.
Objective: This study explores whether Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) constructs (self-efficacy, social support, perceived barriers) mediate the effects of the AMPLIFY-Diet intervention on energy intake, diet quality, and body weight.
Design: This mediation analysis used data from the AMPLIFY-Diet randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Participants/settings: Data collected from March 2020 to March 2024 at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months were analyzed from 346 overweight-or-obese cancer survivors enrolled nationwide.
Intervention: Cancer survivors received a serialized, theoretically-grounded, 24-week, web-based intervention to improve diet quality and weight loss.
Main outcome measures: Energy intake and diet quality were measured using two non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls, and body weight was measured using digital scales at baseline and 6 months. SCT mediators were assessed using self-reported instruments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Statistical analyses: Mediation analyses were conducted to estimate indirect effects.
Results: At 3-months, the effect of the AMPLIFY-Diet intervention on weight was significantly mediated through improvements in social support from baseline (unstandardized indirect effect estimate=-0.42 (SE=0.21); 95% CI [-0.894, -0.084]); whereas, at 6-months, the effect was significantly mediated through reductions in perceived dietary barriers from baseline (unstandardized indirect effect estimate=-0.45 (SE=0.21); 95% CI [-0.928,-0.103]). Self-efficacy, social support, and perceived dietary barriers did not emerge as significant mediators for energy intake or diet quality models.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that the AMPLIFY-Diet intervention achieved weight loss among cancer survivors through time-dependent mechanisms, improving social support earlier in the intervention and reducing perceived dietary barriers later on. However, these constructs did not explain changes in models for dietary intake. Future web-based dietary interventions should measure and examine additional theoretical constructs to better understand the mechanisms underlying dietary change.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.